Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Most of this would need a full case by case analysis, but to resume. Sometimes medias source are wrong, sometimes they poorly (with or without the intent to mislead people) and sometimes they make ***up, but that one is hard to prove because they could just say their source were wrong.
Right wing medias have been riding on things like birthism, benghazi or email scandals forever which were just fake outrage in the end, I'm totally fine with investigating those things, but they have been acting about those stories the same way the left wing medias are doing with anything related to Trump.
Right wing medias have been riding on things like birthism, benghazi or email scandals forever which were just fake outrage in the end, I'm totally fine with investigating those things, but they have been acting about those stories the same way the left wing medias are doing with anything related to Trump.
Sure, people on the left going bonkers about Trump-Russia collusion without proof is practically the same thing. The only key difference is that there was evidence of wrongdoing being destroyed (remember those ~30k missing emails of Clinton's?) along with the narrative being pushed by the Obama Admin for days after the attack that this was a spontaneous incident over a YT video (or did you forget that too?).
At least with the Trump accusation that Obama wiretapped his office, there's evidence that signify that it could have happened. NYTs even reported such cases, and Flynn is a perfect example of a Trump official being wiretapped for political purposes.