Sectumsempra said:
Gonna take what you say as best I can one piece at a time, whatever comes to mind first. --WHY was Bush so nonchalant about the whole ordeal (aka in the kindergarten class reading books despite the fact he was told the information of the airplanes crashing?) >>You don't want to create panic, especially amongst children. Why shatter their childhood by being the president who tells the little class of children that you have to go, the terrorists are attacking? That's the role of the parents. --WHY was the investigation closed and not pubicly revealed the details of the investigation? WHy the secrecy??? It's not like a secret weapon that the US came up with so that it can't be talked about on the TV (so possibly other nations can see it) >> Perhaps they finally learned to stop giving information where it's not needed. From what I hear, Clinton was the one who explained that to take down the towers you'd need to go by air, not by basement bombings. --WHY haven't they released (and hide the tapes) of the plane "crashing" into the Pentagon? >>See above. --WHY were these men flying the airplanes? >>As a country, we weren't fully "awake", I suppose, to the terrorist problem. We seemed to be at a lack of security then because we never knew the world could be so evil. --WHY were these men flying the airplanes? DO you seriously think airplane 3-5 hi-jackers can hold up a plane with box cutters? Seriously??? >>As I recall, there was no evidence of box cutters at all. The planes, being burned up and all at extremely high temperatures, had burned up mostly anything that COULD have been a weapon. They could have had scimitars or AK-47's for all we know. I may continue, I may not.
thanks for responding civily. this is all i wanted was some mature response back is all. but i want to pose some questions back to your responses that made me rememeber some thigns i left out.
you said that everythign was burned up in the plane's but why were the black boxes destroyed? (by their specs and material) they're supposed to be indestructible practically and a fire isn't going to destroy them. there's no way after all these years of crashes and black boxes surviving that this particular incidence the black boxes just "disappeared?"
my point about the hi-jackers were: how many ppl are on a flight and how many hi jackers were there? there was plenty of time for "something" possible. (im being subjective here now.)
with the question about being "awake" you are referring to civilians or armed forces? because there is the coast guard, the airforce, the army that CONSTANTLY checks the United States and watches its borders...why were they not there to stop the hi-jacking? (again being subjective and maybe a little emotional...)
why were they diverted EVEN THOUGH there was an alert that "terrorist" were planning to do somethign that day. years and years of the cia warning and never took them seriously. (and this has nothign to do now about anyone's administration because many administrations are responsible for this.) ok im just going to leave it at that. i didnt mean to rile up people's anger but i just want people to see other points not discussed.