Anna Ruthven said: »
it's because they boot anyone who can't act like an adult.
+1
Random Politics & Religion #08 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #08
Asura.Kingnobody said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the Flame Core that is missing.” “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our posters.” We could all use a laugh at my expense, even me. Anna Ruthven said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » "Your viewpoints need to be re-evaluated if you cannot show evidence to support your claims. Even if you post basic ideas, if you cannot show evidence when asked, then why post it? You can do better than that." Too bad he is Canadian. Lakshmi.Flavin said: » So are you applying Nausi levels of ignore all reason and double down on stupid? If you seriously come away from all of that as newt delivering a reality check then there nothing anyone can do to help you anymore... Is that personal Anna? Offline
Posts: 4028
Anna Ruthven said: » A section ban is uncommon, a reversal of a section ban is rare. You were lucky, don't push it. As for public warnings *looks at current post* you have a point. Anna, iron my shirt, please. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » This isn't English class. Providing a link means very little in terms of the links accuracy. I could provide you a link that says the sky is green. You post links, then you post your "description" of the link, that doesn't even match the actual article. You don't read the articles, you just read the headlines on Hot Air. You do this every day, you did it yesterday. There is no defending it so stop trying. That was two days ago. It went unnoticed.
Anna Ruthven said: » Ramy isn't hard...either WHO HAVE YOU BEEN TALKING TO!? Anna Ruthven said: » Rooks told me to block him, and I "technically" did....for about 30 minutes. Anna Ruthven said: » Ignoring someone you will always clash with isn't a weakness. Oh oh oh! More +1111 I only have Lordgrim blocked. I think everyone should have him blocked. Fortunately, people don't even quote him.
Anna Ruthven said: » That was two days ago. It went unnoticed. I even brought this to Rook's attention (somewhat). Still, nothing got done. Shiva.Viciousss said: » I only have Lordgrim blocked. I think everyone should have him blocked. Fortunately, people don't even quote him. He's too long winded to quote on a regular basis. Offline
Posts: 4028
Anna Ruthven said: » Ignoring someone you will always clash with isn't a weakness. sounds pretty weak to me. Then again, I'm from an obscure school of thought that thinks you can't moderate ***if you have a dog in the fight. Anna Ruthven said: » That way, I have more ammunition when I appeal my next section ban. Which should happen in 4 days from now. Shiva.Viciousss said: » I only have Lordgrim blocked. I think everyone should have him blocked. Fortunately, people don't even quote him. It only has one report on it. Some of the reporting system is buggy atm. I dunno what Rooks has fixed but it hasn't been deployed yet. Anna Ruthven said: » Well it's totally BS that one side gets banned for saying stuff like that or threatened with topic bans for using terms like "Shillary" (which are hilarious) while the other side is coddled with compassion. I don't see you coming down on Vic because he voices his incendiary opinions. Offline
Posts: 4028
I'm anti feminist and she spends all her time deleting any post that is anti-feminist from me because all views and voices are acceptable as long as they're not anti-feminist.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Well it's totally BS that one side gets banned for saying stuff like that or threatened with topic bans for using terms like "Shillary" (which are hilarious) while the other side is coddled with compassion. I don't see you coming down on Vic because he voices his incendiary opinions. This gets better by the minute... Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I don't see you coming down on Vic because he voices his incendiary opinions. Probably because they aren't incendiary, you just don't like being called out for the things you do here everyday. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Well it's totally BS that one side gets banned for saying stuff like that or threatened with topic bans for using terms like "Shillary" (which are hilarious) while the other side is coddled with compassion. I don't see you coming down on Vic because he voices his incendiary opinions. Anna Ruthven said: » Ignoring someone you will always clash with isn't a weakness. I have no problem ignoring most of the wind bags on here, although I'd prefer to be given the pass of slinging the personal mud right back at them. Lakshmi.Flavin said: » All it shows is the inability to talk to another person. Even if that other person is a ***. Just like your opinion man :D Blazed1979 said: » I'm anti feminist and she spends all her time deleting any post that is anti-feminist from me because all views and voices are acceptable as long as they're not anti-feminist. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|