A New War You Can't Blame On Bush! Or Can You?

"We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming."


So according to this article only 32% of the papers supported the belief in global warming and the bloated 97% is really 97% of the 32%. Thanks.

And this is a perfect example of how this issue gets twisted into an illusion of debate.

Anthropogenic means primarily resulting from atmospheric pollution by humans. The 66% of papers taking no stance on the CAUSE are strictly analysis of data, 32% taking a stance of causation. Together they are 97% of scientific studies reaching the conclusion that global climate change is real and caused by humans, with 2/3 of those studies not expressing an "opinion".

Basically, 97% of studies conclude that humans are responsible for global climate change and 2/3 of those are solely analytical (that's a big deal in scientific circles because it eliminates the variable of subjectivity).

Well, no...

Of the ~4000 papers that stated any kind of position, whether an endorsement or rejection, 97% of them were in agreement about AGW. This is not a unique result, either.

Knowing what I did then? Invaded Afghanistan. You know, where OBL and AQ conspirators were said to be hiding. They took credit for the attacks and the Taliban sheltered AQ.

People rightfully criticize Bush and co. because the evidence was weak in Iraq, we were already distributing freedom in Afghanistan and we were quick to adopt the neocon ideas of regime change and attack, attack, attack coated in patriotism and god bless America.

The media on both sides lapped it up and Congress fell in line based on the intel given to them. It was a huge blunder that contributed to our fiscal situation and it could have all been avoided.

Yeah now who is flailing?

Only 32.6% of the papers endorsed global warming, and 97% of those believed the cause of global warming was man-made. 66% of the papers gave no position which means they did not support/endorse global warming. Stop trying to spin these numbers, you crushed your own argument with the article you posted.

Though I'm sure you probably believe that the 66% probably actually saw the evidence of global warming, but were paid by oil companies to say they didn't.

You're missing important key words and as usual don't understand the actual definitions of them.

Syria to Climate Change? Makes sense.

from now on i am just going to jump in AH political threads around page 5 or 6 and say BILDERBERG GROUP

hope that's cool, bros

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/08/27/20209022-military-strikes-on-syria-as-early-as-thursday-us-officials-say

Let's see what Russia and China does to us in the days after...

nothing.....

I'll bet 100 internets.

It is a sad day if they're really thinking about gearing up to go world policing again.

You have his vote!



Has anyone noticed how similar Prince Charles and GW look? NWO? Illuminati? Free Masons?

/spooky fingers

You mean born into power and confused by simple concepts?

Great! More casualties. That's just what we need. As if the images last week weren't disturbing enough. I hope Cameron has the sense to keep Britain from following us into another endless folly.

Aman has nothing but his usual Obamacare, Climate Change, RNC talking points rotation. The eagerness to change the topic to something on script every time is telling.

Syria? FEMA CAMPS
Iraq? OBAMACARE
Egypt? CLIMATE CHANGE
Israel? LIBERALS
Red Velvet Cake? COMMUNISTS

I don't remember when prescott bush was president...are you from an alternate time stream?

everything was cool until jfk decided to croak the kings and install the baath party... it's interesting if you look at jfk foreign policy how many messes we are still dealing with fifty some odd years later.
vietnam, cuba, iraq, latin america etc.

fdr is only to blame for messing up the us lol

Prescott Bush was never president, he was arguably more influential than most presidents, though. He's an interesting figure to read about, but he definitely had his role in the ***-storm the middle east has become.

I'm interested in his connection to syria and can find no mention...

linky por favor?

I don't see any kind of link directly to syria from a few quick searches, but I don't think that's what he was implying by bringing up Prescott Bush's influence on the middle east. Just that there were people stirring stuff up before JFK was.

I'd still be bitching because then we'd have higher tensions with China or at least war. I find it funny the "businessman" candidate wanted to all out go against China...where the cheapest industrial labor is..."BMINO" i guess.

Anyway,I didnt mean to say "You missed the point" i meant to say "We had intelligence something was gunna happen and we just let something happen".

Im surprised with how we arent at war with central and south america for all the naughty coups and government shifts we either directly or indirectly enacted in those countries :< I mean...Cuba hates us for a reason, Castro knows what would happen to him eventually if we had political ties.

This is the only one of your posts im going to address and it qualifies as an answer for every post hereafter in this thread: No. Go sit the *** down and read the part of the internet thats all facts and not *** propaganda inaccuracies spread to misinform and poison the voter pool.

Amandarius and his lefty enablers can derail any subject.

He trolls with bait they find irresistible.

Bait... sheer bait.

He's good at it too.

I can get off this hook any time i want thank you! *tugs at troll hook* *gives up* *goes to research information for Amandarius' next attempt at a tug*

personally, I like when he breaks character & pops out something totally spot-on, or a funny joke, I always doubletake on avi when he pulls that ***. good times.

Let's not act like any of us are above derailing.

Only when the DNC pays me, baby.

Well, we all know a house fire of a thread when we see it. Why not toast some marshmallows over the embers?

that's my favorite thing to do, honestly.

unless of course there is some actual discourse taking place, but......

I like how disagreeing with a delusional person makes you a lefty.

Actually, that makes you a righty.

Agreeing with a delusional person makes you a lefty. Ask Uncle Biden.

The hell you all goin on about now?