Bf Stabbed For Eating Thanksgiving Meal To Early

Feminism is so strong it has seeped into country music videos.

I guess that guy shouldn't have been such a...


...turkey.

See if you are a woman keying a car setting an apartment on fire is perfectly acceptable but if a man does it is a felony.

Hey, man! Hey! Go easy on Carrie Underwood.

That's some primo, car-windows-rolled-up, scream-singing. Almost as good as exaggerated, Reba-Divaing, arm-flailing with one hand on the steering wheel to this...

Thanks for posting the Good Morning America interview with the CEO of Facebook. Very good interview.

Saw this on Yahoo, thought it was relevant.

Originally posted by MacLean's, which I don't have an online subscription to:

Female Teachers: The Sex Offenders no one suspects




This is probably the most sickening part - apparently female teachers can't be "predators", despite intentionally preying on young males.

interesting timing...

after reading bloodrose's post; i just saw a commercial talking about how women are victims of domestic violence. And how there organization is set up to help WOMEN. And the usually 'please help the women' rhetoric...

And while im all for stopping domestic violence, i couldn't help but notice that they are set up, targeting, and only helping women. Any man that's a victim can go f*** themselves'

I like Reba, but I can't watch her sing, too much mouth-twisting.

And it's possible for a devote christian to believe in a graceful and kind deity that routinely throws disbelievers into hell and tortures them throughout eternity. Cognitive dissonance has ever been a feature amongst humankind.

Feminism is a gynocentric philosophy that places the needs of women above everything else, including the needs of men. Because of this it can never be about equality, it can only be about the furthering of a pro-female agenda, often at the expense of men. This was accepted because for a long time the idea of women being "oppressed" was accepted as fact, when it reality it was far more complicated. Both men and women had different sets of privileges and obligations. Female obligation and male privilege are bundled together and coined "Patriarchy" and sold as this bogeyman in the shadows. The opposite, male obligation and female privilege, is venomously denied to exist while being blatantly obvious to even the most cursory of examinations.

What we are discussing here is female privilege, one of which is the fact that humans will immediately excuse responsibility for a females actions. She can do horrendous things and we would look for a reason to dismiss her actions as not her responsibility. Men on the other hand are held strictly accountable for their actions and the consequences thereof. Another female privilege is they are immediately believed to be better at raising children regardless of past demonstrated behaviors. A women has to practically be a drug addicted multiple-convicted felon before the courts will give the father full custody. But the biggest female privilege of all is the immediate assumption that men should be burdened with taking care of them. Practically every welfare system, when broken down into who's paying and who's receiving, is a wealth transfer system to take wealth and resources from men and provide them to women via the states monopoly on violence. This bleeds over into our family court system where it's possible to award the mother over 100% of the males earnings, and then put the male in jail until he can pay it. I say "male" because the man doesn't even need to be the biological father, the mother merely needs to make a strong passionate case that he was "supporting" her and the child previously.

It gets way deeper but our entire social system is horribly broken towards men. It ignores mens need for support and ridicules the very notion of a mens support group. Just witness the reaction of the local "feminists" to the concept of men getting together, venting their feelings, and providing needed emotional support to each other. What kind of mentally f*cked up person would believe that it's "ok" for women to get together and collectively bash men as a form of emotional release but think it's reprehensible for men to do the same? That's some pretty hardcore misandry right there. And that is the biggest issue of them all. The blatant acceptance and encouragement of misandry by society, valiantly lead by the feminism elite.

It gets pretty deep into human nature / instinct and how it helped shape our past social structures. The short version is that men are expected to demonstrate / earn social value by action while women are assumed to have innate social value by virtue of their gender. A man who is incapable of helping himself is of little value to the tribe / society and is thus ignored while a women always has value is protected and supported. Girls writes what has a very good video post describing this effect known as male disposability. It's instinctual and most won't even know it's presence until it's pointed out.

Easy test with a thought experiment. Imagine a male character getting brutally murdered, lots of gore and just very unpleasant. Now imagine a female character getting the exact same. It has been demonstrated to be two very distinct emotional reactions. People feel bad for the male and want to avoid hid fate, people feel outraged and horrified at the female and want to avenge her.

What kind of mentally f*cked up person thinks that women's groups are there for the purpose of getting together and collectively bashing men as a form of emotional release?

For example?
***.
***.
Then you should be able to provide statistics of total court cases for custody, then subdivide them into cases where custody is contested, then show the number of cases where bias is demonstrated.
The concept of a men's support group isn't necessarily a bad one, working towards providing actual social support for men in domestic abuse/violence cases, working for parental (and paternal) leave.

But it's beyond stupid to think that it should be socially acceptable to attempt to form a group that rips into a minority which has historically been absolutely shat upon by everyone possible, for whatever "privileges" you believe they have.

I'm still waiting for a rational feminist...

Guys, I find out how Saev makes his living.

At least women haven't started asking for reparations yet

I'm still waiting for a rational people to enter the thread, esp men. So far there's maybe 3 people total? Not impressive. Esp the blinded conspiracy theories, but humanity is prone to those i guess.

p.s. my ex husband and I split care of our kids. We each have joint custody of the kids, one lives with him, one lives with me, neither of us pay child support... So maybe your examples should evaluate their lives and see if they "done *** up".

Most* judges will not put the kids in a home that is unstable, mentally or physically harmful, or in a home with a jobless/homeless parent when the other parent has a job/home, the courts look out for the kids first, not the desires of the parents, be they male or female.

**I say most because, well, in every group, there will always be bad or stupid eggs, judges can be biased, either by age, or social conditioning. Esp older judges.

Still waiting...

Better get comfy as I know of only one rational feminist and I won't be bringing my wife in to this lol

This little graphic explains all you need to know:

I hate giving these guys any fuel for their already-burning fire of raging testosterone and cherry-picked talking points, but this isn't quite correct.

Parently rights are an absolute *** to get terminated, especially when it comes to mothers. I've seen and heard of kids in really, really bad situations with foster families who are ready, willing, and able to take the children into a loving home, but they can't because parental rights trump the child's, apparently. They're entitled to at least partial custody unless they're really, really bad.

And even if they do manage to get the kids out of those homes, as soon as the parents "clean up their act" there's a chance of getting partial-to-full custody returned.

Ditto.
But hey, we can't always get what we want.

And at least i know who the irrational ones are^^ So I get some amusement while I wait.

Well.... amusement mixed with facepalming disgust, tho like I said, can't always get what we want.

But since nothing really happens here, i've more interesting things to do. Maybe I'll check back later^^

I'm glad I will never deal with any of this ***firsthand lol

Closest I've ever been was discussing abortion while being the only male in the classroom...yea my opinion wasn't heard.

Yes everyone who doesn't agree with you is irrational...

Should be legal to abort people after they are born

That is the foundation of feminism. If you don't agree you are wrong. They don't want to hear dissenting opinions.

+∞