Random Politics & Religion #39: Guac Is Extra |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #39: Guac is extra
Reminder: There is no official record that nausi has ever linked.
Quote: CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty officers and NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. Quote: ... a whistle-blower complaint referred to “the official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced—as is customary—by the White House Situation Room,” suggesting that a verbatim transcript does exist. The complaint also noted that records of the call were closely guarded and kept out of circulation, a claim that has been substantiated by reporting since. In three places in the transcript, an ellipsis (a series of three dots) is used. That’s typically a marking that indicates where part of a conversation has been removed. The White House says the ellipses represent places where the speaker trailed off or paused, but current and former officials told The Washington Post that standard practice in such situations is to use dashes or “[inaudible]” in such cases.... .pdf of the transcript TLDR: there is a verbatim transcript. We haven't seen it. Garuda.Chanti said: » Quote: CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty officers and NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. Quote: ... a whistle-blower complaint referred to “the official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced—as is customary—by the White House Situation Room,” suggesting that a verbatim transcript does exist. The complaint also noted that records of the call were closely guarded and kept out of circulation, a claim that has been substantiated by reporting since. In three places in the transcript, an ellipsis (a series of three dots) is used. That’s typically a marking that indicates where part of a conversation has been removed. The White House says the ellipses represent places where the speaker trailed off or paused, but current and former officials told The Washington Post that standard practice in such situations is to use dashes or “[inaudible]” in such cases.... .pdf of the transcript TLDR: there is a verbatim transcript. We haven't seen it. I can't wait to read that transcript. I'm going to take notes too. I love to use ellipses...I have never have to finish a sentence...
Speaking of punctuation:
Trump walked down the street exclamation point ! He put on a sweater ! He drank a diet coke ! YouTube Video Placeholder
Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Nausi said: » I back up all my claims with reason and evidence. Nausi said: » The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it. Okay, provide a credible link to your source that show that the crimes do not exist. (The transcript is the official record) It is! I have linked it before. Are you contesting that it isn’t? Whats your source? Precisely my point. You make a claim, without a link or sources, and then make others disprove your claim but requiring that they cite sources. Unbelievable. I only post Yahoo news links the most trusted name in PnR politics. Newsflash this is the lowest form of "discussion" on the internet even the Youtube comments occasionally have a point.
There is no point if you guys made a point it would be a shitty one that says. lol source or post a link or some other ***. This is the internet not a term paper that requires citation. Any links or sources posts probably aren't going to be clicked on.
But go ahead post your dumb link if it makes you happen. Kamala Harris is right behind him.
Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: » fonewear said: » Newsflash this is the lowest form of "discussion" on the internet even the Youtube comments occasionally have a point. There is no point if you guys made a point it would be a shitty one that says. lol source or post a link or some other ***. This is the internet not a term paper that requires citation. If you want to rise above this and if you truly look down on it so much, argue your points better than just pettiness and mockery. If you continue to choose not to, then stop bitching about the result of your actions. So super cereal. Looks like we need to reintroduce Fone and Josi. I don't think Josi understands who he's dealing with. Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: » fonewear said: » Newsflash this is the lowest form of "discussion" on the internet even the Youtube comments occasionally have a point. There is no point if you guys made a point it would be a shitty one that says. lol source or post a link or some other ***. This is the internet not a term paper that requires citation. If you want to rise above this and if you truly look down on it so much, argue your points better than just pettiness and mockery. If you continue to choose not to, then stop bitching about the result of your actions. Thank you Donny for your contributions. Anything else you would like to add ? Garuda.Chanti said: » Damn I really thought he was going to win to. Why should I try to elevate the discussion when the other users contribute nothing ?
This isn't my passion project. I'm not going to demand they post links or sources. In fact I rather them post anything but articles and sources. Post something funny who gives a ***. If we aren't going to learn anything at least let's have a laugh. fonewear said: » Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: » fonewear said: » Newsflash this is the lowest form of "discussion" on the internet even the Youtube comments occasionally have a point. There is no point if you guys made a point it would be a shitty one that says. lol source or post a link or some other ***. This is the internet not a term paper that requires citation. If you want to rise above this and if you truly look down on it so much, argue your points better than just pettiness and mockery. If you continue to choose not to, then stop bitching about the result of your actions. Thank you Donny for your contributions. Anything else you would like to add ? YouTube Video Placeholder
Mostly it is just people arguing with Nausi.
If Nausi stopped posting Vic and his protege would probably go *** on some other forum. I said before in another post but "I don't have to prove anything to you internet strangers"
Certainly not going to hold random dorks on the internet to professor level of scrutiny.
fonewear said: » If we aren't going to learn anything at least let's have a laugh. That philosophy got me through college. Honestly the back and forth arguments are the equivalent of
No you ! lol at you No you ! Repeat till the thread gets locked. Beto may be out, but his arms still have the energy to run several more campaigns entirely on their own.
Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: » fonewear said: » Mostly it is just people arguing with Nausi. If Nausi stopped posting Vic and his protege would probably go *** on some other forum. they've both blocked people they don't agree with though, so you might have a point. I don't block people that I "don't agree with". I've been here for years and bantered with all sorts of people all over the political spectrum and haven't blocked any of them. Oz is something else entirely. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||