Random Politics & Religion #39: Guac Is Extra

So what exactly are you saying happened?

Witness testified that he didnt feel like the phone call was right.

Witness testified that he didnt feel like the phone call was right.

Didn't I say they were doing that a few pages ago. Anything coming from Schiff should be considered a 2020 election campaign advertisement. He meets with the "witnesses" tells them what to say and how to say it. Then during testimony coach's them along and to keep on script. At this point Democrats got no chance of this even being looked at by the Senate.

That btw is the power the Senate has. They can just announce they don't intend to even consider any recommendations the house makes as it's obviously tainted. The entire reason for a bipartisan panel to conduct the inspection is to guarantee it doesn't become suspect.

He's an evil democrat preparing a coup to overthrow the chosen one.

A Republican congressman on Wednesday confirmed Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman told impeachment investigators that at least two portions of the July phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky were omitted from the summary of the conversation released by the White House.

“Yeah, he testified that in two occasions the ellipses, the dot-dot-dot, should have been some words,” Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) told NPR....

Alexander and his twin brother Yevgeny came to America from Ukraine

You do know Vidman is from Ukraine right? His family came over from Kyiv in late 70's I think the article says.


Maybe a slight conflict of interest here. I am not sure. We have one person saying things were omitted and a ton saying they weren't. The President said no quid... Ukraine President says no quid. Whistleblower 1 or 2 never mentioned a word about anything being omitted.

Sounds like dems whistleblower ***didn't pan out when WH released transcript so now we have "discovered" another attempted crime that no one can collaborate except this one guy.

Sounds fishy to me.

As Donald Trump gets dragged deeper, and deeper, and deeper into his Ukraine scandal and the impeachment inquiry accelerates toward a likely House vote before the year’s end, the president is increasingly insistent that, if he wanted to commit a crime, he wouldn’t be stupid enough to get caught.

At other times, Trump has privately avowed that if he wanted to commit the crimes or outrageous actions he’s accused of, he’d be smart enough to do it—and that people should stop saying he’s too dumb or incompetent to do crimes.

Last week, the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal launched a novel defense of Trump, who Democratic lawmakers allege—as Capitol Hill testimony from senior administration officials suggests—attempted to force the Ukrainian government to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a top political rival of Trump’s, in exchange for military aid that was being held up. The newspaper’s esteemed board argued that any talk of impeaching Trump is silly, in large part, because this president is likely too bumbling to execute that kind of scandalous quid pro quo....