People ruined jokes yet again....
/sadpanda
Edit Paged:
Random Politics & Religion #08 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #08
People ruined jokes yet again....
/sadpanda Edit Paged: Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » He was incorrect in his interpretation of the statue (especially when compared to its uses in previous cases). The same law has previously been used to prosecute individuals who also had no "intent" to break the law. Breaking the law without intent is usually refereed to as negligence or gross negligence or even incompetence. Comey just did it because the justice system is corrupt, and the only way Hillary can get elected is if she cheats. Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It might be worth watching to see if she can talk over the Sanders camp boos.... You say "lol", but nobody finds you funny. Try posting actual content instead of hounding people. Alternatively, make us all happy and go away. You sure do get all butt hurt when I come around though geez... There is a block function you know if you really didn't want me to be around or I guess you can keep spamming that report button and complaining in an attempt to get people banned from posting :). /comfort. It'll be alright little buddy... I rarely touch the report button. The block function is looking awfully tempting, though.... Eh, you'll get banned again soon anyway. It's not like you ever learn your lesson. Its not hard to deny conspiracy theorists.
Maybe it's already time to close number 8.
Probably. It was a good run until Vic and Flavin showed up.
Grumpy for P&R Mod 2016.
Grumpy Cat said: » Grumpy for P&R Mod 2016. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It might be worth watching to see if she can talk over the Sanders camp boos.... You say "lol", but nobody finds you funny. Try posting actual content instead of hounding people. Alternatively, make us all happy and go away. You sure do get all butt hurt when I come around though geez... There is a block function you know if you really didn't want me to be around or I guess you can keep spamming that report button and complaining in an attempt to get people banned from posting :). /comfort. It'll be alright little buddy... I rarely touch the report button. The block function is looking awfully tempting, though.... Eh, you'll get banned again soon anyway. It's not like you ever learn your lesson. A lot of people in here need to be banned, people on both sides, especially the conspiracy theorists. Everytime someone posts some "Shrillary" claim that the broke the law in some way or another, or that Trump is a con, or broke the law in one way or another there's always a shitstorm to follow. I sat and argued for a *** hour to get someone to post proof behind their claim and it took someone else to come in, a non-regular P&R poster to get anything that qualified as proof. This whole thread is becoming a gigantic clusterfuck that should be abolished because there are some people on this site that aren't adult enough to handle real world politics. Grumpy Cat said: » Grumpy for P&R Mod 2016. Don't +, it's a shitty assignment. I'm still kicking myself in the *** for everytime I argued to keep P&R.
Asura.Kingnobody said: » Probably. It was a good run until Vic and Flavin showed up. That is so cute. Asura.Kingnobody said: » IF neither Clinton nor Trump gets "50% plus 1" electoral votes for this election, thank's to Johnson, then the election is decided by the House of Representatives (current House, not incoming House) Asura.Kingnobody said: » Probably. It was a good run until Vic and Flavin showed up. why are you kicking yourself.
Sewage belongs in the sewer, not everywhere else. Anna Ruthven said: » Flavin strikes me as undecided or in-between. Anna Ruthven said: » Everytime someone posts some "Shrillary" claim that the broke the law in some way or another, or that Trump is a con, or broke the law in one way or another there's always a shitstorm to follow. For example: Ramy and my discussion today about whether Comey was playing politics or not was very civil. People here can have civil conversations. It's those who come in just to start *** that needs to be handled. Anna Ruthven said: » I sat and argued for a *** hour to get someone to post proof behind their claim and it took someone else to come in, a non-regular P&R poster to get anything that qualified as proof. I thought that was apparent by now. You really shouldn't be surprised. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » why are you kicking yourself. Sewage belongs in the sewer, not everywhere else. I sometimes dream of such things. :) Phoenix.Xantavia said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » IF neither Clinton nor Trump gets "50% plus 1" electoral votes for this election, thank's to Johnson, then the election is decided by the House of Representatives (current House, not incoming House) The House has until the session is over to elect the next president (if Electoral College doesn't do it) or the VP winner will run until the Supreme Court decides. Source Quote: If no candidate receives a majority of Electoral votes, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most Electoral votes. Each state delegation has one vote. The Senate would elect the Vice President from the 2 Vice Presidential candidates with the most Electoral votes. Each Senator would cast one vote for Vice President. If the House of Representatives fails to elect a President by Inauguration Day, the Vice-President Elect serves as acting President until the deadlock is resolved in the House. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Everytime someone posts some "Shrillary" claim that the broke the law in some way or another, or that Trump is a con, or broke the law in one way or another there's always a shitstorm to follow. For example: Ramy and my discussion today about whether Comey was playing politics or not was very civil. People here can have civil conversations. It's those who come in just to start *** that needs to be handled. Anna Ruthven said: » I sat and argued for a *** hour to get someone to post proof behind their claim and it took someone else to come in, a non-regular P&R poster to get anything that qualified as proof. I thought that was apparent by now. You really shouldn't be surprised. As for proof, if you want to argue and don't want to look like a fool, you should be ready to provide proof. Anna Ruthven said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It might be worth watching to see if she can talk over the Sanders camp boos.... You say "lol", but nobody finds you funny. Try posting actual content instead of hounding people. Alternatively, make us all happy and go away. You sure do get all butt hurt when I come around though geez... There is a block function you know if you really didn't want me to be around or I guess you can keep spamming that report button and complaining in an attempt to get people banned from posting :). /comfort. It'll be alright little buddy... I rarely touch the report button. The block function is looking awfully tempting, though.... Eh, you'll get banned again soon anyway. It's not like you ever learn your lesson. A lot of people in here need to be banned, people on both sides, especially the conspiracy theorists. Everytime someone posts some "Shrillary" claim that the broke the law in some way or another, or that Trump is a con, or broke the law in one way or another there's always a shitstorm to follow. I sat and argued for a *** hour to get someone to post proof behind their claim and it took someone else to come in, a non-regular P&R poster to get anything that qualified as proof. This whole thread is becoming a gigantic clusterfuck that should be abolished because there are some people on this site that aren't adult enough to handle real world politics. Refusing to acknowledge the sky is blue unless someone links a news article that says the sky is blue or a video of a blue sky is asinine. The public record is the public record. Do I need to "prove" slavery was abolished next time I bring it up too? Anna Ruthven said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Probably. It was a good run until Vic and Flavin showed up. At the very least, I would get a public warning specifically calling me out (usually by you). Generally speaking, I would have already been topic banned with a section ban to follow (at least, that's what happened the last 6 times. Ask Rooks, I'm 6/6 on appeals). Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It might be worth watching to see if she can talk over the Sanders camp boos.... You say "lol", but nobody finds you funny. Try posting actual content instead of hounding people. Alternatively, make us all happy and go away. You sure do get all butt hurt when I come around though geez... There is a block function you know if you really didn't want me to be around or I guess you can keep spamming that report button and complaining in an attempt to get people banned from posting :). /comfort. It'll be alright little buddy... I rarely touch the report button. The block function is looking awfully tempting, though.... Eh, you'll get banned again soon anyway. It's not like you ever learn your lesson. A lot of people in here need to be banned, people on both sides, especially the conspiracy theorists. Everytime someone posts some "Shrillary" claim that the broke the law in some way or another, or that Trump is a con, or broke the law in one way or another there's always a shitstorm to follow. I sat and argued for a *** hour to get someone to post proof behind their claim and it took someone else to come in, a non-regular P&R poster to get anything that qualified as proof. This whole thread is becoming a gigantic clusterfuck that should be abolished because there are some people on this site that aren't adult enough to handle real world politics. Refusing to acknowledge the sky is blue unless someone links a news article that says the sky is blue or a video of a blue sky is asinine. The public record is the public record. Do I need to "prove" slavery was abolished next time I bring it up too? Anna Ruthven said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: ยป why are you kicking yourself. Sewage belongs in the sewer, not everywhere else. That was my argument, the Flame Core was removed for the same reasons. P&R is approaching Flame Core level sewage. Every now and then we all eat something that disagrees with us and we end up flushing some pretty nasty ***down the crapper. Election season is an appropriate parallel in P&R. Nah, she's fine as she is.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It might be worth watching to see if she can talk over the Sanders camp boos.... You say "lol", but nobody finds you funny. Try posting actual content instead of hounding people. Alternatively, make us all happy and go away. You sure do get all butt hurt when I come around though geez... There is a block function you know if you really didn't want me to be around or I guess you can keep spamming that report button and complaining in an attempt to get people banned from posting :). /comfort. It'll be alright little buddy... I rarely touch the report button. The block function is looking awfully tempting, though.... Eh, you'll get banned again soon anyway. It's not like you ever learn your lesson. A lot of people in here need to be banned, people on both sides, especially the conspiracy theorists. Everytime someone posts some "Shrillary" claim that the broke the law in some way or another, or that Trump is a con, or broke the law in one way or another there's always a shitstorm to follow. I sat and argued for a *** hour to get someone to post proof behind their claim and it took someone else to come in, a non-regular P&R poster to get anything that qualified as proof. This whole thread is becoming a gigantic clusterfuck that should be abolished because there are some people on this site that aren't adult enough to handle real world politics. Refusing to acknowledge the sky is blue unless someone links a news article that says the sky is blue or a video of a blue sky is asinine. The public record is the public record. Do I need to "prove" slavery was abolished next time I bring it up too? Dude the sky isn't blue the color one see's is a prism refraction of light. Hence beautiful purple and pink sunsets and clear black nights. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|