Treason And Congress Letter To Iran - No One Undermines The US Like The Republicans

naive much?

naive much?

I think the general rule is anyone outside north america thinks he's (Obama) unpopular because he is black and everyone inside the US just doesn't see it.

Well, congress isn't one person. I'm sure at least a few congressmen are secretly racist.

And I'm sure him being black has something to do with something. Republicans pretty much hated Clinton, but the level of disrespect they showed Clinton vs Obama is pretty huge.

Of course, there may be some instances where it may not be the congressmen themselves, rather, they just need to appear racist in order to appease their constituents.

Just going on what I watch on the news


Oh wait, before you say "that's a dem president" how about a Republican talking about the racism in his party? (Neo-Con at that as well)

Well, congress isn't one person. I'm sure at least a few congressmen are secretly racist.

And I'm sure him being black has something to do with something. Republicans pretty much hated Clinton, but the level of disrespect they showed Clinton vs Obama is pretty huge.

Of course, there may be some instances where it may not be the congressmen themselves, rather, they just need to appear racist in order to appease their constituents.

Secretly? There's plenty that are openly racist, lol.

Secretly? There's plenty that are openly racist, lol.

What disrespect has Obama shown congress that would incite openly racist remarks, when you seem to believe, and advocate that there is no racism going on between the party lines?

Sorry I suck at quoting people lol.

Take away the response from Jassik and focus on the second paragraph of Ihina and my reply makes more sense lol.

And I am not saying there is no racism happening. I am saying it is not nearly as Mainstream as people make it seem.

And one EASY example of his disrepect is the Immigration Executive order, there are plenty more.

No, it still doesn't make any sense at all.

You go from "There's no racism in politics" to "it's Obama's fault those individuals DISLIKE HIM BECAUSE OF HIS POLICIES AND because he DISRESPECTS congress"

There fixed your response to reflect what i am actually saying.

No, it's not what you said. And nothing needed to be fixed in my post, since it should have been fixed in *YOUR* post.

None of his policies or disrespect of Congress (btw, the Republican controlled Congress started this whole mess with disrespect) actually has any bearing on the racist remarks received for his policies. So again, tell us how you go from "there's not racism" to "it's because of his disrespect" that he's received racist remarks if there is none happening?

Most of today's house republicans were elected under the promise of sabotaging Obama (scary black President) on every turn, so it's no surprise. The people who voted them in are the lowest form of human life and their voices are being heard. Yay Democracy.

I never said RACISM was a result of his disrepect.

I said congress disrepecting obama is a result of obama disrepecting congress AS A PRESIDENT, do not twist my words and make it sound like i am saying they disrepect him as a black person, that is not what i am saying

You want to twist someone else's words, they'll get twisted right back - remember that.

Congress went batshit crazy on even the most reasonable of requests to Congress, and Executive Orders are a last ditch effort to get ***moving. Congress was tasked with creating an Immigration reform bill, and sat on their *** doing ***all. So an Executive Order was made to deal with it - tell me again how that is disrespecting Congress?

You ever hear of "political gridlock"? Yeah, Executive Orders were designed and implemented as a means to bypass that gridlock in order to get ***moving.

Obama still sucks as a president. Nothing the Republicans do changes that.

So... you've got nothing.

Using a final measure within the Presidential Powers as outlined by the United States Constitution, is somehow disrespectful to Congress, which refused to budge, negotiate, compromise, or create a bill with which they are tasked, and thus responsible for doing (or not doing, in this case) which is disrespectful to their electorate, and the citizens at large, is somehow a greater affront to Congress, because they refused to do anything.

So that's where the animosity is coming from.

Gotcha.

There is that, but keep in mind that if Obama sucks as a president, were the Republican nominees going to be any better, given the situation left behind by the Bush Administration?

Arguably doubtful.

Again, I still assert that had Romney campaigned on his successes as Governor, he would have won, and the same ***would have happened.

There is that, but keep in mind that if Obama sucks as a president, were the Republican nominees going to be any better, given the situation left behind by the Bush Administration?

Arguably doubtful.

Again, I still assert that had Romney campaigned on his successes as Governor, he would have won, and the same ***would have happened.

All Obama has done is do what Republicans blame him of doing, Acting like a King. If things are not going his way, he does the research and if he can act independently he does it. While loopholes and technical wording may allow this to happen, it does not make it right. As I said before, I like political gridlock, it allows for MORE debate and MORE refinement.

The reason amnesty hasn't been dealt with up to this point is because the ROOT of the problem has yet to be dealt with.

Why mop up the puddle if the hose is still running?

We need to address the issue of BORDER CONTROL not AMNESTY.

Perhaps, but I tire of giving politicians a pass simply because there's a chance the other guy might have been worse. It's like we don't even care to hold our own people to a high standard. We're just happy to be able to make the case that we have the slightly more polished turd.

Besides, who is actually willing to bring treason charges against a sitting congressman? It would be career suicide.

Historical Outline

1st: 　 Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today.　 This martial law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America.　 This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress.　 Today these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

2nd: 　 The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law.　 This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.

3rd: 　 In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution’s 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. 　 At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913.

4th: 　 Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay.　 Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S’. assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

5th: 　 As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money.　 The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full).　 The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”.　 Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money.　 Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system—again it has no government relation at all.　 The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

6th: 　 Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment.　 Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it; there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the nature of corporate enactments.　 You must also note that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment.　 The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations.　 We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

7th: 　 Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment.　 This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation’s Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected, which is the subject matter of this amendment.　 According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.

8th: 　 Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained vacant because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution for placement of a national Senator.

9th: 　 In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W.I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.

10th: 　 In 1918, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only.　 Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity.　 Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original jurisdiction government officers. 　 It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in preparation for an impending war with France.　 During this period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the nation.　 Mr. Adams averted the war through diplomacy and the title of Commander in Chief was returned to him.　
(See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well.　 Mr. Adams was a fascinating man.)

11th: 　 In 1933, the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th: 　 In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.

13th: 　 Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program.　 With the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security number).　 They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to sign it (as the fiduciary) and keep it.　 You are also to note that though the card identifies its agency and you as the single person with authority to control the entity they created, you are not to use it as identification.　 On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, they set you to serve in its Trustee capacity, they gave you something (the card) to hold that does not belong and they made the GTF the beneficiary of the entity—by definition, this can only be described as a Trust.　 More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your number and your serving in this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way—what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you.

14th: 　 In 1968, at the National Governor’s Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely to kill them all and start over.　 They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do.　 Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law.　 The people govern themselves.　 Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.

15th: 　 By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.