I have no tolerance for people who look for all kind of dumb excuses to not vaccinate.
I suggest agents hidden in schoolyard bushes armed with blowpipes.
Random Politics & Religion #00
Random Politics & Religion #00
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
I have no tolerance for people who look for all kind of dumb excuses to not vaccinate.
I suggest agents hidden in schoolyard bushes armed with blowpipes.
I suggest agents hidden in schoolyard bushes armed with blowpipes.
I already know liberals are intolerant self-righteous a-holes but thanks for the confirmation
[+]
Why should I tolerate people that threaten the well being of literally everyone else.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
Why should I tolerate people that threaten the well being of literally everyone else.
Make fun of them, bully them into submission, make their lives a living hell, that sort of thing.
Besides, we all know that humans are the most intolerable beings in the universe.
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
Why should I tolerate people that threaten the well being of literally everyone else.
You don't have to, you have the freedom to make that choice. What you can't to is choose to have no tolerance BUT at the same time claim to be the "tolerant one".
Does that make sense?
Oh and if you didn't get a flu shot one year, you threatened the well being of people in a similar manner.
[+]
Endangering public health exceeds the limitations of normal tolerance. There is no conflict no matter how much you feel like there is in order to remotely support your flailing argument.
[+]
And conservatives would rather endanger everyone around them unnecessarily because "Muh-freedom". I'd take an *** over someone like that any day.
[+]
And here I deluded myself thinking that without Lordgrim we would be fine at least on this topic.
Guess even the most obvious things need to be fought through..
Guess even the most obvious things need to be fought through..
[+]
Quote:
You're not going to let me endanger other people by not getting vaccinated?
YouTube Video Placeholder
There is actually anti-vax stuff going on still? I thought they all died of smallpox.
[+]
It's almost like the whole point of joining a society is to give up certain freedoms in order to live a better life, like not dying of preventable diseases constantly.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Endangering public health exceeds the limitations of normal tolerance. There is no conflict no matter how much you feel like there is in order to remotely support your flailing argument.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
who exactly are they hurting?
Asura.Failaras said: »
And conservatives would rather endanger everyone around them unnecessarily because "Muh-freedom". I'd take an *** over someone like that any day.
[+]
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Endangering public health exceeds the limitations of normal tolerance. There is no conflict no matter how much you feel like there is in order to remotely support your flailing argument.
It's not a failing argument, you're a bigger risk to the well being of the people (public health) around you if you don't get your flu shot than if you don't get your measles shot.
You're probably a bigger overall risk to the well being of people if you go into work one day when you don't feel well, instead of just staying home.
Anna Ruthven said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
who exactly are they hurting?
I think what we are talking about is the more serious diseases that are preventable by vaccine, like measles.
Blowpipes I tell you guys.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
who exactly are they hurting?
I think what we are talking about is the more serious diseases that are preventable by vaccine, like measles.
[+]
We should all line up and get the anti-Oklahoman shot. Prevents us from being Oklahoman.
Edit: and cooties too.
Edit: and cooties too.
[+]
It shouldn't be. However the thing I just quoted was Nausi calling forcing vaccinations a liberal idea.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Realistically, when you think about it, the anti-vax crowd is only a handful. With the exception of their children, by them not vaccinating themselves, who exactly are they hurting? Probably not even a hundred-thousandth of the population at large, including themselves.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
[+]
Asura.Failaras said: »
It shouldn't be. However the thing I just quoted was Nausi calling forcing vaccinations a liberal idea.
Rarely he has good points, but most of his posts are generally broad attacks against "the enemy"
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Asura.Failaras said: »
And conservatives would rather endanger everyone around them unnecessarily because "Muh-freedom". I'd take an *** over someone like that any day.
Yeah actually way more libs are on that train than us rednecks.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Realistically, when you think about it, the anti-vax crowd is only a handful. With the exception of their children, by them not vaccinating themselves, who exactly are they hurting? Probably not even a hundred-thousandth of the population at large, including themselves.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Realistically, when you think about it, the anti-vax crowd is only a handful. With the exception of their children, by them not vaccinating themselves, who exactly are they hurting? Probably not even a hundred-thousandth of the population at large, including themselves.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
I mean, that would explain why measles isn't an epidemic here in the US, even those who have immune disorders are less likely to get measles in the US than those outside the US.
[+]
Anna Ruthven said: »
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Realistically, when you think about it, the anti-vax crowd is only a handful. With the exception of their children, by them not vaccinating themselves, who exactly are they hurting? Probably not even a hundred-thousandth of the population at large, including themselves.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
[+]
Anna Ruthven said: »
This is why everyone without vaccinations should be executed. :)
Anna Ruthven said: »
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Realistically, when you think about it, the anti-vax crowd is only a handful. With the exception of their children, by them not vaccinating themselves, who exactly are they hurting? Probably not even a hundred-thousandth of the population at large, including themselves.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
If they choose to not get vaccines, they end up dying to the diseases they choose to not get vaccinated for. Chalk that up to Darwinism.
But, honestly, with the exception of their offspring, there is no danger to public health, especially since almost everyone is vaccinated against said diseases already.
Have random searches of people's vaccine records.
<Cop> Well sir, it looks like you are up to date on all your vaccines...wait, what's this? Your booster shot for tetanus has expired? CODE 420, I REPEAT, WE HAVE A CODE 420 HERE, OFFICER IS TAKING HEAVY FIRE *gunshots*
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.