Vote against Klobuchar, she holds public office but doesn't drink herself into a coma.
Pretty good evidence she's bat ***insane.
Random Politics & Religion #34
Random Politics & Religion #34
Im betting that murkowski, collins, and flake come out and say if the vote happens tomorrow they are a No. They want more witnesses to testify and they want the fbi to investigate. They dont care about the theatrics or the alt right spin machine.
Zerowone said: »
Never heard of cross examination aye?
If he loses his temper like he was starting to; along with the evasiveness...it’s not a good look.
If he loses his temper like he was starting to; along with the evasiveness...it’s not a good look.
Most people would get angry over that.
[+]
Viciouss said: »
Im betting that murkowski, collins, and flake come out and say if the vote happens tomorrow they are a No. They want more witnesses to testify and they want the fbi to investigate. They dont care about the theatrics or the alt right spin machine.
Apparently Vic completely missed the memo on what the FBI actually does. I'd recommend going back and watching the video, it's pointed out 347 times by people who actually have a clue (i.e. not the people you like).
[+]
Anna Ruthven said: »
If you want to convince me you're being honest, you answer a yes or no question, no matter how unfair you think it is, with yes or no. You don't dodge the question and go off on a tangent, people do this under oath to not lie but not tell the truth, it's quite honestly the absolute easiest way to *** your way through such situations.
[+]
Nausi said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
If you want to convince me you're being honest, you answer a yes or no question, no matter how unfair you think it is, with yes or no. You don't dodge the question and go off on a tangent, people do this under oath to not lie but not tell the truth, it's quite honestly the absolute easiest way to *** your way through such situations.
It's a very common tactic in public hearings. Give them a loaded question, force them to answer yes or no when either response makes them look bad, then call them on evasiveness when they refuse.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Im betting that murkowski, collins, and flake come out and say if the vote happens tomorrow they are a No. They want more witnesses to testify and they want the fbi to investigate. They dont care about the theatrics or the alt right spin machine.
Apparently Vic completely missed the memo on what the FBI actually does. I'd recommend going back and watching the video, it's pointed out 347 times by people who actually have a clue (i.e. not the people you like).
Those 3 senators dont care about the excuses being given.
-Mr kavanaugh, did you not not not rape this girl?
-I’ll refer you to my prev....
-let the record show he didn’t answer yes or no.
-I’ll refer you to my prev....
-let the record show he didn’t answer yes or no.
[+]
Viciouss said: »
Im betting that murkowski, collins, and flake come out and say if the vote happens tomorrow they are a No. They want more witnesses to testify and they want the fbi to investigate. They dont care about the theatrics or the alt right spin machine.
At his rate i wouldnt be surprised if several democrats vote for him.
[+]
Please go back a couple pages and read that story I posted about the fundraiser if you have any doubts this isn't a political sham. Minds are made up long before Kavanough even got there. Makes me sick.
[+]
The committee even started ripping difi for leaking this *** in the first place.
Musta been that chinese spy that was on rher payroll.
Musta been that chinese spy that was on rher payroll.
[+]
They really want to get rid of that double sovereignty this October-November.
Dual Sovereignty *
Odin.Slore said: »
Please go back a couple pages and read that story I posted about the fundraiser if you have any doubts this isn't a political sham. Minds are made up long before Kavanough even got there. Makes me sick.
They likely have files on every prospective candidate loaded with a sexual assault allegation. They just chose the round and fire it at the nominee.
Anna Ruthven said: »
If you want to convince me you're being honest, you answer a yes or no question, no matter how unfair you think it is, with yes or no. You don't dodge the question and go off on a tangent, people do this under oath to not lie but not tell the truth, it's quite honestly the absolute easiest way to *** your way through such situations.
Do you intent to continue supporting child rapists?
It's a Yes or No question, just say yes or no.
Asura.Saevel said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
If you want to convince me you're being honest, you answer a yes or no question, no matter how unfair you think it is, with yes or no. You don't dodge the question and go off on a tangent, people do this under oath to not lie but not tell the truth, it's quite honestly the absolute easiest way to *** your way through such situations.
Do you intent to continue supporting child rapists?
It's a Yes or No question, just say yes or no.
Anna Ruthven said: »
Asura.Saevel said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
If you want to convince me you're being honest, you answer a yes or no question, no matter how unfair you think it is, with yes or no. You don't dodge the question and go off on a tangent, people do this under oath to not lie but not tell the truth, it's quite honestly the absolute easiest way to *** your way through such situations.
Do you intent to continue supporting child rapists?
It's a Yes or No question, just say yes or no.
Why being so evasive, it's a yes or no question.
Done.
I said no. From what I've been told, you're repeating this "child rapist" thing as an insult to another user. This falls well beyond the line of jokes and in the realm of libel. Don't do that in the next RP+R.
I said no. From what I've been told, you're repeating this "child rapist" thing as an insult to another user. This falls well beyond the line of jokes and in the realm of libel. Don't do that in the next RP+R.
[+]
We called him out on it the other night, but he is such a pathetic person that he has most of us blocked. Oh well, he was given fair warning.
Nausi said: »
Omg get over yourself, he’s making a satirical point.
It’s a topic ban and we’re at page 134.
#35 is long over due.
#chill.
[+]
I think he's talking about James Gunn btw, the director of Guardians of the Galaxy who made some bad joke tweets like 10 years ago.
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.