Bahamut.Ravael said: »
/slap
U.S. Poll:Obama Worst President In Modern Times
U.S. poll:Obama worst president in modern times
/slap
Jetackuu said: »
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Personally, I would Damn every HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE *** who thinks the Amendments in the Constitution are God Given, considering how many times it had to be amended from the original Bill of Rights. And the fact that every other country with a constitution has a differing number of rights - supposedly God Given.
Now the rest of the constitution: yeah it's been amended, and could use a few more.
The Second Amendment - Right to bear arms, was an amendment made to the original English common law, and originally codified in the English Bill of Rights, originally restricted to a public allowance under due restrictions, and the use of Well Organized Militias for the natural right of self-preservation and resistance, when the sanctions of society and law are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression. (This is the original English Common Law version)
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Personally, I would Damn every HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE *** who thinks the Amendments in the Constitution are God Given, considering how many times it had to be amended from the original Bill of Rights. And the fact that every other country with a constitution has a differing number of rights - supposedly God Given.
Now the rest of the constitution: yeah it's been amended, and could use a few more.
The Second Amendment - Right to bear arms, was an amendment made to the original English common law, and originally codified in the English Bill of Rights, originally restricted to a public allowance under due restrictions, and the use of Well Organized Militias for the natural right of self-preservation and resistance, when the sanctions of society and law are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression. (This is the original English Common Law version)
But that is not true with the American Bill of Rights. Which is what we are talking about...
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Personally, I would Damn every HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE *** who thinks the Amendments in the Constitution are God Given, considering how many times it had to be amended from the original Bill of Rights. And the fact that every other country with a constitution has a differing number of rights - supposedly God Given.
Now the rest of the constitution: yeah it's been amended, and could use a few more.
The Second Amendment - Right to bear arms, was an amendment made to the original English common law, and originally codified in the English Bill of Rights, originally restricted to a public allowance under due restrictions, and the use of Well Organized Militias for the natural right of self-preservation and resistance, when the sanctions of society and law are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression. (This is the original English Common Law version)
I don't give a rats *** about English common law.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
The problem with that is, it is open for interpretation.
But that is not true with the American Bill of Rights. Which is what we are talking about...
But that is not true with the American Bill of Rights. Which is what we are talking about...
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Personally, I would Damn every HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE *** who thinks the Amendments in the Constitution are God Given, considering how many times it had to be amended from the original Bill of Rights. And the fact that every other country with a constitution has a differing number of rights - supposedly God Given.
Now the rest of the constitution: yeah it's been amended, and could use a few more.
The Second Amendment - Right to bear arms, was an amendment made to the original English common law, and originally codified in the English Bill of Rights, originally restricted to a public allowance under due restrictions, and the use of Well Organized Militias for the natural right of self-preservation and resistance, when the sanctions of society and law are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression. (This is the original English Common Law version)
But that is not true with the American Bill of Rights. Which is what we are talking about...
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Actually, we were talking about whether it has gone through any amendments since it's inception - which it was codified from the original English Bill of Rights, and considered to be the interpretation of a "pre-existing right", dating to the 1689 English Bill of Rights, in 2008.
Jetackuu said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
The problem with that is, it is open for interpretation.
But that is not true with the American Bill of Rights. Which is what we are talking about...
But that is not true with the American Bill of Rights. Which is what we are talking about...
Problem is, her version of the 2nd Amendment only had the first half of it.
Jetackuu said: »
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
Personally, I would Damn every HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE *** who thinks the Amendments in the Constitution are God Given, considering how many times it had to be amended from the original Bill of Rights. And the fact that every other country with a constitution has a differing number of rights - supposedly God Given.
Now the rest of the constitution: yeah it's been amended, and could use a few more.
The Second Amendment - Right to bear arms, was an amendment made to the original English common law, and originally codified in the English Bill of Rights, originally restricted to a public allowance under due restrictions, and the use of Well Organized Militias for the natural right of self-preservation and resistance, when the sanctions of society and law are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression. (This is the original English Common Law version)
I don't give a rats *** about English common law.
Also, since the Second Amendment was based partially from the English Bill of Rights, it can back up the "pre-existing right" argument.
How can that be so? Fathers send their wives and children thousands of miles across the world in hopes for my signature of acceptence to my home.
The Iraq war, people who hated Bush, the country is begging me to give order to come back with guns.
Wall street dow jones was not even 9000 during the great recession, yet clised over 17000. So the money mongers love me.
The poor love me, I given them free phones. Oh and many have the right to attend our universities or open businesses here. So they love me.
The sick and poor I gave obama care, so they bow gracefully to me.
I pay the army even when goverment shutdowns, oh and gave 52 week unemployment ftom 18 weeks. So the jobless love me.
I done all of these plus much more. More than any one person or group could do. No please praise me, as I am confident I have done something to help improve your lufe.
The Iraq war, people who hated Bush, the country is begging me to give order to come back with guns.
Wall street dow jones was not even 9000 during the great recession, yet clised over 17000. So the money mongers love me.
The poor love me, I given them free phones. Oh and many have the right to attend our universities or open businesses here. So they love me.
The sick and poor I gave obama care, so they bow gracefully to me.
I pay the army even when goverment shutdowns, oh and gave 52 week unemployment ftom 18 weeks. So the jobless love me.
I done all of these plus much more. More than any one person or group could do. No please praise me, as I am confident I have done something to help improve your lufe.
[+]
That in no way changed the bill of rights, but I guess your definition of what that means is different, so I'll drop it.
On another note: stop bringing up English common law, nobody cares.
On another note: stop bringing up English common law, nobody cares.
[+]
Ragnarok.Presidentobama said: »
How can that be so? Fathers send their wives and children thousands of miles across the world in hopes for my signature of acceptence to my home.
The Iraq war, people who hated Bush, the country is begging me to give order to come back with guns.
Wall street dow jones was not even 9000 during the great recession, yet clised over 17000. So the money mongers love me.
The poor love me, I given them free phones. Oh and many have the right to attend our universities or open businesses here. So they love me.
The sick and poor I gave obama care, so they bow gracefully to me.
I pay the army even when goverment shutdowns, oh and gave 52 week unemployment ftom 18 weeks. So the jobless love me.
I done all of these plus much more. More than any one person or group could do. No please praise me, as I am confident I have done something to help improve your lufe.
The Iraq war, people who hated Bush, the country is begging me to give order to come back with guns.
Wall street dow jones was not even 9000 during the great recession, yet clised over 17000. So the money mongers love me.
The poor love me, I given them free phones. Oh and many have the right to attend our universities or open businesses here. So they love me.
The sick and poor I gave obama care, so they bow gracefully to me.
I pay the army even when goverment shutdowns, oh and gave 52 week unemployment ftom 18 weeks. So the jobless love me.
I done all of these plus much more. More than any one person or group could do. No please praise me, as I am confident I have done something to help improve your lufe.
Please say it is so.
As a general rule, it's always better to hate your leader than love them. Hitler's Approval ratings were somewhere in the 90%'s up until the Colonel Lemay's terror bombing doctrine was introduced to Europe. (And even then, I don't think it dropped too much)
Also, on the flip side of things, people are fickle. EA is consistently voted worst company in America. That Bank of America didn't even make it to semi-finals shows how stupid polls are.
Also, on the flip side of things, people are fickle. EA is consistently voted worst company in America. That Bank of America didn't even make it to semi-finals shows how stupid polls are.
Odin.Zicdeh said: »
Also, on the flip side of things, people are fickle. EA is consistently voted worst company in America. That Bank of America didn't even make it to semi-finals shows how stupid polls are.
Bank of America's customer service isn't that bad, not as bad as some credit unions and small banks here in Texas.
(Disclaimer: I deal with banks all the time).
EA works hard to earn that title.
Comcast won a recent "worst company in America" title. I still think Zynga should have been in the running.
It definitely seems like the public face is what's considered most in those sort of things. Which I guess is actually fitting in the context of the OP, since I doubt many people know just how bad the president(s) really is(are) as government has the transparency of... Actually I can't think of an analogy that exceeds the lack of transparency in the government.
Is Zynga even still relevant? I haven't heard anything from them in a while. Figure they just milk their human batteries matrix style with Farmville and its reskins.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Comcast won a recent "worst company in America" title. I still think Zynga should have been in the running.
Is Zynga even still relevant? I haven't heard anything from them in a while. Figure they just milk their human batteries matrix style with Farmville and its reskins.
Odin.Zicdeh said: »
since I doubt many people know just how bad the president(s) really is(are) as government has the transparency of...
Not even Superman can see through that ***....
[+]
Zynga is losing relevance, but it kinda set a standard of sleazy business practices in gaming. For that, it should be forever shamed. Or at least that's how I see it.
[+]
I am not even gonna front like the president is this powerful entity; how about this, all branches are performing quite pathetic in this modern era. Just my 2 cents.
However, several ppl mentioned bias polls, and since we are in the XI forums, it only seems fitting. http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/1697-What-new-Jug-Pets-would-you-like-to-see-91-99?p=213879&viewfull=1#post213879.
Moar polls please^^
However, several ppl mentioned bias polls, and since we are in the XI forums, it only seems fitting. http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/1697-What-new-Jug-Pets-would-you-like-to-see-91-99?p=213879&viewfull=1#post213879.
Moar polls please^^
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Comcast won a recent "worst company in America" title. I still think Zynga should have been in the running.
People actually call up "Zynga" for support?
Bahamut.Ravael said:
Zynga is losing relevance, but it kinda set a standard of sleazy business practic
EA? Activision? Capcom? All those shitty 90s companies that pumped out bad games that wasted kids money with licensed ***?
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said:
Zynga is losing relevance, but it kinda set a standard of sleazy business practic
EA? Activision? Capcom? All those shitty 90s companies that pumped out bad games that wasted kids money with licensed ***?
In the same place as Half-Life 3.
Jetackuu said: »
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said:
Zynga is losing relevance, but it kinda set a standard of sleazy business practic
EA? Activision? Capcom? All those shitty 90s companies that pumped out bad games that wasted kids money with licensed ***?
I'm pretty sure it was a middle finger to him for leaving.
But they didn't notice they were also giving it to all of their fans...
Shiva.Gib said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said:
Zynga is losing relevance, but it kinda set a standard of sleazy business practic
EA? Activision? Capcom? All those shitty 90s companies that pumped out bad games that wasted kids money with licensed ***?
I'm pretty sure it was a middle finger to him for leaving.
But they didn't notice they were also giving it to all of their fans...
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.