Bahamut.Serj said:
You're the one who keeps pulling the "context of the thread" card when the thread has obviously shifted. You keep trying to justify your retardation through any means. Stating something and being called out on it and pulling out any mean you can to redeem yourself makes you look like an idiot.
Your original quote:
"If you're capping fstr, it's HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE to stack more. If you're capping atk, it's HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE to stack more.
It's situational, "str > atk" isn't total truth. I'd say it's easier to cap fstr on most stuff than it is to cap atk on it nowadays, anyway"
That implys that you think STR is easier to cap than attack. I fully agree with you. In the original context, which is what you're attempting to address because that's exactly what I addressed in the post above yours, STR was not easier to cap than attack.
So I said:
Uhh no. To cap ATk now you use food + buffs, to cap FSTR you use atma. Stacking either now is foolish and once again you're leading this down to an irrelevant debate just like tiger did because you didn't actually read anything :/
I know reverted back to the same context as you because you were out of context with my original statement.
You then said:
Exactly my *** point? Pull your head out of your ***.
Which means that you still didn't realize that there were two contexts in this debate and you assumed I was ignoring the "past" and the "present" end game.
SO I said:
So you're stating the obvious which wasn't even a point that was being debated? Thank you for giving me a firm grasp of the obvious; the sun is bright.
Which shifts us back to the "Present" end game context which was never being debated to begin with. Your statement woudl be equivalent to going into a civil war debate and saying that the North beat the South. You completely missed the point.
So you then said:
"I was reinforcing the fact that you're being a total idiot arguing against everyone about something that isn't entirely true.
Then again, you keep making a further *** out of yourself just by posting."
This implys that once again you failed to see the original context. Back before atma and level 85 cap it was not realistic to cap FSTR, and it was realistic to cap attack. This was the entire point of the STR >ATK debate. You clearly didn't read that.
So i said:
"SO you dont think STR is > attack? Even though point for point it obviously is."
You failed to see the context here was not in any situation, it was a blanket statement saying STR IS ALWAYS POINT FOR POINT BETTER THAN ATTACK. You disagreed and that confuses me because it is obviously better point for point.
So you said:
"Excluding situations that are extremely prevalent to almost any situation in game currently? Are you high?
Nice ninja edit. Why exclude atmas to any situation now? Gearing up for colibri parties at 75 isn't the cool thing to do anymore."
This shows that once again you're out of context wtih teh original debate. In answer to your question;
I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU AND NEVER ONCE SAID I DIDNT AGREE IN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT SITUATIONS WITH ATMA. HOWEVER THAT CONTEXT WAS IRRELEVANT TO THE ORIGINAL DEBATE WHICH WAS PURELY ON THE MERITS OF USING STR OVER ATTACK BEFORE ATMA.
