Leviathan.Novax said: »
I didn't play a whole lot of Black-ops due to friends boycotting it, but most of their moans came from overly large maps. Was this really an issue?
All of Black Ops maps were too small, except for like Array and Discovery.
Battlefield 3 |
||
|
Battlefield 3
Leviathan.Novax said: » I didn't play a whole lot of Black-ops due to friends boycotting it, but most of their moans came from overly large maps. Was this really an issue? All of Black Ops maps were too small, except for like Array and Discovery. Thunderz said: » There is nothing wrong with vehicles in a FPS also Battlefield is not focused on TDM its objectives (rush mode) and Ground control (Conquest) I'm just saying if I were designing an FPS I would never in a million years put vehicles in it. They're not for me. Admittedly they do have really good controls in BC2, and that's where I derived a lot of my fun - Racing an ATV around Atacama Desert or whatever - But I can't bring myself to get in a tank or helicopter with the purpose of killing other people. It's just not far to me. Fenrir.Enternius said: » Leviathan.Novax said: » Oh maybe I am, my bad. Black Ops had many problems.
Hit detection was trash. Some perk combos were overly broken. Steady Aim hip firing made any need to aim down sites completely useless...The game gimped anyone who's played a lot of FPS and was good and made your average trash player decent. Also every gun got nerfed except the AK-74u and Galil :/ hey man all am saying is that ......... and still the most bought series
Sales data from List of best-selling video games (Wikipedia) 1.Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (14.7 million) 2.Halo 3 (8.1 million) 3.Halo 2 (8 million) 4.GoldenEye 007 (8 million) 5.Half-Life 2 (6.5 million) 6.Halo: Combat Evolved (5 million) am just saying fun or go home................ Psycho Slip said: » Fenrir.Enternius said: » And again, I never once said BF3 is going to be a bad game by any means. Just not a game I'm likely to play all that much, aside from the two weeks before MW3, and more importantly Skyrim. Ramuh.Urial said: » Black Ops had many problems. Hit detection was trash. Some perk combos were overly broken. Steady Aim hip firing made any need to aim down sites completely useless...The game gimped anyone who's played a lot of FPS and was good and made your average trash player decent. Also every gun got nerfed except the AK-74u and Galil :/ Fenrir.Enternius said: » Thunderz said: » There is nothing wrong with vehicles in a FPS also Battlefield is not focused on TDM its objectives (rush mode) and Ground control (Conquest) I'm just saying if I were designing an FPS I would never in a million years put vehicles in it. They're not for me. Admittedly they do have really good controls in BC2, and that's where I derived a lot of my fun - Racing an ATV around Atacama Desert or whatever - But I can't bring myself to get in a tank or helicopter with the purpose of killing other people. It's just not far to me. Honestly vehicles or anti-vehicle support were always balanced it's just 9/10 an idiot would screw it up for your team and you'd have to take them out the old fashion way....but a good c4 kamikaze is always fun IMO. Bismarck.Lilinett said: » hey man all am saying is that ......... and still the most bought series Sales data from List of best-selling video games (Wikipedia) 1.Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (14.7 million) 2.Halo 3 (8.1 million) 3.Halo 2 (8 million) 4.GoldenEye 007 (8 million) 5.Half-Life 2 (6.5 million) 6.Halo: Combat Evolved (5 million) am just saying fun or go home................ Perhaps the first game in a decade that has a serious chance at competing with 1.6 for the king of FPS spot granted EA plays their card right.
Which is very unlikely and makes me sad. Still a day one, very excited. Vehicles demolished my interest in the Halo series.
Can't wait for Battlefield 3. It'll be the multiplayer game I'll send most of my time with. Probably ask for MW3 as a gift come Christmas since the horde mode with killstreaks sounds pretty cool.
Honestly Halo's MP didn't get stupid until they launched the 3rd. 1 and 2 were very well done to be an unrealistic shooter. Bubble shield and similar items just made it stupid.
Oh look Sales figures
>.>; doesn't mean jack to me I was just pointing out BF3 has more than just explosions. Battlefield is known for the chaos that ensues during a furious struggle, but that's not all it's known for. You have a right to your opinion, and I'm not trying to debate it.
I have a CoD that I still play occasionally, CoD is fun for awhile for me, but it wears fast and fails to hold my interest. Honestly some of the best games go overlooked because they aren't the top name titles. Medal of honor and Homefront were two of the best FPS with mechanics and gameplay yet most people didn't give it a shot. The casual gamer typically got turned of from them simply because they couldn't run in like an idiot and expect a couple kills. That's why Halo games, MW2 and Black Ops sell well. Little skill to play decently = people are interested.
Psycho Slip said: » I was just pointing out BF3 has more than just explosions. Battlefield is known for the chaos that ensues during a furious struggle, but that's not all it's known for. You have a right to your opinion, and I'm not trying to debate it. I have a CoD that I still play occasionally, CoD is fun for awhile for me, but it wears fast and fails to hold my interest. Ramuh.Urial said: » Honestly some of the best games go overlooked because they aren't the top name titles. Medal of honor and Homefront were two of the best FPS with mechanics and gameplay yet most people didn't give it a shot. The casual gamer typically got turned of from them simply because they couldn't run in like an idiot and expect a couple kills. That's why Halo games, MW2 and Black Ops sell well. Little skill to play decently = people are interested. Yes, you can get a decent score without knowing too much about the game, but there's always something you can improve on and get better at. I guess you could equate Modern Warfare games to chess in that aspect. Easy to learn, impossible to master. Fenrir.Enternius said: » Ramuh.Urial said: » Honestly some of the best games go overlooked because they aren't the top name titles. Medal of honor and Homefront were two of the best FPS with mechanics and gameplay yet most people didn't give it a shot. The casual gamer typically got turned of from them simply because they couldn't run in like an idiot and expect a couple kills. That's why Halo games, MW2 and Black Ops sell well. Little skill to play decently = people are interested. Yes, you can get a decent score without knowing too much about the game, but there's always something you can improve on and get better at. I guess you could equate Modern Warfare games to chess in that aspect. Easy to learn, impossible to master. Edit: Albeit IDK if you've actually ever played with me before I snapped at the camping etc and just started using explosives. Fenrir.Enternius said: » Psycho Slip said: » I was just pointing out BF3 has more than just explosions. Battlefield is known for the chaos that ensues during a furious struggle, but that's not all it's known for. You have a right to your opinion, and I'm not trying to debate it. I have a CoD that I still play occasionally, CoD is fun for awhile for me, but it wears fast and fails to hold my interest. you can go prone in battlefield 3 Anyways Enuff with the bickering I JUST WANT DICE TO TELL US ABOOT DEM BETA! dljadnh;oandf;ajndfkjdnafjdnasfkadnskfndkasfnasweonj; /throws table out balcony and proceeds to follow it I'd recommend CoD for any beginner FPS player.
Thunderz said: » you can go prone in battlefield 3 Ramuh.Urial said: » Ent, you and I both know though the average player in those games are rather eh though just look at the number of players who follow the CoD 5 step guide. And I wish I could still get games like that. The past 5 days, all games I joined were just me against one or two other people. I once joined a game against 4 people and they were all using tanks defending their Bomb site things. That's no fun at all. Especially with an Abrams which is practically invincible from the front. Carl Gustavs didn't even give me hitmarkers. Real pro's were doing the long range recon before people knew about it!
Ramuh.Urial said: » And you were wrong. I've been quickscoping in BC2 for a couple months now >.> Red Dot makes it too easy. wat is this I dont even
Nothing pro about quick scope especially as it was in mw2 just abusing the hit detection. Quick scoping is for MW leave it there please.
Back when BC2 first launched and games were full no one did long range sniping because no one understood it. I expect the games aren't close to max capacity now so basing judgement on the game now doesn't really make much sense. You missed the point. Like 6 months ago or whenever it was, you said it couldn't be done at all, and I can do it just fine. And I don't even have the GOL or Barrett yet.
Honestly I don't like playing any class other than Medic, but when I do decide to play Recon, I play it at close range. I don't get how no one could understand long range sniping.. Seems pretty intuitive to me. I'm pretty damn good at it too.. I had to prove to a friend that's not impossible to get a headshot on a moving target that's so far away he's nearly out of visual range. He was convinced it was impossible since he's so good at MW2 but failed as a sniper BC2.
|
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2026 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||