Bahamut.Ravael said: »
By what criteria?
That is a question for you to answer. This isn't about Hillary, actually ideally the EC would vote another republican in who they believe is qualified.
Random Politics & Arguments Over Nothing #16
Random Politics & Arguments Over Nothing #16
That is a question for you to answer. This isn't about Hillary, actually ideally the EC would vote another republican in who they believe is qualified.
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
Can I be president of the united states?!
Nope, three strikes against you.
- Foreigner
- Girl
- Can probably locate Crimea on a map
[+]
I'm *** awesome at geography
[+]
[+]
I mean non of you find the emergence of this story coinciding with the end of recount mania the LEAST bit suspicious?
eliroo said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
By what criteria?
That is a question for you to answer. This isn't about Hillary, actually ideally the EC would vote another republican in who they believe is qualified.
If I'm understanding this argument:
Statement: He's unqualified.
Clarifying Question: By what metric?
Deflection: That's for you to answer.
[+]
As a statistician can we get a bell graph of Flavins inability to back up what he posts? We will be expecting standard deviations, the mean and mode along with analysis to verify data correlation to the hypothesis.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
suspicious
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
I'm *** awesome at geography
Fine if you are so good at then:
A plane crashes on the border of the United States and Iraq, where do they bury the survivors?
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
eliroo said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
By what criteria?
That is a question for you to answer. This isn't about Hillary, actually ideally the EC would vote another republican in who they believe is qualified.
If I'm understanding this argument:
Statement: He's unqualified.
Clarifying Question: By what metric?
Deflection: That's for you to answer.
He asked if you think he's qualified. There's an insinuation that he does not, but never-the-less, he asked what you think.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
eliroo said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
By what criteria?
That is a question for you to answer. This isn't about Hillary, actually ideally the EC would vote another republican in who they believe is qualified.
If I'm understanding this argument:
Statement: He's unqualified.
Clarifying Question: By what metric?
Deflection: That's for you to answer.
It is supposed to be for the electoral to answer, yes.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
I mean non of you find the emergence of this story coinciding with the end of recount mania the LEAST bit suspicious?
"Emergence."
It's been talked about as an ongoing concern for months.
[+]
[+]
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
We will be expecting standard deviations
Come now.
Flavin is far, far superior to your standard deviations.
He's extra-devious.
[+]
You both are qualified to be president now.
Enjoy the rest of this discussion, kids.
If anyone needs me, I'll be watching a bunch of overpaid grown men play a game, drinking beer that costs far, far too much.
If anyone needs me, I'll be watching a bunch of overpaid grown men play a game, drinking beer that costs far, far too much.
I have about an hour before I get lost in FFXV
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
your opinion is that it's stupid... you also didn't have to word it in an insulting way... you could have shown why you disagreed with it and discussed but you just lob out insults and that's about it.. its fairly hypocritical to call someone out for something like that and the go off insulting someone else and such lol...
We're continuing the argument and discussing the details as we speak. You're still here trying to pick a fight with me, and since you can never back up anything you say, you're not worth my time. Good day.
Let's get back to bashing media/politicians/liberals/conservatives/donkeys/elephants/me and not make this personal.
I'll even throw in free coffee.
It's store brand and really cold... but still free.
I'll even throw in free coffee.
It's store brand and really cold... but still free.
Do you remember when obama came out a few weeks ago and said there was no reason to doubt the election results?
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
I mean non of you find the emergence of this story coinciding with the end of recount mania the LEAST bit suspicious?
Perception is usually a ***... even if you have an argument either way unless you can concretely prove your point you're not going to change anyone's mind... everyone sees things their own little way...
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Do you remember when obama came out a few weeks ago and said there was no reason to doubt the election results?
Yea... and? I just think he wants an investigative report on how Russia attempted to influence the election? I don't think he is questioning the results.
[+]
Asura.Dameshi said: »
Let's get back to bashing media/politicians/liberals/conservatives/donkeys/elephants/me and not make this personal.
I'll even throw in free coffee.
It's store brand and really cold... but still free.
I'll even throw in free coffee.
It's store brand and really cold... but still free.
What about bashing deposed regents of a kingdom named ni?
Also I like tea do you have any Earl Grey and creame?
Please note changing the title of the thread doesn't make it better !
[+]
[+]
Allah Snackbar !
YouTube Video Placeholder
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.