Quote:
Are you auditioning for Reality Denier #4 or something?
I didn't know denying reality had anything to do with understanding how certain statements function in the English language.
Random Politics & Religion #24 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #24
Offline
Posts: 2442
Quote: Are you auditioning for Reality Denier #4 or something? I didn't know denying reality had anything to do with understanding how certain statements function in the English language. Offline
Posts: 2442
fonewear said: » eliroo said: » eslim said: » also, the future wont be able to live off of the oil we left for them- i think the government should make a some more wars so oil can happen in a couple years for the future. What if the government... invested in... renewable energy. I heard that ***never runs out. What if I told you we can't power the grid with solar panels and wind power ! What if we made it twice as renewable? Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » He just stated that Christians shouldn't hold office. You can pick whichever one you want But knowing you, you will just ignore them all and deny reality eliroo said: » Quote: Are you auditioning for Reality Denier #4 or something? I didn't know denying reality had anything to do with understanding how certain statements function in the English language. That you don't understand English? Yeah, congratulations, you are now Reality Denier #4. Now go sit in the corner with the other 3. Here's your crayons, go to town with them! Offline
Posts: 2442
And this is how KN loses every argument. If you are wrong why not just admit it instead of labeling those who beat you as "reality deniers".
You clearly don't know the difference between "No" and "Not that I'm aware of". Offline
Posts: 35422
I'm convinced some of you guys are the product of a public school system that is more baby sitting than educating.
Offline
Posts: 2442
Today on the conservative agenda:
"What do we label those who don't agree with us?" He said nothing about Christians not being allowed to hold office. He questioned the published statement about Muslims and how this could affect policies of the appointee. "Religious test" is so hilariously hyperbolic that it's parody.
Offline
Posts: 2442
Asura.Kingnobody said: » I'll give you 3 sources You can pick whichever one you want But knowing you, you will just ignore them all and deny reality When did he not vote for him because the guy was christian? Looks like he didn't vote for him because he clearly stated that Muslims should be condemned? Talk about denying reality there. Offline
Posts: 35422
Religious test I don't know if you people could pass a drug test !
eliroo said: » And this is how KN loses every argument. If you are wrong why not just admit it instead of labeling those who beat you as "reality deniers". You clearly don't know the difference between "No" and "Not that I'm aware of". I do find it interesting that with Trump committing obstruction of justice you stretch heavily to make the "hope" claim fit the crime, and with Comey you stretch heavily to make his statement not fit the crime. Offline
Posts: 35422
When hope raises to the level of obstruction of justice all laws have failed. And we are entering chaos.
Offline
Posts: 35422
Unlike FFXIAH laws have logic and reason !
fonewear said: » I'm convinced some of you guys are the product of a public school system that is more baby sitting than educating. Not true in my case. They took away our blankies and nap time when I hit my senior year of high school. Offline
Posts: 35422
Put it this way Trump would resign long before he would be impeached. So I don't know what the big fuss is about.
Offline
Posts: 2442
Bahamut.Ravael said: » eliroo said: » And this is how KN loses every argument. If you are wrong why not just admit it instead of labeling those who beat you as "reality deniers". You clearly don't know the difference between "No" and "Not that I'm aware of". I do find it interesting that with Trump committing obstruction of justice you stretch heavily to make the "hope" claim fit the crime, and with Comey you stretch heavily to make his statement not fit the crime. Wrong. With Trump it isn't about the word "Hope". Actually if we just take Trumps statements as individual statements, I agree that he didn't commit obstruction of Justice. My argument is the intent behind those words and my basis for that argument is the situation. Obstruction of Justice is a crime of intent. I've also stated multiple times that I accept that as a possibility but not a certainity. For Comey, Perjury can be viewed a crime of Intent. Whether it is or not doesn't make a difference because his statement was way to vague to be a "smoking gun". He doesn't allude to it not happening he simply states that he, at that time, he couldn't remember. The stretch in Comey's case is actually saying that he committed Perjury because you have to infer that he was indeed aware at the time. I don't think the Trump argument is a stretch either way but a difference in viewing the situation. I, at the least, understand why you guys feel the need to protect Trump. Party above nation right? Offline
Posts: 35422
Sartre says Hell is other people. I say hell is arguing about Russia for the next four years.
/Yawn. Good morning fellow idiots, what are we trolling about today?
Offline
Posts: 2442
Well I think we should probably start viewing the Russia argument as something more than Party vs. Party. But that won't happen. As long as the liberals want to pin the Russian narrative on the conservatives and vice-versa (To a lesser extent). No one will agree. We would rather point fingers than find a solution.
We know they are messing with our politics, yet we are doing nothing about it because we have decided that our party loyalties are greater than the health of our nation hence the 2016 Election. Offline
Posts: 35422
You guys don't know anything. If you know something you wouldn't be wasting your time on FFXIAH.
Offline
Posts: 2442
I mean, you aren't wrong. (Fone)
eliroo said: » The stretch in Comey's case is actually saying that he committed Perjury because you have to infer that he was indeed aware at the time. I don't think the Trump argument is a stretch either way but a difference in viewing the situation. I, at the least, understand why you guys feel the need to protect Trump. Party above nation right? Accusing us of bias when you can't see that you're doing the exact same thing with these two cases as proof? I can't argue with someone who appears to have no self-awareness. Offline
Posts: 35422
eliroo said: » I mean, you aren't wrong. (Fone) I don't care if I'm right or wrong. I'm just here to watch. Offline
Posts: 35422
eslim said: » can someone explain the plot ? There is no point. That is the point ! Offline
Posts: 2442
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Accusing us of bias when you can't see that you're doing the exact same thing with these two cases as proof? I can't argue with someone who appears to have no self-awareness. And you didn't read a word I said, got it. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|