|
Random Politics & Religion #00
Fenrir.Atheryn
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1665
By Fenrir.Atheryn 2015-02-19 08:49:13
Money should be taken out of elections. So, how else are people supposed to get informed opinions on the candidates again? By your opinion, they should go back to the old way where people are told who to vote for by interested individuals, instead of having the candidate's message go straight to the voter. Isn't that counterproductive to your argument?
They could always post classifieds on Craigslist.
By fonewear 2015-02-19 08:51:44
Last time I posted an ad on craiglist I ended up waking up in a dumpster !
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-02-19 08:54:36
Oh, obligatory:
THREE HUNDRED PAGES!!!!!
[+]
By Jetackuu 2015-02-19 08:55:09
YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-02-19 08:59:28
Oh, obligatory: THREE HUNDRED PAGES!!!!!
[+]
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:02:08
300 pages should we rehash global warming or feminism ?
ISIS doesn't seem to be an issue cause you know first world problems.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-02-19 09:03:55
300 pages should we rehash global warming or feminism ?
[+]
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:05:28
Hard hitting news from MSNBC:
TLDR
They actually use semantics just like us at P and R
Global warming bad
Climate change good
Can I go now ?
http://dailycaller.com/2015/02/17/bill-nye-tells-msnbc-to-say-climate-change-not-global-warming-when-its-cold-out/
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-02-19 09:05:30
Feminist warming thread? I'm intrigued.
[+]
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:08:17
Feminist warming thread? I'm intrigued.
I don't think feminist are capable of being "warm"
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-02-19 09:10:11
Feminist warming thread? I'm intrigued. I don't think feminist are capable of being "warm"
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:10:53
Upon further inspection these are loafers !
Up and atom !
Up and add them !
Up and atom !
Up and add them!
*sigh*
Better
VIP
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-02-19 09:14:02
Money should be taken out of elections. So, how else are people supposed to get informed opinions on the candidates again? By your opinion, they should go back to the old way where people are told who to vote for by interested individuals, instead of having the candidate's message go straight to the voter. Isn't that counterproductive to your argument?
They could always post classifieds on Craigslist.
A lot of countries require TV channels to use some of their advertising time for political candidates. It could easily fall under the current time required for PSA's. Public financing of campaigns is also not a bad idea, everyone get's a certain amount of advertising time free, a certain amount of cash for expenses and minimal travel as long as they can get enough signatures to run and maintain a high enough percentage in primaries. You could remove private donations entirely from campaign finance and put everyone on an equal standing. Candidates would no longer have to pander to rich donors, could no longer simply out-spend the competition, and would be rewarded for finding inexpensive ways to reach a large audience.
[+]
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:15:23
Remember Obama they aren't terrorists they are disgruntled postal workers.
Bismarck.Leneth
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
By Bismarck.Leneth 2015-02-19 09:32:13
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:35:32
Obama is speaking listen and you too shall be healed !
[+]
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:36:44
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:50:04
Obama giving a long hippie speech. Basically saying "why can't we just get along"
By fonewear 2015-02-19 09:56:47
I found male birth control: On the left
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-02-19 10:14:28
Money should be taken out of elections. So, how else are people supposed to get informed opinions on the candidates again? By your opinion, they should go back to the old way where people are told who to vote for by interested individuals, instead of having the candidate's message go straight to the voter. Isn't that counterproductive to your argument?
They could always post classifieds on Craigslist.
A lot of countries require TV channels to use some of their advertising time for political candidates. It could easily fall under the current time required for PSA's. Public financing of campaigns is also not a bad idea, everyone get's a certain amount of advertising time free, a certain amount of cash for expenses and minimal travel as long as they can get enough signatures to run and maintain a high enough percentage in primaries. You could remove private donations entirely from campaign finance and put everyone on an equal standing. Candidates would no longer have to pander to rich donors, could no longer simply out-spend the competition, and would be rewarded for finding inexpensive ways to reach a large audience. The problem with that is, the money for the elections would come out of the General Fund of the federal government, since nobody (that I know of) actually donates to the Presidential Campaign Fund you find on page 1 of your 1040.
So, we either remove all ability for private donors to donate but have the federal government give the money to the candidates from the General Fund (and like every governmental agency, will not only be ineffective and inefficient, but also be highly susceptible to fraud) or we keep to the current system.
Pick your poison, it's still going to kill you regardless.
By fonewear 2015-02-19 10:21:20
Actually Lena doesn't look too bad with makeup her body just doesn't appeal to me.
VIP
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-02-19 11:08:24
Money should be taken out of elections. So, how else are people supposed to get informed opinions on the candidates again? By your opinion, they should go back to the old way where people are told who to vote for by interested individuals, instead of having the candidate's message go straight to the voter. Isn't that counterproductive to your argument?
They could always post classifieds on Craigslist.
A lot of countries require TV channels to use some of their advertising time for political candidates. It could easily fall under the current time required for PSA's. Public financing of campaigns is also not a bad idea, everyone get's a certain amount of advertising time free, a certain amount of cash for expenses and minimal travel as long as they can get enough signatures to run and maintain a high enough percentage in primaries. You could remove private donations entirely from campaign finance and put everyone on an equal standing. Candidates would no longer have to pander to rich donors, could no longer simply out-spend the competition, and would be rewarded for finding inexpensive ways to reach a large audience. The problem with that is, the money for the elections would come out of the General Fund of the federal government, since nobody (that I know of) actually donates to the Presidential Campaign Fund you find on page 1 of your 1040.
So, we either remove all ability for private donors to donate but have the federal government give the money to the candidates from the General Fund (and like every governmental agency, will not only be ineffective and inefficient, but also be highly susceptible to fraud) or we keep to the current system.
Pick your poison, it's still going to kill you regardless.
Getting private money out of politics is never a bad thing, individuals should not have the ability to simply buy an election. Let it come out of the general fund, a couple hundred million a year is peanuts compared to the nearly one trillion we spend on defense. If you need assurance, make it an oversight situation and allow non-profits to administrate the fund, and if you need a sacrificial lamb, I'd offer up the NEA for it and another billion in funding to NASA.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-02-19 11:13:54
Quote: Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani says he believes President Barack Obama does not love the United States — or the people in it.
“I do not believe, and I know this is a horrible thing to say, but I do not believe that the president loves America,” Giuliani said Wednesday during a private group dinner in Manhattan, Politico reports. “He doesn’t love you. And he doesn’t love me. He wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up through love of this country.”
The event was attended by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican, and “60 right-leaning business executives and conservative media types,” according to Politico.
The former mayor failed in his bid for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination. Walker is currently considering his own run for the White House.
“With all our flaws, we’re the most exceptional country in the world,” Giuliani said. “I’m looking for a presidential candidate who can express that, do that and carry it out.
“And if it’s you, Scott, I’ll endorse you,” he added. “And if it’s somebody else, I’ll support somebody else.”
Earlier this week, Walker lashed out at Obama while dismissing criticism that he dropped out of college.
“That’s the kind of elitist, government-knows-best, top-down approach we’ve had for years,” Walker told Fox News’ Megyn Kelly Tuesday. “We’ve had an Ivy-trained lawyer in the White House for six years who’s pretty good at reading off the TelePrompTer but has done a pretty lousy job leading this country.”
On “Fox & Friends” Thursday, Giuliani clarified his criticism of Obama but did not walk back his dinner comments.
“Well, first of all, I’m not questioning his patriotism. He’s a patriot, I’m sure,” Giuliani said. “What I’m saying is, in his rhetoric I very rarely hear the things that I used to hear Ronald Reagan say, the things that I used to hear Bill Clinton say about how much he loves America. ... I do hear him criticize America much more often than other American presidents. And when it’s not in the context of an overwhelming number of statements about the exceptionalism of America, it sounds like he’s more of a critic than he is a supporter.” Rudy Giuliani: President Obama doesn’t love America
By fonewear 2015-02-19 11:15:28
Obama doesn't love me but Hillary does !
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-02-19 11:19:51
individuals should not have the ability to simply buy an election Only people who make that excuse is when the guy you voted for lost and you have to justify why they lost.
Nobody bought an election in the United States, people just use that excuse to justify the fact that the better person for the job won that election (in most cases). If you have a problem with the candidate, you attack them at their viewpoints, not on how much they are worth.
Let it come out of the general fund, a couple hundred million a year is peanuts compared to the nearly one trillion we spend on defense. A) Do you think that the money we spend on the Defense budget is worthless? Do you think part of it is worthless? How much would you see is reasonable for the Defense Budget, and how would you get to that amount? Where would you take the money away from the Defense Budget and why do you think it is reasonable to do so?
B) Do you honestly think it's going to be just a couple hundred million a year? It's going to be a whole lot more per candidate and you are going to have more than 2 candidates to support. Last I checked there's a couple of hundred "potential" candidates. If we use the amounts that Romney and Obama used in 2014, that's about 1 billion dollars each. Now we are looking at $200 billion dollars from the General Fund. Or 1/5 of the Defense Budget.
How much of that money is going to be accountable? Fraud is going to run rampant in a public funded campaign fund system.....
So, no, I highly disagree with you that getting private money out of politics is a good thing.
[+]
Bahamut.Milamber
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-02-19 11:30:52
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/world/europe/after-attacks-denmark-hesitates-to-blame-islam.html
Spoilered for those who hit the paywall. Quote: COPENHAGEN — Arrested for stabbing a 19-year-old passenger on a commuter train in November 2013, Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein blamed his brutal, random and nearly fatal attack on the effects of hashish, telling a court last December that he had been gripped by wild fear and thought his victim wanted to hurt him.
Last weekend, just two weeks after his release from prison for the knife attack, Mr. Hussein went on another violent rampage, killing two strangers and wounding five police officers. But this time he was gripped not by drugs but by a fanatical strand of Islam whose mission, according to a message he posted on Facebook shortly before the attacks, “is to destroy you. We will come to you with slaughter and death.”
Attendees during closing remarks by President Obama on Wednesday at the “Countering Violent Extremism” meeting.Faulted for Avoiding ‘Islamic’ Labels to Describe Terrorism, White House Cites a Strategic LogicFEB. 18, 2015
President Obama urged worldwide cooperation at a summit meeting Wednesday on countering violent extremism.Obama Urges Global United Front Against Extremist Groups Like ISISFEB. 18, 2015
Islam Yaken at a gym in Cairo, left, and as a fighter with the Islamic State extremist group in Syria, where he has been since 2013.From a Private School in Cairo to ISIS Killing Fields in Syria (With Video)FEB. 18, 2015
A memorial service for a man killed at a cafe and another outside a synagogue drew a crowd in Copenhagen on Monday night.Anger of Suspect in Danish Killings Is Seen as Only Loosely Tied to IslamFEB. 16, 2015
Terror Attacks by a Native Son Rock DenmarkFEB. 15, 2015
Gunman Believed to Be Behind 2 Copenhagen Attacks Is Fatally Shot, Police Say FEB. 14, 2015
The Paris newsroom of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, after two brothers walked in with military precision and killed 12 people in the name of Allah.Chérif and Saïd Kouachi’s Path to Paris Attack at Charlie HebdoJAN. 17, 2015
Mr. Hussein’s journey from drug-addled street thug to self-proclaimed jihadist declaring loyalty to the Islamic State terrorist group has stirred soul-searching in liberal-minded Denmark over whether Islam in fact was really a prime motivator for his violence, or merely served as a justifying cover for violent criminality.
“This is a very difficult question to answer,” said Manu Sareen, the minister for integration and social affairs, who shortly before the attacks launched a program to combat radicalization through outreach to parents, schools and other efforts.
That same question squarely confronts other European countries and the United States. As President Obama holds a summit meeting on ways to combat the lure of jihad in Western nations, he has come under criticism for his cautious language distancing violent extremism from Islam.
The link between the two has become a wellspring of debate in Europe, as societies grapple with the same messy knot of motives and influences following recent attacks in Denmark and France and a thwarted plot in Belgium. All involved angry, alienated young Muslims.
Often the attackers invoke Islam. But just as often, well before they had found religion, the professed jihadists built up long track records as violent criminals. Though many have become radicalized in prisons, they often seem determined to find an outlet for their violence one way or another.
One of a trio of gunmen responsible for the killing spree that terrorized Paris in January, Amedy Coulibaly, similarly fit the bill, chalking up at least six arrests — five for robbery and one for drugs — even before his embrace of anti-Semitism and Islamic extremism led him to storm a kosher supermarket near the Porte de Vincennes and kill four people.
“This is classic trajectory into jihadist terrorism in Europe. There is not a single pathway, but this one is very worrying,” said Thomas Hegghammer, an expert on jihadist movements at the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment. “They are misfits who find a solution to their problems in radical Islam.”
In embracing violence in the name of Islam, Mr. Hussein, a former member of a Copenhagen criminal gang called the Brothas, “substituted one subculture for another,” Mr. Hegghammer said, adding, “The easier it is for someone to plug into this radical Islamic subculture the more radicalized misfits you are going to have.”
“At the moment it is very easy,” he said, referring to a plethora of extremist websites and underground preachers.
Announcing new measures on Thursday to fight against terrorism, including extra funding for intelligences services, Danish officials did not mention religion while vowing to defend what Mette Frederiksen, the justice minister, described as “one of the most generous societies there are.”
"We take care of each other, and if you are in need of help, the welfare state will step in,” she said. Denmark, she added, does “not have room for those who wish to tear this down.”
Danish Islamic organizations, including the mosque that rallied hostility to Denmark across the Muslim world over the 2005 publication of 12 cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad by the newspaper Jyllands-Posten, have condemned Mr. Hussein’s weekend attacks on a Copenhagen cafe during a discussion attended by a Swedish cartoonist and on a synagogue in the center of the city. But they have also all insisted that Islam played no role in the violence, blaming it on a mutant misreading of the faith.
Junaid Mann, a former Copenhagen gang member who went to the same boxing club as Mr. Hussein, said he did not know the gunman well but had crossed paths with him at the gym. “He was a criminal who went nuts,” he said, adding, “I don’t think this attack had anything to do with Islam.”
Mr. Mann, who is now studying law and works part time as a counselor to troubled Muslim youths, said Denmark and other European countries needed to defend, not stigmatize, Islam as only this can combat “street Islam,” a toxic jumble of half-digested lines from the Quran and political passions plucked from the Internet.
Olivier Roy, a leading French expert on Islam, has taken a similar line, telling Information, a Danish newspaper, that Denmark should counter wild strains of Islam imported from the Middle East by building up a “national version of Islam” through state funding for mosques and preachers, just as it funds Denmark’s state church.
But Mr. Sareen, the minister responsible for integration, said such an approach would do nothing to “prevent scenes like we saw at the weekend” because young people do not get radicalized in mosques but in jail or sitting at home watching YouTube videos posted by the Islamic State or other militant groups. “The state could finance dozens of mosques but you would still see people getting radicalized,” he said.
The trigger for extremist violence, added Mr. Sareen, a self-declared atheist and former social worker, is rarely the result of a single cause. “You have a part that is social, part that is psychiatric, part that is brainwashing and part that comes from messages in the mosque or from radical preachers.”
Mehdi Mozzaffari, an Iranian-born Danish political science professor, complained that mainstream Muslims and Western governments often downplay the powerful and poisonous pull of Islamist ideology, which mixes piety and politics.
“It is very evident that this ideology is playing a major role,” he said. “Without it we are facing just hooligans. But these people have an ideology that is very strong. It justifies their behavior and identifies their enemy.”
Testimony at Mr. Hussein’s trial last December by the defendant and others made no reference to religion, indicating that he underwent a rapid jihadist conversion in jail. He received a two-year sentence but was released less than three months after the verdict because he had an appeal pending and had already spent more than a year in pretrial detention.
A court psychiatrist, Katarina Adamikova, reported “no signs of severe mental illness except for a suspected hash abuse.” Mr. Hussein, according to court documents, presented himself as a “positive, open and social person, easy to get in touch with and calm in temper.”
He said that he had been stabbed in the leg before the train attack and “felt a lot of anxiety and felt in danger of being assaulted.”
Such feelings of persecution provide fertile ground for a radical Islamist ideology that, according to Erhan Kilic, a Turkish-born lawyer in the northern city of Aarhus who counsels Danish jihadists who have returned from the war in Syria, promotes and exploits a narrative of victimhood. “They always look at their problems through the glasses of victims,” he said.
Muslims, he added, do have legitimate complaints like other groups but young radicals often know next to nothing about their faith and twist it to serve their own personal hang-ups and failings. His message to returnees from Syria, he added, is simple: “A Muslim cannot be a terrorist and a terrorist cannot be a Muslim.”
That so many young Muslims feel angry at and alienated from a country that offers their families some of the world’s most generous welfare benefits has left many Danes flummoxed and also angry. This in turn has helped fuel the rise of the Danish People’s Party, an anti-immigration group that regularly denounces Muslim misbehavior and, according to opinion polls, now stands neck-and-neck in popularity with the biggest mainstream parties.
“It is very, very obvious that these attacks were connected to religion,” Soren Espersen, deputy chairman of the Danish People’s Party, said in an interview. “There is no doubt this was religious terrorism,” he said, adding that Mr. Hussein had himself declared to be “acting in the name of Islam.”
A survey published Wednesday by Metroxpress, a newspaper, found that half of Danes surveyed want to restrict immigration and a quarter want to ensure that Muslims never account for more than 5 percent of the population. The government is barred by law from classifying residents by religion but a study by Aarhus University in 2013 found that Muslims represented around 4.2 percent of the population.
“To be a Muslim does not coincide with the definition of being Danish, whatever that entails, and the Muslims therefore feel that as long they hold on to their religion, they can never be accepted as a true Dane, and thus the feeling of alienation from society automatically emerges,” said Sandy Madar, the founder of Streetmanager, a private association that seeks to help young criminals and youths at risk of becoming criminals.
Criminals, Ms. Mader added, “in general are not very religious,” but Islam, or at least distorted versions of the faith, can, depending on the individual, be both “a catalyst for their anger and actions” and also “an excuse for their violent attitudes.”
The government, headed by the Social Democratic prime minister, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, has sought to avoid a public backlash against Muslims by insisting that Islam and Western values can coexist. “This is not a war between Islam and the West,” the prime minister declared immediately after the attacks.
As in many other European countries, however, Muslims in Denmark may coexist with their non-Muslim neighbors, but they often cling to the values and conspiracy-driven mind-set of their home countries.
Mr. Mann, the law student and youth counselor, for example, said he was convinced that the United States government had a hand in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. “You have to be blind” to think otherwise, he said.
Helime al-Amed, a Palestinian from Syria and mother of five children in Mjolnerparken, the housing project where Mr. Hussein grew up, praised Denmark as a generous and friendly country, but she still believes that last weekend’s attacks were “orchestrated by people who are against us, who want to provoke anger at Muslims.”
Mr. Hussein, she added, had been deliberately killed by police officers in a shootout Sunday morning to prevent him from talking. “When he died the truth died with him,” she said.
And at the same time:
http://www.justitsministeriet.dk/sites/default/files/media/Pressemeddelelser/pdf/2015/Et%20st%C3%A6rkt%20v%C3%A6rn%20mod%20terror.pdf
Quote:
12 nye tiltag mod terror
Bedre redskaber til politiets og Politiets Efterretningstjenestes indsats mod terror i Danmark
1. 200 mio.kr. til udbygning af politiets og PET’s beredskabs- og overvågningsindsats.
2. 150 mio. kr. til øget it- og analysekapacitet.
3. Udvidelse af livvagtsstyrken.
4. Adgang til relevante oplysninger om flypassagerer.
5. Undersøgelse af mulig registrering af brugere af taletidskort.
Bedre redskaber til Forsvarets Efterretningstjenestes indsats over for terror rettet mod Danmark
6. 415 mio. kr. til indhentning og analyse af oplysninger om terrortrusler fra udlandet.
7. Styrket indsats mod danske ekstremister i udlandet.
Styrkelse af beredskabet til indsats ved en terrorhændelse
8. Udvidelse af aktionsstyrken i PET.
9. Forstærket nationalt døgnberedskab under Rigspolitiet.
Forebygge radikalisering i fængslerne
10. Nye initiativer til forebyggelse af radikalisering i fængslerne.
Øget dansk bidrag til internationalt samarbejde om terrorbekæmpelse
11. Styrkelse af den forebyggende indsats i bl.a. Mellemøsten og Nordafrika.
Gennemgang af den danske terrorbekæmpelse
12. Et udvalg skal gennemgå den danske terrorbekæmpelse.
Regeringen vil målrette i alt 970 mio. kr. over de næste 4 år til de nye tiltag.
From google, since I'm lazy at the moment.
12 new measures against terrorism
Better tools for police and Police Intelligence efforts against terrorism in Denmark
1. 200 million kr. to build upon the police and PET emergency and monitoring efforts.
2. 150 million. kr. to increased IT and analytical capacity.
3. Expansion of bodyguard force.
4. Access to relevant information on airline passengers.
5. Investigation of possible registration of users of prepaid cards.
Better tools for the Defence Intelligence Service's response to terror directed against Denmark
6. 415 million. kr. to the collection and analysis of information on terrorist threats from abroad.
7. Strengthened efforts against Danish extremists abroad.
Strengthening preparedness to deal with a terrorist incident
8. Extension of action strength of PET.
9. Enhanced national day preparedness during National Police.
Preventing radicalization in prisons
10. New initiatives for preventing radicalization in prisons.
Increased Danish contribution to international cooperation on counter-terrorism
11. Strengthening the preventive initiatives include Middle East and North Africa.
Review of the Danish Terrorism
12. A committee will review the Danish counterterrorism.
The government will target a total of 970 million. kr. over the next four years for the new initiatives.
PET is Politiets Efterretningstjenestes, or the Danish Security and Intelligence Service.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-02-19 11:32:01
If you have a problem with the candidate, you attack them at their viewpoints, not on how much they are worth.
This. So much this. There were a lot of legitimate concerns with Romney, but attacking him because he was privately wealthy and successful was idiotic and has to be one of the stupidest reasons to not vote for somebody.
[+]
By fonewear 2015-02-19 11:33:52
If you have a problem with the candidate, you attack them at their viewpoints, not on how much they are worth.
This. So much this. There were a lot of legitimate concerns with Romney, but attacking him because he was privately wealthy and successful was idiotic and has to be one of the stupidest reasons to not vote for somebody.
Sorta like voting for Obama cause you are black !
[+]
Bahamut.Milamber
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-02-19 11:39:38
individuals should not have the ability to simply buy an election Only people who make that excuse is when the guy you voted for lost and you have to justify why they lost.
Nobody bought an election in the United States, people just use that excuse to justify the fact that the better person for the job won that election (in most cases). If you have a problem with the candidate, you attack them at their viewpoints, not on how much they are worth.
Let it come out of the general fund, a couple hundred million a year is peanuts compared to the nearly one trillion we spend on defense. A) Do you think that the money we spend on the Defense budget is worthless? Do you think part of it is worthless? How much would you see is reasonable for the Defense Budget, and how would you get to that amount? Where would you take the money away from the Defense Budget and why do you think it is reasonable to do so?
B) Do you honestly think it's going to be just a couple hundred million a year? It's going to be a whole lot more per candidate and you are going to have more than 2 candidates to support. Last I checked there's a couple of hundred "potential" candidates. If we use the amounts that Romney and Obama used in 2014, that's about 1 billion dollars each. Now we are looking at $200 billion dollars from the General Fund. Or 1/5 of the Defense Budget.
How much of that money is going to be accountable? Fraud is going to run rampant in a public funded campaign fund system.....
So, no, I highly disagree with you that getting private money out of politics is a good thing. It should be fairly straightforward to run an analysis for relative campaign funding against success rates, if the funding information for the campaigns is available.
Regarding funding/fraud, place your thresholds for participation, with progressive/tiered runoffs. If you need to
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-02-19 11:51:18
"Greece is smart, but not putting enough effort. Come back next semester."
[+]
Random Politics & Religion is for topics that aren't thread worthy on their own and do not have their own existing thread.
Rules and Guidelines
Forum Rules and P&R Section Guidelines still apply.
Satire is tolerated.
If your topic covers a story over 6 months old (Watergate, Benghazi, 2012 Election, etc.) post it here.
Discussions on racism, homophobia, transphobia, and the like are allowed, targeted insults based on these will not be tolerated.
Political debates get heated and are meant to be intense, if you take offense to being called or proven wrong, you don't belong here.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen; if you prove you can't handle the criticism you bring upon yourself in this thread, you may be removed from it. You are responsible for what you post.
Along those lines, heat is fine, but sustained, clearly personal hostility is not okay. The personal attack rules still apply. Attack positions, not posters. Failure to adhere to this will result in your removal from the thread.
This thread is NOT the Flame Core.
These rules are subject to change and modification where and when needed.
Random Politics & Religion may be mained or demained depending on the activity within at a Moderator's discretion.
With that out of the way, let the debates begin!
/bow
|
|