Random Politics & Religion #14

You'd think, by Nausi's logic, Florida and Arizona would be solid, solid blue. Like, just so blue.

That's because the young and stupid didn't want change. The path that the liberals/democrats were going, they wanted to make everything free*. Sander's entire platform was free stuff all around! Clinton's entire platform was to continue down the path we are currently going (otherwise known as the "Preserve Obama's legacy" platform). You honestly think that a low labor participation rate, anemic growth (and it's only anemic because interest rates and inflation is so low. If interest rates/inflation was acting like normal, there would be zero overall growth, more likely a prolonged recession for the past 8 years), and inflated government debt is good for a country, especially one as big as ours? Can you honestly say that, knowing your claim as being an economist, that this country has been doing good compared to other administrations, including all 8 years of Bush II?

Do you honestly think or even claim that this whole situation that Obama and his administration has lead us wouldn't have given us results shown otherwise? If you do, then you are one of those liberal "elites" who's heads are so up in the clouds, only knowing their own personal gains but ignoring the plight of anyone around them.

One theory was:
The young are usually less risk adverse.
As you get older you are more risk adverse.

However, this (and the theory you and others are throwing out) should be re-examined because both Brexit and Trump was a vote for change, a risk that is very difficult to estimate (especially in Brexit case).

In both of those elections older voters voted for risk.

Frankly, generalizing based on age is a very poor measurement.

You'd think, by Nausi's logic, Florida and Arizona would be solid, solid blue. Like, just so blue.

Twitter Bias

Someone posts they hate all white people, and *** everyone who voted Trump. It gets reported and is OK by Twitter.

Someone as a test posts the exact same message except changing out white for black, and Trump for Hillary and it gets deleted and the owner is banned.

generalizing based on age is a very poor measurement.

Ok people. We'll just wait for the il-legals to be kicked out and then we'll take another vote.

Ok people. We'll just wait for the il-legals to be kicked out and then we'll take another vote.

I have no idea where he got his.

The same place where he pulls all of his arguments from?

or we can do math.

REALITY

70 million - the number of democrats that voted for obama 08
+
5 million - the gain in democrats registered to vote since
______________

=75 Million - total dems polled to vote in 16
-
60 Million - Actually Voted for Hillary
______________
15 Million democrat voters that didn't vote at all


Imaginary

75 Million total dems polled to vote in 16
+
3 Million - imaignary voters that voted illegally
_______________

78 Million Votes -Nausi's Imaginary Voters that Voted for Hillary

You'd think, by Nausi's logic, Florida and Arizona would be solid, solid blue. Like, just so blue.

Those people aren't hidden democrats, they're people that only voted that way because it was Obama and not everyone that voted for obama was a democrat. Not everyone that voted trump was a republican.

This does nothing for your lies about voter fraud occurring by the millions.

Prove they're lies.

Prove they're lies.

You'd think, by Nausi's logic, Florida and Arizona would be solid, solid blue. Like, just so blue.

Not everyone that voted trump was a republican.

Nausi thinks that millions of bad hombres voted for Clinton to put her up in the popular vote yet somehow not the Electoral College.

They don't all vote.

yeah it's the worst conspiracy ever conspired...

All of your 3 million illegal alien voters didn't vote?

OK, that I can believe.

so what? almost the exact same number of people voted for trump and mittens.

statistically speaking everyone was a republican that voted last time

What about the never trumpers?