Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #00
/sigh. Ramyrez, you're just "uncultured" for not "getting it". The way that one artist splatters paint on a canvas haphazardly and sells it for big bucks is totally different from the way you or I would do it. After looking at their work in a museum (and then checking the placard real quick to make sure it wasn't some random schlub who did it), you can really feel their inner turmoil expressed through the medium of paint-flinging.
Bahamut.Ravael said: » /sigh. Ramyrez, you're just "uncultured" for not "getting it". The way that one artist splatters paint on a canvas haphazardly and sells it for big bucks is totally different from the way you or I would do it. After looking at their work in a museum (and then checking the placard real quick to make sure it wasn't some random schlub who did it), you can really feel their inner turmoil expressed through the medium of paint-flinging. Heh. Guess so. I even like Jackson Pollock's work. I just dislike art/music/etc. snobs. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ramyrez, you're just "uncultured" Also... *sniffs* You're right. I bathed today. I just smell vaguely of Old Spice. If you're growing cultures, take a bath. Siren.Mosin said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Do we know why that woman was hitting the black teenager and shouting racial slurs at her? I mean is it at all possible that she did so and isn't a racist? dude, getting lambasted by the media is a far cry from being rounded up and thrown in death camps. I haven't had a chance to watch that video, & know next to nothing about this particular case, but even losing your job isn't exactly being tortured and murdered. let's keep a little perspective here. Ok what I meant by "1930's Jews" was the Jews in persecution, not the "tortured - bake em in the oven" Jews of the 1940s. The mass extermination part of the holocaust (the death camps part) didn't really start until 1939. You may wanna see a doctor about that knee-jerk. Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Regardless... she should be arrested for assualting a minor without even throwing race into this. Didn't we all at some time conclude that using a racial slur didn't have to make one racist? People say crazy ***when they feel threatened, it's not some window exposing their "secret racism". If a black guy had said it would he be just as racist? you realize that if you don't apply the same standard based on race, that's racism right? As far as hitting a minor, I can imagine many situations where striking someone under the age of 18 is justified. Like if I was at my friends pool party and someone little kid crashed it and started beating up on him, you better believe I would come to his aid if I felt the situation called for it. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Texas elementary school teacher says she almost wants to return to segregation and the 1950s She was fired after her Facebook post in the article. Yet another example of the politically incorrect as the new 1930s Jews. Offline
Posts: 35422
So you are telling me vagina egg plop is better than Van Gogh ?
Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Hey Vox magazine is apparently the central hub for PC-disgustingness. My favorite part: "You can think of the push to drop "guys" as political correctness run amok, or you can think of it as making a tiny change that doesn't cost you anything and will keep you from being a jerk to half the population — and help you make the world just a tiny bit more fair. " See if you drop "guys" as accepted lexicon, you can get some good feelz! Quote: Friends Folks Everyone Colleagues Gang Team Y'all Guys and girls Can't we just accept that when people use this particular form of vernacular (guys), it adopts a neutered context? As for gang being racist, the masters of PC, are the only ones allowed to prioritize the protected classes. Isn't "guys and girls" just as sexist? Guys and girls isn't exactly sexist, but it is a mouthful and an ineffective way to address an audience in public speaking. This whole thing is moot anyway, a good public speaker doesn't address the audience that way. Let people have their silly crusades against pronouns, languages are alive and evolving, sooner or later we'll have a more acceptable word. It is sexist in the same way "guys" is sexist. It otherwise assumes people identify as either a guy or a girl. What about those who don't? Offline
Posts: 35422
I don't get this art cause I'm not a hipster:
Offline
Posts: 35422
Ramyrez said: » Siren.Mosin said: » Ramyrez said: » What do we call me? an indignant little puke!!! (not you, the subject of your article) While I personally enjoy that my asthetic has become somewhat more fashionable as of late, I had it before and I'll be keeping it well after. It was never entirely compatable with hipsters anyhow. That and I hate Apple, the love of which is like, a key aspect of hipsters. I don't hate apple because of hipsters. I hate apple cause it is a closed system that makes you use everything they develop. fonewear said: » I don't hate apple because of hipsters. I hate apple cause it is a closed system that makes you use everything they develop. Oh, yeah. I don't hate Apple because of Hipsters either. I hate Apple because...I hate Apple. Most things about them, really. fonewear said: » So you are telling me vagina egg plop is better than Van Gogh ? No, I'm saying that there are undoubtedly great artists out there right now struggling just as Van Gogh did in his own lifetime and folks should explore and become patrons to today's artists rather than live exclusively in the past. Appreciate the greats of the past, by all means. Just realize there's good stuff out there now too. As for Georgia O'Queef, she's just playing a niche market. Offline
Posts: 35422
Now I need to watch a video of Georgia O Queef !
fonewear said: » Now I need to watch a video of Georgia O Queef ! C'mon. You have to admit. That was a *** great one. Offline
Posts: 35422
Sounds like something I would say !
You're all just mad you're not part of an incestuous art scene made up of rich kid offspring, drug addled idealists, arrogant snobs, pathetic losers, attention *** and defenders of the faith.
It's almost like the art scene mirrors the old XI endgame.... You had me at incestuous.
Offline
Posts: 35422
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » You're all just mad you're not part of an incestuous art scene made up of rich kid offspring, drug addled idealists, arrogant snobs, pathetic losers, attention *** and defenders of the faith. It's almost like the art scene mirrors the old XI endgame.... It's not an addiction till you enter FFXI rehab. You can cling to your guns and religion. I'll cling to my outdated MMO ! Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Didn't we all at some time conclude that using a racial slur didn't have to make one racist? People say crazy ***when they feel threatened, it's not some window exposing their "secret racism". If a black guy had said it would he be just as racist? you realize that if you don't apply the same standard based on race, that's racism right? As far as hitting a minor, I can imagine many situations where striking someone under the age of 18 is justified. Like if I was at my friends pool party and someone little kid crashed it and started beating up on him, you better believe I would come to his aid if I felt the situation called for it. If you feel the need to make up events just to try to justify yourself by all means... but as I said before why, even in the heat of the moment, do you even turn to racial slurs or insulting in any way based on race? There are plenty of ways I could cuss anyone out without going there. Would you do that if you were in the heat of the moment with another white person in the same situation? Would you insult them based on their race or do you just call them an *** or some other kind of insult that has nothing to do with race? If it were the black girl in this case insulting the white woman regarding her race then yes she would be racist. I always think it's funny when people try to defend that kind of behavior with a it's not equal argument lol.. Honestly... if you can't control a situation with multiple people to the point where you have to beat down a 14 y/o at your age then you're a bigger pussy than I thought. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Yet another example of the politically incorrect as the new 1930s Jews. Offline
Posts: 35422
!
Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Didn't we all at some time conclude that using a racial slur didn't have to make one racist? People say crazy ***when they feel threatened, it's not some window exposing their "secret racism". If a black guy had said it would he be just as racist? you realize that if you don't apply the same standard based on race, that's racism right? As far as hitting a minor, I can imagine many situations where striking someone under the age of 18 is justified. Like if I was at my friends pool party and someone little kid crashed it and started beating up on him, you better believe I would come to his aid if I felt the situation called for it. If you feel the need to make up events just to try to justify yourself by all means... but as I said before why, even in the heat of the moment, do you even turn to racial slurs or insulting in any way based on race? There are plenty of ways I could cuss anyone out without going there. Would you do that if you were in the heat of the moment with another white person in the same situation? Would you insult them based on their race or do you just call them an *** or some other kind of insult that has nothing to do with race? If it were the black girl in this case insulting the white woman regarding her race then yes she would be racist. I always think it's funny when people try to defend that kind of behavior with a it's not equal argument lol.. Honestly... if you can't control a situation with multiple people to the point where you have to beat down a 14 y/o at your age then you're a bigger pussy than I thought. Cue the Gwen Stefani song ! YouTube Video Placeholder I'll go ahead and say it if no one else will.
Gwen can make all the catchy, shitty music she wants. I don't care. She's always gonna be 1995-98'ish Gwen to me. And that's nothing but good. Gwen Stefani confirmed for racist.
Offline
Posts: 35422
Ramyrez said: » I'll go ahead and say it if no one else will. Gwen can make all the catchy, shitty music she wants. I don't care. She's always gonna be 1995-98'ish Gwen to me. And that's nothing but good. I do like No Doubt better but she is still good. Just not as good. Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » Gwen Stefani confirmed for racist. Come on. Get your ***together. It's clearly a Fiddler on the Roof cover, which makes her mockery of the original antisemitic, not racist. fonewear said: » I do like No Doubt better but she is still good. Just not as good. What if I said I wasn't really talking about the music, as much as I liked early No Doubt? Offline
Posts: 35422
I grew up on No Doubt and miss 90's music a lot. So I feel it on another level !
Ramyrez said: » I'll go ahead and say it if no one else will. Gwen can make all the catchy, shitty music she wants. I don't care. She's always gonna be 1995-98'ish Gwen to me. And that's nothing but good. I know what you're thinking and I don't need your reasons don't sings this cause it hurts! rip No Doubt. Offline
Posts: 35422
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A proud Jew five words I've never heard before ! Next thing you know they are going to say Jews are cheap ! fonewear said: » I grew up on No Doubt and miss 90's music a lot. So I feel it on another level ! Again. I, too, fall into that demographic. But still not my point. Offline
Posts: 35422
Well damn just say it son ! I don't have time to interpret words !
|
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|