Ramyrez said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Ramyrez said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Welcome to American liberal politics and media, where if you shoot up a marine base in the name of Islam, we don't call you an Islamic terrorist. But if you watch the "Dukes of Hazard", you're most certainly a racist.
How does that make me specifically a victim?
I mean I'm just pointing out the double standard. Only victims point out double standards?
Honest question at face value: Did anyone -- here, at least -- say you're a racist for watchin' a couple of good ol' boys, never meanin' no harm?
I personally didn't see anyone (again, here) say it should be taken as far as it's gone.
Your dragging the rebel flag thing into this is a complete tangent.
All they're looking to do is confirm his motive one way or another. Was it wrong for people to speculate that the South Carolina shooting was race-related before it was confirmed? To a degree, yes. It was an easy conclusion to reach, but it was wrong to assume so before facts were out. Just like assuming this guy was a terrorist or had terrorist sympathies before the facts were out.
But it appears now he does, so. Feel free to say so.
Oh and honestly, no one said specifically because I was watching the dukes I was racist. I didn't say they were. I was pointing to the media climate which intimidated the networks to otherwise pull ANY show off the air that displayed it.
