Random Politics & Religion #00

Language: JP EN DE FR
2010-09-08
New Items
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Random Politics & Religion #00
Random Politics & Religion #00
First Page 2 3 ... 683 684 685 ... 1375 1376 1377
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-20 16:42:56
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
It's strange that other countries with mentally ill people don't have mass shootings several times a year if access to guns isn't a factor... Unless you want to live in an Orwellian police state just so you can own an unnecessary arsenal, gun laws need attention.
Quite the opposite really, hence why I would like to keep mine.

I'm not going to get into this discussion though, as it's entirely fruitless.

Just in your premise we don't agree, several times.

How would you propose to better identify and treat the mentally ill than massive surveillance, then?

I'll happily ignore the gun portion, I'm curious how you would deal with the mental illness and violent behavior.

You mean to identify, or what to do with those who are already identified? As they're two very separate yet both large issues.
Both ideally. Identifying them is hard enough, try subverting their rights based on what they "might" do. Or taking their right to possess weapons of they haven't committed a crime. You can address access to weapons a lot of ways.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-20 16:45:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Laconic said: »
Your kidding yourself if you think any fire arm will depreciate in value for one. For two, Hypocrite.

/Drops mic.

No, but they are generally a very poor investment over almost anything else that could be considered an investment. So the idea of collecting weapons that aren't historic or rare for that purpose is disingenuous.
Offline
Posts: 42671
By Jetackuu 2015-06-20 16:47:09
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Both ideally. Identifying them is hard enough, try subverting their rights based on what they "might" do. Or taking their right to possess weapons of they haven't committed a crime. You can address access to weapons a lot of ways.
None that are really constitutional.

I'm fine with denying anyone who has a history of mental illness from purchasing a firearm, as long as it's subject to due process.

But identifying those without a history is impossible. There will always be those who are trying to hurt others.

I don't see the point in talking about this though, we're not going to agree.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-20 16:53:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Both ideally. Identifying them is hard enough, try subverting their rights based on what they "might" do. Or taking their right to possess weapons of they haven't committed a crime. You can address access to weapons a lot of ways.
None that are really constitutional.

I'm fine with denying anyone who has a history of mental illness from purchasing a firearm, as long as it's subject to due process.

But identifying those without a history is impossible. There will always be those who are trying to hurt others.

I don't see the point in talking about this though, we're not going to agree.

Due process in what way? If they haven't committed a crime, how would you constitutionally limit their access? Even denying access to convicted felons is borderline unconstitutional.

I'm not expecting to agree, I'm not even trying to sway you. You are adamant that firearms must be available. I'm just curious how you propose to address the rates of gun violence without infringing on the 2nd Amendment.
Offline
Posts: 42671
By Jetackuu 2015-06-20 16:57:06
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Both ideally. Identifying them is hard enough, try subverting their rights based on what they "might" do. Or taking their right to possess weapons of they haven't committed a crime. You can address access to weapons a lot of ways.
None that are really constitutional.

I'm fine with denying anyone who has a history of mental illness from purchasing a firearm, as long as it's subject to due process.

But identifying those without a history is impossible. There will always be those who are trying to hurt others.

I don't see the point in talking about this though, we're not going to agree.

Due process in what way? If they haven't committed a crime, how would you constitutionally limit their access? Even denying access to convicted felons is borderline unconstitutional.

I'm not expecting to agree, I'm not even trying to sway you. You are adamant that firearms must be available. I'm just curious how you propose to address the rates of gun violence without infringing on the 2nd Amendment.

Start with addressing the poverty issues of the inner cities, and remove restrictions for legal firearm ownership.

But I care more about the overall violence rate, than just the "gun violence" rate. Quite frankly gun violence is the least of my concerns, even political ones.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-20 17:01:10
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Both ideally. Identifying them is hard enough, try subverting their rights based on what they "might" do. Or taking their right to possess weapons of they haven't committed a crime. You can address access to weapons a lot of ways.
None that are really constitutional.

I'm fine with denying anyone who has a history of mental illness from purchasing a firearm, as long as it's subject to due process.

But identifying those without a history is impossible. There will always be those who are trying to hurt others.

I don't see the point in talking about this though, we're not going to agree.

Due process in what way? If they haven't committed a crime, how would you constitutionally limit their access? Even denying access to convicted felons is borderline unconstitutional.

I'm not expecting to agree, I'm not even trying to sway you. You are adamant that firearms must be available. I'm just curious how you propose to address the rates of gun violence without infringing on the 2nd Amendment.

Start with addressing the poverty issues of the inner cities, and remove restrictions for legal firearm ownership.

But I care more about the overall violence rate, than just the "gun violence" rate. Quite frankly gun violence is the least of my concerns, even political ones.

You believe that gun violence is just a symptom of a larger problem, and will mostly solve itself if the root is addressed? That's a fairly reasonable stance.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-20 17:38:33
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Maybe people need to accept that humans are violent by nature. And no gun or law is going to stop anyone.
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-06-20 18:47:05
Link | Quote | Reply
 
fonewear said: »
Cerberus.Laconic said: »
umm.. wasn't this guy and the sandy hook guy already on mental illness drugs?

Odin.Jassik said: »
unnecessary arsenal

Hahaha.

Adam Lanza has Assbergers I believe. I think we should ban that !

He was obsessed with video games too can we ban those ?


There's a great YouTube video that's almost 3 hours long on this. If you're ever really bored, you should check it out.

YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-20 19:15:50
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Going to have to kill more black people to get tougher guns laws there I said it !

Wait I mean racism laws. We need more racism laws. It's 2015 lets ban racism.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-06-20 19:28:02
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Unrelated.

Another Family Guy clip about Bruce Jenner I forgot about.

YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-06-20 19:49:37
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Related:

Quote:
A childhood friend of the Charleston shooting suspect says he must have only recently began to "hate black people" as there was no indication of his being racist while they grew up.

Caleb Brown, who identifies as half-black, said he went to elementary and middle school with Dylann Roof, the 21-year-old accused of killing nine people inside Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, on Wednesday. Brown, 20, said he last saw Roof, 21, about a year-and-a-half ago.

"How could you claim [to] hate people like that, kill all of these people [when] you were my friend back then?" Brown said he wanted to ask Roof. "This white supremacist, racist, 'black-people-have-to-go' kind of ideals weren't put into him when he was a kid. It wasn't something that was sitting and festering his whole life and then he just busted. It’s very recent that that came into his mind and that type of mindset. That’s the only way it could have been."
Charleston Shooting Suspect's Childhood Friend Details Their Upbringing

I'm still waiting for an official Prozac or SSRI link. So far the only thing that comes up is Roof was caught with Suboxone (methadone like drug for heroin addicts) in February.

Quote:
As America comes to terms with a monstrous shooting in Charleston that has left nine churchgoers dead, bewildered members of the public are seeking rationality in apparently wanton and inscrutable crimes.

We may never know quite what drives some people to kill. But it seems that in young Dylann Storm Roof, we have further evidence of a trend that should worry us all. I’m talking about his dependence on prescription drugs: suboxone, to be precise.

Roof is just the latest in a long line of young men who have committed appalling crimes after a lifetime on psychotropic drugs. If you don’t believe me, consider some of the most notorious young male shooters in American history.

Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza? Lexapro and Celexa. Red-headed Aurora killer James Holmes? Clonazepam and sertraline. Virginia Tech mass murderer Seung-Hui Cho? Prozac. Charles Whitman, the “Texas Tower Sniper”? Dexedrine. Columbine executioners Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold? Zoloft and Luvox.

You get the idea. These young men were all on prescribed medication. Feminism helped to get them there. In particular, female teachers who either dislike men or are completely ignorant of healthy behaviour norms for boys are creating a generation of emotionally stunted, drugged up young men.

Millions of young American men are prescribed powerful drugs after being diagnosed with the phantom condition “ADHD,” better known as a mixture of natural boisterousness and poor parental discipline. The mere fact of being male has become pathologised.

When they get into their teens and early twenties, they graduate onto drugs like Zoloft and Prozac, drugs that can produce a powerfully dissociative effect in the mind, muddying the distinctions between reality and fantasy. All this, because boys are now treated as though they are defective girls.

I once clumsily wrote that video games helped to “shape the fantasies” of Isla Vista gunman Elliot Rodgers. I intended not to incriminate video games in his spiral into madness and murder but rather to point out that young men who lose grip on the real world often retreat into imaginary ones, which can then have a stylistic effect, if you like, on their crimes.

After a year of reading the research on what America is doing to its men, and interviewing hundreds of young men in preparation for my book on the GamerGate controversy, I have come to believe that in most cases it’s not games, or movies, or “misogyny,” or “racism” that drives young men to kill. It is the increasing sense of isolation and disorientation young boys feel in a world that now feels architected against them.

Dylann Roof’s actions are unlikely to have been primarily motivated by race, even though he may have identified as a white supremacist. For one thing, half his Facebook friends were black. Similarly, Elliot Rodgers wasn’t a misogynist in any meaningful sense of the word. What these terrible crimes express more clearly is a crisis in masculinity – a crisis brought about by the way we treat boys in schools.

Men, in particular introverts, and especially highly intelligent introverts who sit near the top of the autistic spectrum, are routinely ridiculed in society, cast out as “manbabies” and “privileged oppressors.” The lived experience of such men is precisely the opposite of privilege: they are punished for being boys at school, branded “creeps” or, worse, rapists for showing sexual interest at college, and after all that – assuming they even graduate – they are discriminated against in job applications.

If “Dylann” “Storm” “Roof” deserves ridicule for anything, it’s his ridiculous name and that 1990s lesbian pudding-bowl haircut, not the fact that he is a man struggling to find his place in an increasingly feminised culture. What was his mother thinking?

Namby-pamby culture in schools is partly to blame for the current crisis in manhood. Teachers, who are overwhelmingly female, freak out at boyish things like play-fighting, cops and robbers and even playing “finger guns.” At best, this is silly over-policing of natural male exuberance. At worst, it is holding boys to feminine standards of behaviour. It’s not hard to understand why some boys, after enduring this for a decade, finally snap in a tragic violent outburst.

By suppressing male behaviours in school and whacking boys on psychotropic medication, we create a perfect storm almost guaranteed to produce broken young men who want to lash out at a world they feel has hurt them. After all, the outlook for young men these days is desperately bleak, which explains why so many of them are giving up on relationships and even sex and retreating into pornography and video games. I call it the “sexodus.”

Medication like Paxil, which Donald Schell was taking when he killed himself and three other people, is society’s answer to its deep discomfort with traditional masculinity. Our authorities don’t know how to stop men behaving like men, so they drug boys into submission.(A jury ruled that the drug company that makes Paxil was partly responsible for Schell’s meltdown.) It is a sadistic and high-risk strategy. And it isn’t working.

Feminists like to bang on about “toxic masculinity” in wake of atrocities like Charleston. But it’s not masculinity that’s toxic: it’s the chemicals we’re pumping into our young men’s bloodstreams, frying their brains and turning them into washed-out addicts and dissociative lunatics who go out and murder anyone they can easily victimise, particularly girls. As ever, it’s women that feminism hurts the most.

And it’s going to get worse before it gets better – unless we stop drugging our young men and allow boys to be boys.
To Stop Mass Killers, We Have To Stop Drugging Our Young Boys
[+]
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-06-20 19:54:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
fonewear said: »
Maybe people need to accept that humans are violent by nature. And no gun or law is going to stop anyone.

Nuh uh. Guns give you a bad case of the murders. Just look at the "Who Shot Mr. Burns" episodes.
[+]
 Bahamut.Omael
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Omael
Posts: 400
By Bahamut.Omael 2015-06-20 20:04:48
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Nuh uh. Guns give you a bad case of the murders. Just look at the "Who Shot Mr. Burns" episodes.

And with just a few minor modifications, you can turn 5 guns into 1 gun. Perfect for home defense.

[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-20 20:05:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
fonewear said: »
Maybe people need to accept that humans are violent by nature. And no gun or law is going to stop anyone.

Nuh uh. Guns give you a bad case of the murders. Just look at the "Who Shot Mr. Burns" episodes.

Guns are bad mmkay. Don't do guns. Mmkay !
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-20 20:07:21
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Omael said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Nuh uh. Guns give you a bad case of the murders. Just look at the "Who Shot Mr. Burns" episodes.

And with just a few minor modifications, you can turn 5 guns into 1 gun. Perfect for home defense.


YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-20 20:08:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
"You couldn't be more wrong Lisa. If I didn't have this gun, the King of England could just walk in here any time he wants and start shoving you around. Do you want that?"
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-20 20:11:12
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I love them cheering him saying "I managed to shoot him in the spine"
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-20 20:30:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
We don't have a gun problem...we have a *** up people problem.
[+]
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-06-20 20:51:55
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Start with addressing the poverty issues of the inner cities, and remove restrictions for legal firearm ownership.
I'm confused by these points.

The mass killings of the past 20 years? They've mostly been committed by affluent white teenagers and 20-somethings. Many of them had obtained their armament legally, plenty of them were encouraged in their firearm hobby by their parents.

What possible effect would confronting inner city poverty have on mass shootings? If anything, the logical step from the data would be to lock up unstable, affluent males until they're about 30. Not that isolation and imprisonment have any positive effects, mind you, but America sure loves its prisons, so whatever.

And as regards legal ownership, for the most part, someone who wants a gun in the United States can get one. We have nearly as many firearms in the country as we have people, so legal and illegal are simply matters of how inconvenient and expensive it is to get a weapon. Getting a gun in the UK, where they've banned them so thoroughly even the police don't carry firearms, is moderately difficult.

If this is supposed to be some way to side-step the issue of mass shootings in favor of the more personal kind of gun violence, there's still no strong correlation between race/class/financial status and propensity to violence. At most, you could say that the poor are slightly more likely to threaten violence, but then it becomes like the problem of male and female suicide: women attempt more often, men succeed more often; just as poor people are more likely to fire warning shots and affluent people are more likely to just kill.

Chaosx's article does raise a valid point, though, that dovetails with another of yours: if we're to genuinely approach and deal with psychological illness, we have to stop pretending that being a boy is an illness. I'm not willing to go as far as saying that psychoactive drugs are gateways to killing, either mass or individual, but our entertainment glorifies masculinity while the society that shapes boys and young men vilifies it. It's not doing any favors for girls, either, unless being unhealthy, bitchy, and passive-aggressive are now the gold standard of sexiness (I'll bet someone will suggest women have always been that way, which shows how deep the problem runs because it was not always so, not even a generation or two ago).

If I had to point my finger at anything, I'd point at how everything is polarized now. In-group versus out-group is hard-coded into our DNA, but it's grown increasingly toxic and nasty in the past couple decades. The partisanship in Washington is symptomatic, as is the weird persistence of racism (seriously, we went from "gay plague (AIDS)" to the SCOTUS preparing to validate marriage equality in 30 years but we're still fighting to preserve Jim Crow?). Everything is growing more radicalized, one need look no further than how third-wave feminism has been hijacked by a vocal minority of gynarchists. It's weird, too, because Millennials are noted for saccharine inclusiveness, so clearly whatever the parents were teaching didn't filter down well to people currently coming of age.

So maybe it'll self-correct in another 10-20 years, but that's a long time to wait.
Offline
Posts: 42671
By Jetackuu 2015-06-20 20:55:01
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
What possible effect would confronting inner city poverty have on mass shootings?
When did I ever say that it would?

Shiva.Onorgul said: »
there's still no strong correlation between race/class/financial status and propensity to violence.

There's a very strong correlation to poverty and crime rate, and the last I checked, crimes lead to violence.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-20 21:05:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
There's a very strong correlation to poverty and crime rate, and the last I checked, crimes lead to violence.

That's a pretty bold statement based on the data. The honest way would be to say that there is a correlation between poverty and SOME crimes. Overall crime rates are hard to quantify. Do you go by violent crime? Misdemeanors or felonies? Total crimes committed or convictions?
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-06-20 21:11:55
Link | Quote | Reply
 
It's always nice to see that you never change.

Jetackuu said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
What possible effect would confronting inner city poverty have on mass shootings?
When did I ever say that it would?
That was the topic.

Jetackuu said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
there's still no strong correlation between race/class/financial status and propensity to violence.

There's a very strong correlation to poverty and crime rate, and the last I checked, crimes lead to violence.
You're relying on two layers of correlation to demonstrate a point. That's very shaky ground. Here's another correlation about crime rate: the more churches in a given radius, the more crime occurs in that radius. Only a pre-pubescent imagines that churches = crime from that data.

Crime is not violent crime is not gun violence. And criminality amongst the more affluent classes is both under-reported in the media and more frequently dismissed in the court system.

Not that poverty shouldn't be confronted. Or racism, because you're making an inherently racist assumption by tacking the words "inner city" in front of poverty. But when it comes to gun violence, that's red herring territory. It's completely irrelevant to the subject of mass shootings.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-20 21:17:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
But when it comes to gun violence, that's red herring territory. It's completely irrelevant to the subject of mass shootings.

Mass shootings definitely follow different patterns, are usually perpetrated by different people, and have different motivations, but they are still gun violence. And as far as I can see, they are generally included in gun violence statistics.
Offline
Posts: 42671
By Jetackuu 2015-06-20 21:25:39
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Or racism, because you're making an inherently racist assumption by tacking the words "inner city" in front of poverty.
No, I'm not.

Shiva.Onorgul said: »
It's always nice to see that you never change.
You too.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-06-20 22:28:36
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
if we're to genuinely approach and deal with psychological illness, we have to stop pretending that being a boy is an illness. I'm not willing to go as far as saying that psychoactive drugs are gateways to killing, either mass or individual, but our entertainment glorifies masculinity while the society that shapes boys and young men vilifies it. It's not doing any favors for girls, either, unless being unhealthy, bitchy, and passive-aggressive are now the gold standard of sexiness

This plus this (if you generalize it):

Shiva.Onorgul said: »
(seriously, we went from "gay plague (AIDS)" to the SCOTUS preparing to validate marriage equality in 30 years but we're still fighting to preserve Jim Crow?)

Basically points to a problem of too much change too soon.

Combine that with the 24hour news cycle, abundance of information readily accessible, and social media what you have is really everyone being able to know everything that goes on anywhere and share their opinions with anyone they want.

Humanity is approaching a singularity of sorts. There's not much that can be done, except sit back and let it happen and try to enjoy the show (and stay alive long enough to watch).

There is no solution, therefore is no problem. Only rapid change and the ability to witness the change all around you while being able to communicate with anyone.

Or a meteor strike could hit the Earth in September, which ever comes first. All options are on the table at this point.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-06-20 23:32:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Welp, 2 more mass shootings in one night.

Quote:
In two separate incidents, 11 people were shot in Detroit in a matter of hours Saturday, one fatally.

Ten people were shot at a block party on a basketball court at Webb and Dexter on the city's west side Saturday night. One of those victims died.

Police do not know the reason for the shooting, and are still investigating.

At least three of the victims who were shot were women, ages 30, 45, and 26.

Asst. Chief Steve Dolunt said it's a miracle no children were shot as many were present during the shooting.

As of 10 p.m. Saturday, police were not releasing the identity of the person who was killed

A 46-year-old man is also in critical condition and two other men, 21 and 26 years old, are in serious condition.

Dolunt said police do not know the reason for the shooting and thus far people at the party were not being cooperative with police seeking information.

He said there was no excuse for shooting when kids were present. There were little kids and strollers, he said. "It's a party," he said.

"I think one individual was the target the others just happened to be at this party," Dolunt said.

One person was detained for questioning, but no suspects are in custody, said Sgt. Cassandra Lewis, public information officer for the police department.

One person remained in critical condition late Saturday night; all other victims had non-life threatening injuries, she said.
11 people shot in Detroit on Saturday, 1 fatally

Quote:
Authorities say seven people were shot Saturday night in West Philadelphia.

This happened just before 10 p.m. on the 4100 block of Ogden Street in the Mantua section of the city.

Police say an 18-month-old baby, an 11-year-old, a 13-year-old and four others were shot during a block party.

The infant was shot in the neck and is in stable condition, according to police.

The 11 and 13-year-olds were taken to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the others — who range in age from 22-46 — were taken to Presbyterian Hospital. Authorities say all the conditions that are known are stable.

At least one shotgun was used by an unknown number of shooters, according to police.

The motive is unknown at this time as an investigation continues.
7 People — Including An Infant — Shot In West Philly

Looks like only 1 person killed, so there's that.
 Bahamut.Omael
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Omael
Posts: 400
By Bahamut.Omael 2015-06-21 00:33:53
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
7 People — Including An Infant — Shot In West Philly

Looks like only 1 person killed, so there's that.

You're movin' with your auntie and uncle in Bel Air.
[+]
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-21 00:40:21
Link | Quote | Reply
 
So all you people that think guns are the problem and we need to make more laws, confiscate, or down right get rid of them.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/at-least-two-killed-in-austria-after-man-drives-into-crowd-before-stabbing-passersby-in-graz-10333891.html
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-21 00:49:00
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Laconic said: »
So all you people that think guns are the problem and we need to make more laws, confiscate, or down right get rid of them.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/at-least-two-killed-in-austria-after-man-drives-into-crowd-before-stabbing-passersby-in-graz-10333891.html

My word, 3 dead in Australia since they outlawed guns 15 years ago. Yeah, there's plenty of ways to kill people if you want to. We've had more people killed in mass shootings in the last week than Australia has in a decade. Accessibility to guns definitely plays a part in that difference.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-06-21 00:52:07
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Cerberus.Laconic said: »
So all you people that think guns are the problem and we need to make more laws, confiscate, or down right get rid of them.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/at-least-two-killed-in-austria-after-man-drives-into-crowd-before-stabbing-passersby-in-graz-10333891.html

My word, 3 dead in Australia since they outlawed guns 15 years ago. Yeah, there's plenty of ways to kill people if you want to. We've had more people killed in mass shootings in the last week than Australia has in a decade. Accessibility to guns definitely plays a part in that difference.

You do know the difference between Austria and Australia, right?
[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 683 684 685 ... 1375 1376 1377
Log in to post.