Random Politics & Religion #23 (Fake News)

Sure.

Oh, wait!

Kennedy: shot
Lincoln: shot
Garfield: shot
McKinley: shot
R Kennedy: shot
TR: shot (lived)
Reagan: shot (lived)
Gabby Giffords: shot (lived)

Obviously Trump meant on the whole. And don't assume for a moment that the same thing wouldn't happen to Trump if he didn't have all that pesky security. People are deranged.

Oh just wait, the implosion will reach all new highs in a few months. All these "investigations" are doing is giving Liberals more false hope which just serves to make the anger phase even worse. They need to get past their grief on losing the election and get all that hate and rage out of their system.

If we had real justice in this world the people leaking all this stuff would be in jail. But that won't happen. They will get a job on CNN.

its not happened in my experience

They can't even get all of the Democrat Senators on board with the idea of a 2/3 impeachment vote, let alone the required number of Republicans.

I really don't know why that is hard to understand. It's like people lack basic understanding of government.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/smoking-gun-comey-testified-oathtrump-never-pressured-fbi-halt-investigations/

There the testimony. I can't imagine how Vic missed it.

There the testimony. I can't imagine how Vic missed it.

Comey never made that testimony, it's purely a fabrication of radical extremist Trump supports who need suppressed and defeated in order to continue to pursuit of the Divine Just Revolution.

Betcha at least half of all liberals think Hillary would get the presidency of Trump was impeached.

She'd surely give out TWOSCOOPS to her guests!

“April 10, 2016 — President Obama said Sunday that Hillary Clinton showed ‘carelessness’ by using a private email server, but he also strongly defended his former secretary of state, saying she did not endanger national security…”

It goes counter to what he wants to believe happened.

Haven't you figured it out yet? If Vic doesn't like it, it never existed in his mind.

Interesting fact: Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy, and Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln. Both secretaries warned the assassinated presidents not to go to where they wound up shot to death.

This is one of those coincidences that isn’t a coincidence at all; it’s simply wrong. John Kennedy did have a secretary named Evelyn Lincoln (who may or may not have warned him about going to Dallas), but one searches in vain to find a Lincoln secretary named Kennedy. (Lincoln’s White House secretaries were John G. Nicolay and John Hay.)

The more important point is that since Presidents are frequent recipients of assassination threats, they rarely make any public appearances without somebody’s warning them of potential danger. Only on the extemely rare occasions when a tragedy actually occurs do we later take note of the warnings; in all other cases the failed “prophecies” are quickly forgotten. (Lincoln received “an unusual number of letters about plots to kidnap or assassinate him,” said to have numbered at least eighty, yet none of those plots were enacted.) Nor does anyone think to mention other attempts at kidnap or assassination that were not preceded by any recorded warnings to the victims. (Lincoln was shot at on at least one other occasion.)

Yes, Lincoln was warned not to go to Ford’s Theatre by persons concerned for his safety, just as he had been warned not to visit Richmond a week earlier, and just as he had been warned not to attend his own inauguration in 1861. Obviously, only one of the myriad of warnings he received throughout his four years in office was on the mark. Likewise, Kennedy was warned not to visit San Antonio the day before his trip to Dallas (and undoubtedly before a host of other appearances as well), but only the last warning he allegedly received is considered significant, because it coincidentally happened to come true. As Jeane Dixon and other “psychics” have demonstrated, if you make enough predictions, one of them is eventually bound to come true; the public remembers only that and forgets about all the others failed predictions.

How would that be anywhere close to obstruction of justice?