Random Politics & Religion #00

Not too well, he seems pretty dark to me..

You beat me to the joke *slow clap for you*

He cannot point to a specific point where he was attacked. Can you prove where I attacked him in that post? (It's on page 620 in case you are wondering, it's the post where it has Node 264 on it)

Good for you, now if Terra/Aelius can do the same thing.....

Not just say it, but actually do it...

Hey KN, if I can direct your attention back to RT, I have a response for you on the whole PM sharing thing you seem to be really interested in.

I already responded. I checked this thread first instead of that one.

P&R is always the first thread to check.

If there is a precedent, if there was an agreement, your simple quoting is enough to be considered an offense.

You keep trying analizing the situation as if its just 2 neutral posts, and the other misunderstood it. Thats not the case here. It isnt 2 posts from neutral people but between 2 persons in bad terms so that they had to call an agreement to finish this issue. You insist to ignore the context.

If i dislike someone, and if im smart enough, i would never keep trying open a conversation with him because bad terms are bad terms. Again normally its not a reason to bans, but the agreement changes the issue.

Well, i will just end my opinion in this talk with the ending of your post (incoming "harassment" excuse). It states you knew pretty well that you would be misunderstood. And even then you accepted the risk and made the post despite knowing the other would consider it an harassment. Thats enough reason, for me, to consider you, at least, hadnt your best intentions when posting.

The agreement is that I don't attack him again.

I would give you examples, but just mentioning it could be considered "harassment" in that poster's eyes.

But I was never told to not respond to him again. Just to not attack him.

I read back again...

I'm with KN on this to a certain degree.

Had Jet responded then KN replied with an antagonizing post, then I could see it.

But this post is taken out of context of the argument and put in place of some other context not at hand in the discussion.

Any feuds didn't really play a part, but it was inching towards it had it progressed.

http://www.ffxiah.com/forum/topic/43490/random-politics-religion/620#2908767

KingNobody, please take it here.

I already did.

Back to what makes P and R great:

Female viagra pills !

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/fda-panel-votes-approve-female-viagra-conditions-hearing/story?id=31530199

TLDR: Women are sexually frustrated...turns out men are the cause...probably !


An expert panel for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration voted today to approve a drug that has been dubbed the "female Viagra" after two previous attempts failed to gain approval.

The FDA is set to make a final decision in August, and while the agency generally follows to the panelists' vote, it is not bound to adhere to it.

Medical experts from the FDA examined the evidence on the effectiveness of the drug flibanserin, designed to help pre-menopausal women with Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD).

This is the third time the drug has been presented to the FDA, after previous attempts to get the drug approved failed in part due to the agency having concerns about whether its benefits outweighed the risks.

A mother and her daughter were among those to offer emotional testimony to the FDA panel today. The mother, Barbara, talked about how her relationships with her husband and family became strained because of her lack of a sex drive. She said she was diagnosed with HSDD and told the panel that she was "so relieved to know this was not my fault." She was on the clinical trial and said the results were dramatic, "no negative side effects, just good ones, really good ones."

Controversy Surrounds New 'Female Viagra'

The Fight to Get 'Female Viagra' on the Market

Girl Prompts Small Change to Organ Transplant Policy

But then she spoke about her daughter and her pain in knowing that she passed this condition down to Vikki. Then her daughter, with voice cracking, told the panel that "divorce is on the table." Despite her efforts to be sexual, "my husband thinks I don't love him anymore."

The drug works by manipulating chemicals in the brain to try and induce sexual desire and was originally designed as an antidepressant.

Early studies showed the drug helped women have more "satisfying sexual events," the FDA stated in a summary released before the meeting, but those who took the drug also faced multiple side effects, including nausea, dizziness, fatigue and fainting -- though very rare, according to proponents. During the early testing, the drug failed to show improvement in the key outcome of improving sexual desire. In addition, long-term effects from a drug taken every single day are a big unknown and one that may still give the FDA pause.

The drug is produced by the pharmaceutical company Sprout. Cindy Whitehead, the founder and COO of the Raleigh, North Carolina-based company, has been fighting to get the drug approved for four years.

"There are 25 approved drugs for some form of male sexual dysfunction, but still a great big zero for the most common form of FSD [female sexual dysfunction]," Whitehead said in an interview with ABC News last year. "No matter how or why we got here, we're here, and we've got to come up with a solution for it."

The drug targets an issue more complicated than the physiological issue that men with erectile dysfunction face, according to gynecologist Dr. Lauren Streicher.

HSDD "is a very specific problem in a woman who doesn't think about sex, she doesn't fantasize, she doesn't desire sex," Streicher told ABC News last year. "What makes it different is that it's distressing to her. This has a negative impact on her. She's worried about it, she's frustrated."

The complaints calling it "sexist!" to turn down that pill are ridiculous. If the pill doesn't work properly or has too many side effects it's not about sexism lol it's about your damn health.

There is a cheaper better form of female Viagra we call it alcohol ! Consult your local bartender for more info on possible side effects.

Alcohol might make you easy, not horny.

As a man there is no difference...

That's usually what happens when you emasculate a man.

Viagra, alcohol, horny, emasculate...

These aren't randomly political!?

Clinton-era politics.

She was only trying to help find his contacts that fell into his pants.

It's all apart of the Neo-Commie Feminazi agenda, yo.

I do have the impression that the introduction of the Viagra pill for women became more of a political debate rather than a medical one.

Only real news going on right now is Obama drinking Bavarian beer up in Germany. At least he's drinking some decent beer.

Here's something cool. My friend who was managing my property here before I finally arrived got to do some voice over work for UNICEF.

They finally released the video.



http://www.unicef.org/serbia/media_27663.html

He was in some movie (unrelated) they filmed in Budapest, Hungry but I don't think it comes out until November.

I had to laugh today as i saw an issue of the national examiner supposing that Obama is having an affair and Michelle sent her to Japan. Its pretty hilarious (For a rag).

In that case, this only came to be because woman wanted bigger wangs too. You know, equality for all or something of the sort.

It's pretty sad that in 2015, women are still expected to pretend they don't like sex.

Isn't that what the skimpy outfit is for?