November 2024 Version Update

Language: JP EN DE FR
2010-09-08
New Items
users online
Forum » FFXI » General » November 2024 Version Update
November 2024 Version Update
 Asura.Eiryl
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2024-11-14 23:15:05
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Clearly they feel the same way, cause it's been a problem from day one and they've given zero *** about it.

Even so far as saying they'll fix it, and then doing exactly; not that.
 Carbuncle.Nynja
Offline
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: NynJa
Posts: 3906
By Carbuncle.Nynja 2024-11-14 23:40:27
Link | Quote | Reply
 
People "figuring the game out" arent supertanking multiple mobs that can kill them quicker than Eiryl dies on the first floor in Sheol A. Putting their weapon away for 1 second wont get them killed.
Offline
Posts: 2535
By Nariont 2024-11-15 02:28:40
Link | Quote | Reply
 
More just a general annoyance than anything, I like AT when its just a bunch of melee mobs and im the only one dealing with them, everywhere else its kept off for the aforementioned scenarios, a toggle to make it proximity based shouldnt be that large a hurdle
 Phoenix.Iocus
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
user: androwe
Posts: 1518
By Phoenix.Iocus 2024-11-15 06:12:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Like they only need a config option that says lowest HP or closest. Already way better than we have it now. We would all pick closest. If someone hates the new system, the old one is still there.

Both options depend on your positioning your character so the target options are in your LoS.

Obviously a more robust system that worked correctly would be ideal.
 Shiva.Thorny
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Rairin
Posts: 2788
By Shiva.Thorny 2024-11-15 06:47:37
Link | Quote | Reply
 
If I were designing it, and I wanted to satisfy you bunch of apes, I would add a command that lets you select your next auto-target based on name or id. Then, you can make a <stnpc> macro to manually pick what you want most before your current mob dies. Or, someone can make an addon that does exactly what you want.

It's low-effort to implement (one command that stores one variable on server and checks it before the current logic). It includes vanilla players appropriately. Addons meet every criteria that the nitpickers could dream up. Done.
Offline
Posts: 1138
By Seun 2024-11-15 08:44:57
Link | Quote | Reply
 
_addon.name = 'Manual'
_addon.version = '1.1'
_addon.author = 'Thorny (Shiva)'

I will help you test that, my gorilla.


I think I understand what this is really about though. 'Poorly designed AT' is cope for people who boff their TP on mobs that are out of range. That and/or they lack the frame perfect execution to beat JA0, so they're forced to leave it on.

How about we just remove the TP penalty and call it good? I feel like none of the other beef is filling and the time would really be better spent on any of the things listed in the recent survey.
[+]
 Asura.Eiryl
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2024-11-15 08:49:24
Link | Quote | Reply
 
That would be enough to placate most. Lost tp out of range was also something they promised to fix. And didn't.

It's a band-aid on an amputation though. It doesn't cover the whole problem.

People min/max 1 dps. Manually retargetting and/or disengaging is a huge dps loss. It's not that hard to see that it's a desired fix.
(yes fix, not alteration, because it's improper function)
Offline
By Dodik 2024-11-15 10:06:19
Link | Quote | Reply
 
It's a relic of the time when fights took 10+ min and fighting more than one mob at a time was a death sentence.

The game got faster, but targetting and engaging hasn't. As a result, the gameplay suffers.

There is an addon called AutoTargetAssist that attempts to fix this, but it's not instant like the built in auto-target, it basically re-engages on a new target quicker than doing it manually.
[+]
 Shiva.Thorny
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Rairin
Posts: 2788
By Shiva.Thorny 2024-11-15 10:28:11
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Seun said: »
I will help you test that, my gorilla.
The reason the existing addons are subpar is because the server handles target selection and does not actually send it to the client in real time. When you combine this with the poor performance in instances, anything solely client side will be unstable. I don't write for windower to begin with, but a correct implementation of an improved autotarget must incorporate the server to be reliable.

Seun said: »
they lack the frame perfect execution to beat JA0, so they're forced to leave it on.
Frame perfect execution isn't good enough, because it's actually a server driven race condition. If you hit switch target and it reaches the server after your target dies, the server can still send the packet indicating autotarget was processed and cause your client to switch to the autotargeted monster. This is only a problem when instance performance is dipping, so it's mostly an Asura issue, but still wanted to point out that it's not just skill-based.

Seun said: »
How about we just remove the TP penalty and call it good? I feel like none of the other beef is filling
I don't think the tp penalty is the main/only concern. You have your delay reset, you lose damage, and you have to press additional buttons[seems most DPS players prefer to do this as little as possible].

My proposed system would allow addons (like AutoTargetAssist) to actually work correctly and keep your weapon delay and engage window up. Any solely client side system does not reliably accomplish that.
[+]
 Phoenix.Iocus
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
user: androwe
Posts: 1518
By Phoenix.Iocus 2024-11-15 16:19:59
Link | Quote | Reply
 
You can avoid dropping tp by having a distance check in your luas. The first one goes anywhere in the lua, you just need to define target_distance. I believe that number changes based on your race and maybe even your model size. 3.5 works for small elvaan (f). You can fiddle with it with things like urganites that don't move and figure out your number pretty easily.
Code
function user_setup()

target_distance = 3.5 -- Set Racial Distance Here --

end


Then you just call it during pretarget. This way if the mob is small or huge, it will still know that you're in the right area to not drop tp. I saw a version of this that worked very poorly against large mob types in other people's luas.
Code
function job_pretarget(spell, action, spellMap, eventArgs)
    if spell.type == "WeaponSkill" and spell.target.distance > (target_distance + spell.target.model_size) then -- Cancel WS If You Are Out Of Range --
       eventArgs.cancel=true
       add_to_chat(123, spell.name..' Canceled: [Out of Range]')
       return
    end
end


It still won't save your tp if your mob is actively being aggressively yanked around by a healer/tank or if the instance is super laggy but otherwise it works pretty well.
[+]
 Carbuncle.Nynja
Offline
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: NynJa
Posts: 3906
By Carbuncle.Nynja 2024-11-15 17:27:33
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Wont that *** up on larger targets like Mireu or whatever unless you are all up in their business?
 Phoenix.Iocus
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
user: androwe
Posts: 1518
By Phoenix.Iocus 2024-11-15 22:11:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
No, again:

Quote:
This way if the mob is small or huge, it will still know that you're in the right area to not drop tp. I saw a version of this that worked very poorly against large mob types in other people's luas.

that's what spell.target.model_size does in the statement. Without it, you get the janky problems with large mobs.
Log in to post.