Meanwhile, At The Huffington Post:

Not all liberals are dirty some of them shower !

Oh, and 91k raised.

That you can't see they're related is just another part of the problem.

It's okay. You've got plenty of company, I'm sure you'll do just fine anyhow.

They aren't bound to live by anyone elses standards but their own. There's no book of government "approved" religious beliefs.

A rare triple entendre !

Gay people that are Christian...my mind is blown !

While I will admit some people do take it too far but fighting against an unjust action is not using hate as a weapon against it.

This country is not made only for the religious and should not be governed as such. It does not infringe upon a persons personal beleifs. I don't get how serving at a wedding is any different than serving them in general either. Do you draw the line when you see a gay married couple walk into your establishment? The whole thing seems ridiculous anyways.

I'm sure that if there was a gofundme page asking for legal fees to sue that pizza place for discrimination, you would fund it because you hate straight people who wants to stick it against poor, innocent gay people.

See how that works?

Not making that argument, but trying to show the hypocrisy you are portraying.

So it's just bigotry then? You pick and choose the religious laws you wish to follow? Which ones are too sinful and which ones aren't?

If that is the case wouldn't that kinda make the whole religious argument moot?

Determining what is just and unjust is subjective.

Clearly we need a gay only pizza shop.

So using death threats is perfectly acceptable as long as the cause is just? Shitting on this family in fact such a cause?

The only way this works is that everyone has a right to refuse service per if it violates their beliefs.

This has been one of my biggest gripes with religion for years, one shared by several very religious people I know. You don't get to claim to follow Jesus, but only certain parts of what he said because this group of people is icky to you.

&


So...segregation is/was okay?

Segregation only works in determining what part of town you live in !

Whites on this side of the street. Blacks over there somewhere. We have strict guidelines about where races can live.

Segregation isn't ok because segregation was "government" instituted racism.

Hate straight people that want to stick it to poor innocent gay people? lol...

That's not how it works in any case and that's a silly example. There are no grounds for a discrimination suit at this point anyways.

I don't get why you guys have a problem with this anyways. If a company came out and said it was pro abortion and then people who were anti-abortion came out and said they no longer wish to support this business publicly or posted on Yelp would you have an issue with it?

Personally I don't really care whether or nto people refuse service and the outcome of that is on them. Public opinion is preety powerful and if I choose not to frequent an establishment because of their business practices then I don't see a problem with that either or making other people aware of why I don't.

The bigger issue though is the slippery slope that this could lead to. Can a power company refuse to provide electricity because they don't support a certain lifestyle? Can a grocery store? Can anyone for whatever reason and just cite religion?

Gay electricity make it happen ! While we are at it let's apply sexuality to everything we do. Walking talking etc.

Did you not read my post? Or are you like politicians who like to ignore the whole to focus on the most outrageous action and then double down on that?

No death threats are not ok. According to you though they should be as long as there are no actions taken. I mean wasn't it you yesterday that was talking about how all speech is protected? You can spew hateful speech but appearantly if its against your cause then you like to play the victim lol... Talk about hypocrisy.

With schools, sure.

But it was also practiced on a private level in restaurants, etc.

I believe in the first amendment as long as it doesn't offend my sensibilities !

Once you infringe upon a feeling we need to make a law against it.

Not really. On a personal level for sure. On a national or state level it's less subjective. We may not all agree on everything but there is a collective understanding. That's why we elect representatives and create laws to be governed by.

Again you didn't comprehend anything I wrote, my point was I can call you names, I cannot incite violence or make threats. Everyone accepts these exceptions to "free speech".

Really ? I thought we elected representatives to make us feel !

Nope. If the business was shut down due to intimidation and threats sparked by a sensationalist, cherry-picking media, then I would be in full support of the company, though. I condemn such tactics when they're coming from my side of the fence too. It's a novel idea, you guys should try it sometime.

So in order to enjoy Starbucks I have to protest all the *** they do that is unrelated to coffee. I get it now !

I'm going to boycott them till they believe what I believe damn it !

You mean in like ethic clubs in schools and colleges?
Or perhaps even sexist businesses like "curves"?

So, it's perfectly ok when you create a hate-filled argument to fight "injustice" but when it is used against you, "that's not how it works" and "it's a silly example."

Sure, whatever bub.

Who said I have an issue with this? Notice I have been very quiet about the whole issue?

Thanks for lumping me in there bub.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrites as they are.