Why?
There is literally zero comparison between invading a country and malnourished and dying people in the ghettos. I can't even fathom the levels of ignorance going through your head when you post these things.
Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #00
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No, you underestimate them. It's more progressive anti gun vomit. Would you rather take your 1 million man army and invade the a nation where 20% of the 300 million people (60 million) own guns, or would you rather invade the country where only 2% of that 300 million (6 million) own guns. Why? There is literally zero comparison between invading a country and malnourished and dying people in the ghettos. I can't even fathom the levels of ignorance going through your head when you post these things. Aeyela said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No, you underestimate them. It's more progressive anti gun vomit. Would you rather take your 1 million man army and invade the a nation where 20% of the 300 million people (60 million) own guns, or would you rather invade the country where only 2% of that 300 million (6 million) own guns. Why? There is literally zero comparison between invading a country and malnourished and dying people in the ghettos. I can't even fathom the levels of ignorance going through your head when you post these things. I forgot you need to be fully nourished and living in gated communities to fire a gun. Siren.Mosin said: » yep. explosives would be far more useful than small arms. Indeed. Try using a small firearm against a tank and see how it ends up. Whereas an explosive at the least may stop the tank in its tracks. Also, explosives were used to terrific effect on D.Day by the French Resistance to cut the Nazi supply and communication lines. Wouldn't have helped if they were guns instead. Maybe we should have a "Guns for TNT" day in America? Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ah, so you have no point. Thought so. I just posted a pretty relevant historical point and gave you a link so you could further your knowledge on it. It's pretty clear that if nobody has a point here it's you. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » No, you underestimate them. It's more progressive anti gun vomit. Would you rather take your 1 million man army and invade the a nation where 20% of the 300 million people (60 million) own guns, or would you rather invade the country where only 2% of that 300 million (6 million) own guns. Why? The difference would be measured in how long it would take, not whether it would be possible. Also, the USA is about 3.8 million square miles, that's 16 armed people per square mile by your figures. Far from an organized and effective resistance by any stretch of the imagination. Especially when the only means for organizing are in the hands of the government. The focus on Carson's statements are less about guns and more about a fundamental misunderstanding the role of small arms in world events. So many personal attacks.
So nobody else is going to talk about how Cali took a step away from fascism? No? K. Jetackuu said: » So many personal attacks. It's not a personal attack to state a matter of fact. If people find it so offensive to be called out on their ignorance they should educate themselves. Aeyela said: » Maybe we should have a "Guns for TNT" day in America? I don't believe this country will ever be disarmed. I'd pick a different crusade. The root of the problem is lack of parental guidance, lack of education, & poverty. those are issues we can make headway on, and would cause the cessation of gun violence. Siren.Mosin said: » I don't believe this country will ever be disarmed. I'd pick a different crusade. The root of the problem is lack of parental guidance, lack of education, & poverty. those are issues we can make headway on, and would cause the cessation of gun violence. Countries that have strict gun regulations still have a lack of parental guidance, education and poverty. But they don't have mass shootings all the time. Jetackuu said: » So many personal attacks. So nobody else is going to talk about how Cali took a step away from fascism? No? K. out here in herda hadda, 99.9% of the people if asked what the cops do with 'stingrays' would imagine something to do with fish. Jetackuu said: » So many personal attacks. So nobody else is going to talk about how Cali took a step away from fascism? No? K. I did! Aeyela said: » Countries that aren't this one. Siren.Mosin said: » Aeyela said: » Maybe we should have a "Guns for TNT" day in America? I don't believe this country will ever be disarmed. I'd pick a different crusade. The root of the problem is lack of parental guidance, lack of education, & poverty. those are issues we can make headway on, and would cause the cessation of gun violence. I wouldn't assert that it would fully cease any kind of violence, but it would cut down on violence (of all kinds) and crime in general. Education and finances are very large issues in this nation. Jetackuu said: » There's no need to. If I overstep a line I'm sure I will be informed. Anyone coming into this thread that displays a high level of ignorance on such atrocious historical events really need thicker skin. What's that got to do with anything? Every country I could cite has all the problems America has but none of them allow guns. You don't think there's possibly something about that that might be the reason they have next to no gun crime? Jassik said: » The difference would be measured in how long it would take, not whether it would be possible. When has that ever mattered in times of war, AMIRITE? Siren.Mosin said: » Jetackuu said: » So many personal attacks. So nobody else is going to talk about how Cali took a step away from fascism? No? K. out here in herda hadda, 99.9% of the people if asked what the cops do with 'stingrays' would imagine something to do with fish. So ha. Jetackuu said: » Siren.Mosin said: » Jetackuu said: » So many personal attacks. So nobody else is going to talk about how Cali took a step away from fascism? No? K. out here in herda hadda, 99.9% of the people if asked what the cops do with 'stingrays' would imagine something to do with fish. So ha. NPR did a little expose on them a few months back, but that's the first I'd ever heard of their existence. I mean, spoofing cellular towers isn't remotely new, there's a ton of trusted data sent for QoS type stuff, but the common police departments having them was a shock to me. Just the shear amount of junk data that gets swept up in an operation like that is textbook unlawful search and seizure. Since cell carriers own their technology and probably have some stake in the devices since they're subsidized, I can't believe that spoofing a tower doesn't fall into criminal territory. Aeyela said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No, I am not referring to the holocaust victims. In 1944 Warsaw rebelled against the Nazi conquerors and fought and gained large swathes of Warsaw before ultimately being defeated over sixty days later. The Nazis then razed Warsaw to the ground and completely obliterated the city. Not only that, but almost all personnel who took part were brutally and systematically executed after being promised safe surrender. It was the largest (by a long way) rebellion against the Axis during World War 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Uprising And a reconstruction of the aftermath using historical photographs and data: YouTube Video Placeholder Look how that rebellion in Syria is going, too. They look pretty well armed to me. It's just willful ignorance and baseless defense of "MUH GUNS" to say that a gun means freedom. You're not arguing against the effectiveness of an armed citizenry, you're making an argument for pacifism during occupation. "Don't resist, just do what they say and we'll be better off" Poland may have lost during the uprising, but they were capable of uprising BECAUSE THEY WERE ARMED. I can't wait to hear you backtrack the next time Palestine comes into the news cycle. I'm sure if anyone did it except the police they'd find themselves in a 8x10 with some hairy guy that they don't want to meet.
Aeyela said: » What's that got to do with anything? Every country I could cite has all the problems America has but none of them allow guns. then live in one of those utopias, & leave us alone! we like guns. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » You're not arguing against the effectiveness of an armed citizenry Of course I am. You're just choosing to ignore it. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » you're making an argument for pacifism during occupation. "Don't resist, just do what they say and we'll be better off" No, you're seeing what you want to see. At no point have I said or inferred anything of the sort. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Poland may have lost during the uprising, but they were capable of uprising BECAUSE THEY WERE ARMED. You have no idea why the Uprising failed because you evidently didn't bother reading the link. They were exceptionally well armed and stocked at the start of the Uprising, having fortified key parts of the city and built an arsenal of weaponry well in advance. The Uprising failed because the Soviets sat on the outskirts of Warsaw and watched their foes kill each other, then waltzed straight into the desolate city afterwards and claimed it for the Kremlin. It was nothing to do with their fire power, be it a glut or lack of. I would go through the other half dozen instances of failed but well armed rebellions in history that come to mind, but I believe that was the job of your history teacher years ago. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|