Post deleted by User.
Random Politics & Religion #34
Random Politics & Religion #34
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Academic source with plenty of citations. This isn't new research.
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html
tldr it's pointless to describe a pedo as homo or heterosexual since the attraction is about age and not necessarily the gender of the kid. Access to a child is a major determinant. Nausi's not gonna provide anything to back up his post because his *** was debunked decades ago.
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html
Quote:
As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).
Quote:
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.
Quote:
For the present discussion, the important point is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals – who are often characterized as fixated – are attracted to children, not to men or women.
Calling all pedo *** come here to provide your sexual orientation...FFXIAH needs your input !
[+]
fonewear said: »
FFXIAH needs your input
I disagree... I don't even understand the point of the "inferior culture" derail that led up to that Freudian field day.
[+]
Freud had a obsession with his mother...probably spent too much time watching Psycho. That and his dad was probably an alcoholic that beat his mother.
Pic above: (from left to right): Otto Rank, Sigmund Freud, Karl Abraham, Max Eitingon, Sándor Ferenczi, Ernest Jones, and Hanns Sachs
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
Don’t forget your roots and that you are inside a nation of mostly immigrants from other nations, after slaughtering the locals to steal that land.
This rhetoric is getting old. The "locals" were slaughtering each other over the same land long before the evil white man ever showed up. It's also a counterproductive argument, because you're basically saying:
'Hey, you know how your ancestors invaded and conquered a foreign nation? Out of kindness you should allow others to do the same to you."
The notion that territory belonged to whoever was strong enough to take it (and hold it) was just a fact of life. It's pointless to place your 21st century liberal ideals on people who lived centuries ago, and nobody has any obligation to try and undo their actions.
[+]
Candlejack said: »
I'd stake money, based on his behavior, descent of some form of western European, more than likely white as a ghost, and would harm himself if he took a DNA test.
Only if I found out that you and I are closely related.
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
The truth of the history was, the respective nations of aboriginals on this continent back then had well defined borders
Patently false. The aboriginals have a LONG history, and borders shifted constantly throughout the years.
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
while they still fought, genocide was avoided.
Patently false. You know that tribe that existed but you've never heard of it? That's right, because it was annihilated and no record of it exists.
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
Nausi said: »
Keeping out inferior cultures is in everyone's best interest.
Rating cultures on their level of superiority is an vague inaccurate way of viewing humanity that will only serve to engender closed-minded thinking.
Don’t forget your roots and that you are inside a nation of mostly immigrants from other nations, after slaughtering the locals to steal that land.
Imagine if your ancestors were kept out of that land on the grounds that your culture was deemed inferior at the time. Unless your people are indigenous to the region than I’m incorrect.
All cultures are not equal, they never have been. Promoting one’s culure has been by conquest and the eradication of aggresor outgroups is part of human biology. The massive flaw in the multiculturalism mindset is thinking that imported cultures will somehow not act out in the same tribalistic manners that they always have. The left literally imports incompatible people thinking that by being here they will somehow adopt an ideology.
It’s like thinking that if you put a short person on a basketball team, they will somehow grow taller.
Today the collective internet conglomerates have effectively censored the political speech of Alex Jones.
The left is not compatible with the idea of free speech one bit.
The left is not compatible with the idea of free speech one bit.
Nausi said: »
Today the collective internet conglomerates have effectively censored the political speech of Alex Jones.
The left is not compatible with the idea of free speech one bit.
The left is not compatible with the idea of free speech one bit.
Social Media Companies are not the government, it’s not a free speech issue.
[+]
Conspiracy theorists have to stick together.
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
I’ll reword the idea for you Rav.
Most countries commit atrocities and/or genocides in human history, yours and mine included.
The dangerous part is when a citizen starts viewing their history or countries’ atrocities as justified and somehow less atrocious. That is brainwashing and that kind of closed minded thinking causes more atrocities perpetuated.
It’s all inexcusable. Period. It doesn’t matter if “Well the Indians fought between themselves anyway” or “well japan attacked first” regarding concentration camps or atomic weapons.
Most countries commit atrocities and/or genocides in human history, yours and mine included.
The dangerous part is when a citizen starts viewing their history or countries’ atrocities as justified and somehow less atrocious. That is brainwashing and that kind of closed minded thinking causes more atrocities perpetuated.
It’s all inexcusable. Period. It doesn’t matter if “Well the Indians fought between themselves anyway” or “well japan attacked first” regarding concentration camps or atomic weapons.
Yes and no. There have been many times in history where war was practically synonymous with survival. If someone is actively trying to destroy you, you are absolutely justified in waging war. War is a very complicated thing, though, and you will never get out of it without doing something that will be frowned upon by the bleeding heart crowd.
[+]
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.