Speaking of pointless books.
I guess the anonymous whistle blower wrote a book.
You bet your silly *** I can't wait to read it.
Random Politics & Religion #39: Guac Is Extra
Random Politics & Religion #39: Guac is extra
All this boils down to is yet another nothing burger which lefties will point to and say “See! Orange man bad!”. Only to have everyone say in response “wrong!”
The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it.
The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it.
Nausi said: »
All this boils down to is yet another nothing burger which lefties will point to and say “See! Orange man bad!”. Only to have everyone say in response “wrong!”
The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it.
The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it.
facts I don't like.
[+]
Viciouss said: »
Not sure where you are getting that 12 people were on the call, but we have only hear testimony from one, and yea, I see no reason not to believe a decorated war vet testifying under oath. His description of the process of generating the transcript lines up with what has been described by former officials.
This is a double standard though. Flinn was a decorated war hero too and you guys crucified him. Mattis as well.
Can't have it both ways.
[+]
Odin.Slore said: »
Viciouss said: »
Not sure where you are getting that 12 people were on the call, but we have only hear testimony from one, and yea, I see no reason not to believe a decorated war vet testifying under oath. His description of the process of generating the transcript lines up with what has been described by former officials.
This is a double standard though. Flinn was a decorated war hero too and you guys crucified him. Mattis as well.
Can't have it both ways.
Flynn and Mattis? First of all no one "crucified" Mattis, other than Trump. Flynn was busted, repeatedly, for his own acts of wrongdoing. There is no double standard when it comes to Vindman, who did nothing wrong at all, hasn't even been accused of wrongdoing by anyone, and Mike Flynn.
Lol all they have is “reeeeeee”.
Washington post, outrightly lied yesterday regarding the NSC guy’s testimony. He did not corroborate Schiffs narrative, he contradicted it.
Their own news media is blatantly lying to them.
Washington post, outrightly lied yesterday regarding the NSC guy’s testimony. He did not corroborate Schiffs narrative, he contradicted it.
Their own news media is blatantly lying to them.
[+]
The only person that has been outright lying about this topic is nausi. Every post has been easily disproven.
[+]
Viciouss said: »
The only person that has been outright lying about this topic is nausi. Every post has been easily disproven.
Except you rarely offer a source or anything to back up your "disproving/debunking". This is how it usually goes:
1. Nausi says something.
2. You say "Nuh uh."
3. You brag about how you "disproved/debunked" him.
Sorry bud, but that's not how that works.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
The only person that has been outright lying about this topic is nausi. Every post has been easily disproven.
Except you rarely offer a source or anything to back up your "disproving/debunking". This is how it usually goes:
1. Nausi says something.
2. You say "Nuh uh."
3. You brag about how you "disproved/debunked" him.
Sorry bud, but that's not how that works.
BS...if Nausi makes a claim, it is up to him to back it up, show a source. It isn't everyone else's responsibility to disprove the claim he is making. That's just ridiculous.
[+]
Now, there's nothing wrong with asking Nausi to back up a claim with a source, but offering a completely opposite counter claim with no source defeats the entire purpose. Saying "prove it" is a far better tactic than "you're wrong, take my word for it!"
[+]
Odin.Slore said: »
Viciouss said: »
Not sure where you are getting that 12 people were on the call, but we have only hear testimony from one, and yea, I see no reason not to believe a decorated war vet testifying under oath. His description of the process of generating the transcript lines up with what has been described by former officials.
This is a double standard though. Flinn was a decorated war hero too and you guys crucified him. Mattis as well.
Can't have it both ways.
Someone’s told them they can just call that “whataboutism” and continue to be hypocrites.
I back up all my claims with reason and evidence.
Responses consisting of simple “facts I don't like” without following analysis and rational arguments are brushed off and laughed at.
That isn't how arguments work. We’re all shocked those people made it out of 6th grade.
Responses consisting of simple “facts I don't like” without following analysis and rational arguments are brushed off and laughed at.
That isn't how arguments work. We’re all shocked those people made it out of 6th grade.
Ragnarok.Ozment said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
The only person that has been outright lying about this topic is nausi. Every post has been easily disproven.
Except you rarely offer a source or anything to back up your "disproving/debunking". This is how it usually goes:
1. Nausi says something.
2. You say "Nuh uh."
3. You brag about how you "disproved/debunked" him.
Sorry bud, but that's not how that works.
BS...if Nausi makes a claim, it is up to him to back it up, show a source. It isn't everyone else's responsibility to disprove the claim he is making. That's just ridiculous.
Which is exactly why it's so easy to debunk him. It takes almost no effort to pick apart whatever garbage tweet he read
[+]
Viciouss said: »
Which is exactly why it's so easy to debunk him. It takes almost no effort to pick apart whatever garbage tweet he read
Wow, way to completely miss the point I just made. It's almost like you want to think you're superior to Nausi but you're so lazy that you end up doing everything you accuse him of doing.
Nausi said: »
I back up all my claims with reason and evidence.
This absolutely never happens. It's hilarious to read tho.
Nausi said: »
I back up all my claims with reason and evidence.
Nausi said: »
The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it.
Okay, provide a credible link to your source that show that the crimes do not exist.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Which is exactly why it's so easy to debunk him. It takes almost no effort to pick apart whatever garbage tweet he read
Wow, way to completely miss the point I just made. It's almost like you want to think you're superior to Nausi but you're so lazy that you end up doing everything you accuse him of doing.
You didn't make a point, so there was nothing to miss.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Now, there's nothing wrong with asking Nausi to back up a claim with a source, but offering a completely opposite counter claim with no source defeats the entire purpose. Saying "prove it" is a far better tactic than "you're wrong, take my word for it!"
We have tried that for years. It doesn't work. He never posts evidence.
Viciouss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Which is exactly why it's so easy to debunk him. It takes almost no effort to pick apart whatever garbage tweet he read
Wow, way to completely miss the point I just made. It's almost like you want to think you're superior to Nausi but you're so lazy that you end up doing everything you accuse him of doing.
You didn't make a point, so there was nothing to miss.
The point is you don't back up any of your crap claims either and you know it. Seriously, there is nothing that you say that Nausi does that you don't do yourself, so stop spending 50% of your posts whining about him.
[+]
Viciouss said: »
Prime example, no evidence has been posted by nausi how the transcript was created. It's been posted by other people, but never once nausi.
Ragnarok.Ozment said: »
Nausi said: »
I back up all my claims with reason and evidence.
Nausi said: »
The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it.
Okay, provide a credible link to your source that show that the crimes do not exist.
Lets parse this sentence.
(The transcript is the official record)
It is! I have linked it before.
Are you contesting that it isn’t? Whats your source?
Secondly, Ive repeatedly asked what crimes have been committed to no response. I can’t prove a crime wasn’t committed, and its not my obligation to prove he didn’t )”(not how law works). Its your obligation to provide some evidence a crime was committed and acknowledge what crime it was.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Which is exactly why it's so easy to debunk him. It takes almost no effort to pick apart whatever garbage tweet he read
Wow, way to completely miss the point I just made. It's almost like you want to think you're superior to Nausi but you're so lazy that you end up doing everything you accuse him of doing.
You didn't make a point, so there was nothing to miss.
The point is you don't back up any of your crap claims either and you know it. Seriously, there is nothing that you say that Nausi does that you don't do yourself, so stop spending 50% of your posts whining about him.
[+]
Nausi said: »
Ragnarok.Ozment said: »
Nausi said: »
I back up all my claims with reason and evidence.
Nausi said: »
The transcript is the official record, it has not been “edited” to cover up crimes, these so called crimes do not exist and lefties can’t handle it.
Okay, provide a credible link to your source that show that the crimes do not exist.
(The transcript is the official record)
It is! I have linked it before.
Are you contesting that it isn’t? Whats your source?
Precisely my point. You make a claim, without a link or sources, and then make others disprove your claim but requiring that they cite sources. Unbelievable.
[+]
Ive linked the transcript before.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
[+]
Nausi said: »
Ive linked the transcript before.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
Everyone has linked the transcript, which is literally titled as a memorandum, and has a disclaimer describing how the memo was compiled, and is not an official record. This is just an example of nausi trying to wiggle out of having to post a source. Not fooling anyone, except Rav apparently.
[+]
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Ive linked the transcript before.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
Everyone has linked the transcript, which is literally titled as a memorandum, and has a disclaimer describing how the memo was compiled, and is not an official record. This is just an example of nausi trying to wiggle out of having to post a source. Not fooling anyone, except Rav apparently.
You're wrong.
Boom, debunked again. So easy.
[+]
Meanwhile. Obama intel community self identifies itself as the deep state, and admit they’re trying to throw Trump out of office.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Ive linked the transcript before.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
You are countering that claim without posting your own evidence. Then when i point out your own claim doesn’t actually support your side, you just spaz out.
Everyone has linked the transcript, which is literally titled as a memorandum, and has a disclaimer describing how the memo was compiled, and is not an official record. This is just an example of nausi trying to wiggle out of having to post a source. Not fooling anyone, except Rav apparently.
You're wrong.
Boom, debunked again. So easy.
Sounds like Vuc is trying to assert there is some other official record, and yet not linking to it, as I have done.
Boom!
You’re right. This IS easy.
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.