Bismarck.Stephenjd said:
»People in here are crying about a fictional 15 year old having their cleavage covered up, I shudder to think what deep dark parts of the internet they go to if they care that much about a fictional 15 year old getting covered up slightly.
Bismarck.Stephenjd said:
»Does that mean you want the "eastern values" thing like the fact that the age of consent was 13 in Japan up until recently?
Thorny and Eiryl talking about wanting to *** teenagers.
Whole lot of anger here for stating that females are objectively attractive as teenagers. I'm in a almost decade long committed relationship with someone in her late 20s. I don't want to have sex with children or teenagers or even women in their early 20s, because I am not able to form an emotional bond with someone of that maturity. I do not want the age of consent reduced, and I'd actually be totally ok with laws prohibiting sex before marriage(though they'd be unenforcable).
I, and most men throughout history, consider the body type of a developed teenager to be physically attractive. That doesn't mean every teenager, people mature at different rates. I'm not going to feel ashamed of that, because it's a perfectly normal expression of human evolution. I doubt I'm the only one either. Pull up a video of Brittany Spears at 17 and tell me that she's completely unattractive because of an arbitrary line in the sand that many people have drawn at 18.