Obama Being Stupid Again

If you don't vote, I personally don't think you have the right to complain.

Sad thing is we some how believe in this myth of our President actually runs the country is amazing. Every one well most every has bought into this american presidential BS. Obama does not control America in any shape or form and no american president has. Supprising as it may seem and actually most of you will refuse to believe it but a US president is only a liaison or better yet a figure head(puppet)for this country.
Predidents are used for scape goats Bush Obama Clinton Regan ect.... are all the same and take orders from Private Coperations and big buisness owners bankers ect.... ex. Rocafella's Kennedy's Morgan stanley
this list goes on. These people put the politicans in office who will push their personal adjendas. If you do a little reasearch or know anything about politics will understand this. Allowing the President to be seen as a leader and to give you the misconception that he actually make policies and has a tru say so as to who we war with send aid too ect... allows the people with "Old Money" to stay in power ( thats who actually runs america) and just switch up new faces(presidents) and run the "well i'll do better than the last guy" scam gimic all presidents run. Why because its their job to and thats why they are there to eat the ***when things go wrong. This is just a fact... This is just politics... reguardless of who you put in office... nothing will change
because... presidents do not have the power to change...... the country
only the people do....which a President is put in place to fool the people......

and the idea of a...*shudder*...President Palin...was horrifying and nightmarish.

time for troll cats

If you don't vote, I personally don't think you have the right to complain.

This.

and who gives a *** what matt damon thinks about politics, *** hollywood

Instead of crying about how he might have copied and pasted stuff from a wiki, you could do something that might help your argument, for example, going through and listing alternate viewpoints to the articles that he cited. Or some other evidence that further helps your viewpoint.

It's true, doesn't take much to copy and paste something. But all you bashing him for this are more or less saying "WTF you can't bring actual facts into this!?"

Instead you've just left the content of his post alone. Does this suggest you have no counterpoint? It certainly seems that way.

If you don't vote, I personally don't think you have the right to complain.

and who gives a *** what matt damon thinks about politics, *** hollywood

So a young child who had their parent(s) K.I.A has no right to an opinion on it?

A person who was left disabled as a War veteran (and as such, cannot leave the house) has no right to an opinion?

Everyone has equal opinions when it comes to the wellbeing of their country. Admittedly, only a select few are listened to.

But actors always tell the truth! We should listen to them! What they say matters!

Everyone has a right to their own opinion, even Matt Damon even though I thought his last film was ***.

(Side-note: Which one was that? Last I remember is the Bourne movie.)

I used to agree with this mentality, but seeing how U.S. politics is such smoke and mirrors now warms me up to the idea of uninformed citizens staying out of it altogether. Of course this will never work because all sides need their one-issue zombie voters to pack on the numbers, but still, in theory it'd be nice.

I had a general respect for McCain, but the whole Palin thing deterred me from voting that way. It was pretty insulting to bring her out and say she knows what she's doing. If you're going to lie to me in the normal political way, please do it well. lol

He could quite easily say "who gives a *** about what these ffxiah people think about politics, *** FFXI" Everyone has a right to their own opinion, even Matt Damon even though I thought his last film was ***.

This thread is moot, going to eat dinner and smoke a fatty

I just wanted to say that Bart and Pikachu have made this thread very enjoyable, so thank you both for making my day at work funnier. Ok back to the flaming and such.

So a company makes a product. The product is reasonably good. Along comes someone with a business degree. They propose that if they remove feature X, it will save them 10 cents per unit, and roughly $400,000 over the course of the year as they produce and sell many of these products.

The person with the business degree estimates the impact of the removal of the feature, showing that it isn't used very often, and shouldn't change the overall quality of the product.

The business major is given corporate high-fives all around, and a fat bonus paycheck, as profit margins increase as expected.

The feature in question is a self-diagnostic that can be used to determine specific failures with the complex product, making resolving issues with the product faster and more accurate. Problems with the product naturally occur over the lifetime, and so support calls are made - inaccurate diagnostics result, higher costs of replacing various parts and extended troubleshooting ensue, and the customer is left feeling like their product is garbage. Because it is.

The diagnostic indicator in question was used quite frequently - but proving something that's common sense as that was difficult at best, and in the case of Mr. Executive (we'll call him), not only did this not matter, but this would impede his plan to get paid fat sacks of cash. Quality impact? Not accurately measurable, so we're going to just say it's zero. Oh, and fire the engineers who argued that removing the diagnostics would cause increased support cost and decreased customer satisfaction.

Eventually, this grievous error in design change is regarded internally as a major failure, and setback for the company. Satisfaction dropped, support costs outweighed the savings from originally removing it, and the decision had to be reversed, all at cost to the company. Other business majors had to plot out the math, and demonstrate completely why this plan had failed so miserably, costing the company more money and man hours.

Mr. Executive isn't at the company, but that's not because he was fired for making bad decisions - he left the company as it was reporting increased revenue and sales from the cheaper products, hopping to a new company to start the process anew. As far as his resume and future are concerned, he had a successful profit-increasing project, and was an executive at a large company while it was doing well. In fact, he left and now they're doing worse! Surely he is an excellent employee.

===

Honestly, it's not the corporations that really create problems for consumers, employees, and the economy. It's the shitheads with buisness degrees that sit around thinking of ways to use *** statistics to try and justify their bonuses, performance-related pay, or job advancements with complete disregard for whether or not the process changes they're putting in place are going to be good for the business and the customers in the long run.

Maybe you'd run a business well - maybe you'd put your foot down on someone like that in your organization. Either way, your business degree doesn't means ***to me.

Also, yay Obama.

I just wanted to say that Bart and Pikachu have made this thread very enjoyable, so thank you both for making my day at work funnier. Ok back to the flaming and such.

So a young child who had their parent(s) K.I.A has no right to an opinion on it?

A person who was left disabled as a War veteran (and as such, cannot leave the house) has no right to an opinion?

Everyone has equal opinions when it comes to the wellbeing of their country. Admittedly, only a select few are listened to.