|
When I'm President, the things I'll Change.
Remora.Brain
Server: Remora
Game: FFXI
Posts: 602
By Remora.Brain 2014-02-09 11:22:16
Quote: You two are the ones missing the point: I'm talking about the science of motivation.
And you're missing my point: It doesn't f*cking matter.
If you know anything about physiology then you know bone density begins to decline after reaching its peak at around 25 in your average person. Having a higher bone density at a younger age leads to higher bone density in old age. You also know that increases and decreases to tendon and ligament strength take longer to build and to lose. You know that these are all desirable benefits from resistance training for any active individual, especially ones who participate in sports or any other vigorous activity.
Argument like "I was once an in shape dancer and now I'm fat, this will happpen to all the childrens" or "historians don't get forced into history class," or "I used to do a thousand sit-ups but now I do 50" aren't exactly convincing me of otherwise. Especially when you don't seem to know crap about weight training and you're comparing something you have to dedicate to memory to something that's an unconscious physiological response to outside stimulus.
All children will see a benefit temporary or not. Some will benefit more than others. Some will find new interests. The environment created is generally one where people are healthy and it boosts self-esteem.
Whats more, with an anecdotal example for you, being in good physical shape at some point in your life and then becoming a lard*ss makes it easier to get back into shape than if you'd been a lard*ss your whole life for one reason or another.
Quote: I mean, you're never going to be President nor accomplish all of this stuff, anyhow
That remains to be seen.
And I'm an American I has birth certificates that you can't see.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-02-09 11:43:26
Tell me all about the evils of pot. It's worked out amazingly in Colorado and it generating stupid amounts of money. The people that originally opposed it in Colorado and were preparing for anarchy are now talking about how well it worked out.
Don't gimme that bullsh*t about harming the public either when smoking has been legal for years and is actually worse for you. How many people die from pot every year? Not as many who die from smoking. Well, there may be "proof" that pot isn't harmful, but the same could have been said about tobacco back in the early 20th century.
Besides, influence of any substance is never a good thing.
And this is paving the way for the legalization of harder drugs, like heroin.
And don't give me that stupid "slippery slope fallacy" crap either. It's only a fallacy if it's against your argument This is stupid. A license requiring prostitutes to be screened regularly and disclosing potential STD threats to customers isn't spreading disease faster than anonymous streetwalkers barebacking johns in an alleyway. So, are you going to force prostitutes to get a screening after every transaction? Even if you do it once a week, that is still a lot of guys a *** can go through. All it takes is one and you have an area epidemic.
At no level of schooling has a child had any say in his core curriculum. How is adding weight room to the core curriculum any different? Sure, if we were talking about that. I was talking about Military changes. You do realize that people enlist, and not drafted anymore, right? By halving the military, you are cutting back on those who wish to serve for their country. That, my delusional friend, is what I'm talking about.
I don't know about you, but to me a loophole is an unintended event, not something that was planned on, like charitable deductions. Last in first out accounting is a loophole that needs closing.
So tell me how closing bullsh*t like that is a bad idea. LIFO is not a loophole. It is an inventory system that is acceptable by GAAP standards. It is also acceptable by tax standards.
Let me ask you this then, do you even know why businesses choose LIFO over FIFO?
Policing the world isn't our job, and if America kept their noses out of other people's sh*t for the most part there wouldn't be as many problems for us. We could have stayed out of almost every other country's affairs after WWII and done fine for ourselves. Our "enemies" are currently the equivalent of a bunch of goat herders with guns, a theocracy in the planet's asscrack, and the only Koreans who can't even grasp the intricacies of photoshop.
You are correct, policing the world isn't our job, but other nations expect us to do so. Let me ask you this, who would you rather have policing the world, America or Pakistan? America or China? America or North Korea? Because if America doesn't take up the role of world police, do you think that there wouldn't be another country filling that role? Do you think that the world would be in a safer state with some other country policing the world like America is doing?
Murder for Profit? How? You'd have to sign up yourself, pass a stringent and extended screening period, keep yourself in good shape, and reaffirm consent before the procedure.
And you expect that the black market for organs (which exist today anyway, you should look around you more often) won't suddenly expand if it becomes legal to sell organs? Who's to say that you would have to wait until the guy is dead, you could just kill him and sell his organs outright. Hospitals won't care, there is such a huge backlog of organs that they are even looking towards 3D printing to replace organs. Government won't care because it satisfies the hospitals' need of organs. Only people would care would be the families of the murdered. But I guess you didn't think that through, did you?
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-02-09 11:47:18
My face hurts cause it met the palm of my hand too many times.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-02-09 12:07:29
The environment created is generally one where people are healthy and it boosts self-esteem. The hell it is. That's not even true of people who willingly do what you claim, but to expect that of someone forced into it? Absurd.
Anyways, I've extensively made my point: you want to pursue a policy of failure. Awesome, you'll do fine in Washington.
Bahamut.Milamber
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2014-02-09 12:22:00
Besides, influence of any substance is never a good thing. Never a good thing? You can't think of any influence any substance can provide which is good?
You are correct, policing the world isn't our job, but other nations expect us to do so. No, other nations which speak out against the US, or work for their own interests (often against US business interests) are typically punished by sanctions/trade barriers, if not outright regime manipulation.
Let me ask you this, who would you rather have policing the world, America or Pakistan? How about neither?
Or neither?
Again, neither?
What about "non-scary" options?
USA or Canada?
USA or Sweden?
USA or Switzerland?
USA or South Korea?
USA or France?
Because if America doesn't take up the role of world police, do you think that there wouldn't be another country filling that role? Have there been any other nations which have taken up the role of world police, prior to the US?
Do you think that the world would be in a safer state with some other country policing the world like America is doing? Like the US is doing? No. Would the world be in safer state if the US didn't police in the manner that it is? Arguably yes, as a good portion of the current problems can be traced back to US and UK involvement.
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2014-02-09 12:47:28
Esperanto is pointless because it never picked up as universal language. You need to be president of the world for it to work, and even then I don't see the point, english works well enough in today's world. It makes me laugh when people try to come up with an universal language or go back to Esperanto.
This is 2014, not 1990, people understand way more English than they did before. My brother who is 9 already talks to me using the English he learns from Yu Gi Ho stuff.
English has become what Esperanto hoped to be, and the more time passes with Internet existing, the more it's true.
Fenrir.Schutz
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3122
By Fenrir.Schutz 2014-02-09 14:19:16
Quote: I mean, you're never going to be President nor accomplish all of this stuff, anyhow
That remains to be seen.
And I'm an American I has birth certificates that you can't see.
You do realise that when you decide to run, your opponents are going to slog through your internet history for any dirt they can. And soon enough there will be an advert "Remora.Brain once advocated the creation of the OAT Khanda--is this the sort of person you can trust as President of the United States?!?"
And stupidly impressionable voters like me will go "OMFG I made a @#$%@%ing Khanda--it's sitting in my MH on a mannequin...there's no way in @$@% I am voting for this guy!" ;_;
Maybe start judiciously deleting things now, while you can. ^_-
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-02-09 14:33:12
Never a good thing? You can't think of any influence any substance can provide which is good? Tell us all then, what illegal (or previously illegal) substance can do good when under the influence? Heck, give me something legal too while you are at it.
No, other nations which speak out against the US, or work for their own interests (often against US business interests) are typically punished by sanctions/trade barriers, if not outright regime manipulation. And other nations expects us to enforce those sanctions/trade barriers when it goes against the majority of the first world's influence/wishes.
Hi2uSyria. Although we are doing a piss poor job at that. But that's another topic.
What about "non-scary" options?
USA or Canada?
USA or Sweden?
USA or Switzerland?
USA or South Korea?
USA or France? Have there been any other nations which have taken up the role of world police, prior to the US? Great Britain was the only other nation that was the world police, and they got fired after WWII. Man, that was in history class too!
But let's go down your list then.
Canada doesn't have an army, the US is their army. Nobody in their right mind would invade Canada and not expect the US to come in, kick their ***, and then take pictures of their people naked while a soldier places their foot on top of them with a thumbs-up pose grinning like they made a touchdown.
Sweden, France and Switzerland doesn't have a viable army either. They are protected by the EU, and by extension, the USA.
South Korea is also protected by the USA army. Ever heard of the "Demilitarized zone?" It is what keeps North Korea from invading South Korea, because of the US Army AND Navy right next to their doors.
So basically, the US is the world police keeping idiots like Kim Jong Un from throwing nukes across the street and in their neighbors front yards.
Like the US is doing? No. Would the world be in safer state if the US didn't police in the manner that it is? Arguably yes, as a good portion of the current problems can be traced back to US and UK involvement. So, lets pretend that USA pulls all military from all countries. Think that Hussain of Pakistan is just not going to invade the Gaza strip and kill all of Israel? Think Kim Jong Un is going to sit back and let South Korea do it's thing? You think China isn't going to go to war with Japan? You think Russia isn't going to intervene in Syria? Because if you do, I have a piece of land that you would like to buy!
US presence has keep the world at peace since WWII (mostly) and we haven't become extinct due to nuclear war because of the threat of retribution. You may not like it, but that is the cold, hard truth.
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-02-09 14:36:39
Holy mother of poor history knowledge.
Also you really don't know marijuana is used for medical treatment as well?
By Jetackuu 2014-02-09 14:38:39
Let Israel fight it's own war, that's one stupid conflict we should have stayed out of.
South Korea would wipe North Korea off the face of the planet with their own forces now.
We signed a treaty with Japan for them to not have their military, we're obligated by international law to stay there and assist them.
China doesn't want a war with the US.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-02-09 14:40:52
Also you really don't know marijuana is used for medical treatment as well? I know that.
I also know that it is being abused badly too.
"Doctor, I have bad feelings, please give me some pot!" *slips a 20* Holy mother of poor history knowledge. Sure, and you have yet to prove otherwise....
VIP
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-02-09 14:46:07
Also you really don't know marijuana is used for medical treatment as well? I know that.
I also know that it is being abused badly too.
"Doctor, I have bad feelings, please give me some pot!" *slips a 20*
Because crooked physicians don't prescribe plenty of unneeded pharmaceuticals... Also, some people will exploit any system they have access to, let's ignore all the positive outcomes because some physicians are dirty.
Ragnarok.Hevans
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15273
By Ragnarok.Hevans 2014-02-09 14:46:40
1. Think that Hussain of Pakistan is just not going to invade the Gaza strip and kill all of Israel?
2. Think Kim Jong Un is going to sit back and let South Korea do it's thing?
3. You think China isn't going to go to war with Japan?
4. You think Russia isn't going to intervene in Syria? Because if you do, I have a piece of land that you would like to buy!
1. no, israel can defend itself just fine. it will nuke the ***out of any country that tries to start an actual war. their claiming to need protection from constant attacks is just justification for their constant state of emergency and extreme financial destruction of palestine.
2. no, north korea is on the reigns of china's teat. they wont do anything that will threaten china's ascension to world super powa number one. not only that, they couldn't do much in a war. they would be able to take out one-two south korean cities in an initial barrage and would be wiped out shortly after. south korea has a conscript army of over 500k with many more in reserves. north korean soldiers wouldn't fight and the ones that did would be underarmed.
the north can't even feed it's people during peace, you think they can have any sort of sustained engagement and feed their troops? lrn2lrn.
3. let's not forget japan has defeated china in many wars, and the only reason they don't have one of the strongest armies in the world is because of restrictions placed on them after wwII.
not only that, but china is winning the war of the economy. china going to war would only be good for the us.
4. no, because like most far soviet states in the past, it's just a madman put in power to control the local populace and pay tribute to mother russia. russia cares so little about it's captured territories. that's why they left afghanistan and the other stans. if it's not financially viable and has no military purpose, they dip and leave the area in chaos for the us to clean up and try to "win hearts and minds.".
in conclusion, you're stupid and lack a fundamental understanding of geopolitics.
By Jetackuu 2014-02-09 14:47:54
oh paragon of personal freedoms and less government regulation:
why should drugs be illegal?
Ragnarok.Hevans
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15273
By Ragnarok.Hevans 2014-02-09 14:48:16
"Doctor, I have bad feelings, please give me some pot!" *slips a 20*
yeah, i'm sure someone who spent a decade in money and school and then hundreds of thousands into a practice is going to risk losing all that so a stoner can slip them a 20.
[+]
By Tymoris 2014-02-09 14:50:44
Also you really don't know marijuana is used for medical treatment as well? I know that.
I also know that it is being abused badly too.
"Doctor, I have bad feelings, please give me some pot!" *slips a 20* Holy mother of poor history knowledge. Sure, and you have yet to prove otherwise....
Well it can't be worse than drowing their bad feelings in whisky or vodka. I mean vodka was used for medicinal purposes too hahaha
Ragnarok.Hevans
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15273
By Ragnarok.Hevans 2014-02-09 14:51:34
oh, and tell me the difference between someone being charged 200 or an insurance company being charged 3-500 for a doctor visit and xanax prescription?
you're paying the doctor a lot more than 20. you pay the doctor, no one is slipping the doctor cash. you or your insurance company pay that ***at the door.
Ragnarok.Hevans
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15273
By Ragnarok.Hevans 2014-02-09 14:54:55
also, canada has an army of 100k, granted 30k are reserves.
Bismarck.Magnuss
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 28615
By Bismarck.Magnuss 2014-02-09 14:55:34
Attack llamas would be cheaper. Just sayin'.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-02-09 14:57:15
True americans know canadians aren't manly enough to own an army!
Ragnarok.Hevans
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15273
By Ragnarok.Hevans 2014-02-09 14:59:28
well... it's the canadian unified forces. mainly the royal navy.
it's all very frilly. although they sent soldiers to iraq and afghanistan who died fighting our shitty wars. whether or not you believe in the causes of the wars, i think a true american shows gratitude for soldiers that fight for us.
Odin.Liela
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10191
By Odin.Liela 2014-02-09 15:08:21
I don't think our government is doing quite a bang-up job of things, but I also don't think I could do better. I don't have the education, the wisdom, or the experience to get in there and really make a difference, and the majority of my ideas are wild, naive wishes. So keeping that in mind, I guess the main thing I would want to change, if I could, would be to make it illegal to lie on the campaign trail or in news stories.
I think people should have all the education they need to make the decisions that are right for them, and when politicians and news stations tell lies, half-truths, and lies of omission, it's not only cheap and sleazy, but it also decreases the ability of the people to make an informed decision. And I think that hurts us all.
So. I don't think there is a single politician, not one, who is totally honest. I'd change that. If you get caught lying to the people as a politician, you don't get to be a politician anymore. And I don't think there's a single news company, not one, who is totally honest. I'd change that. If you get caught "embellishing" the news or leaving pertinent information out, you don't get to be a news station anymore.
Of course, that's completely ridiculous and everyone lies and it would be almost impossible to enforce and news stories break before all the information comes in, but that would be my end goal. Force the leaders and news casters of this country to give the people straight-forward and honest information so we can all make the informed decision that is right for us, whatever that decision may be. It'll never happen.
By Jetackuu 2014-02-09 15:30:10
well... it's the canadian unified forces. mainly the royal navy.
it's all very frilly. although they sent soldiers to iraq and afghanistan who died fighting our shitty wars. whether or not you believe in the causes of the wars, i think a true american shows gratitude for soldiers that fight for us. just because the soldiers think they're fighting for just causes doesn't mean they are.
Personally I have an issue with "supporting" people who enable war profiteering, but that's just me.
Ragnarok.Hevans
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15273
By Ragnarok.Hevans 2014-02-09 15:38:24
well... it's the canadian unified forces. mainly the royal navy.
it's all very frilly. although they sent soldiers to iraq and afghanistan who died fighting our shitty wars. whether or not you believe in the causes of the wars, i think a true american shows gratitude for soldiers that fight for us. just because the soldiers think they're fighting for just causes doesn't mean they are.
Personally I have an issue with "supporting" people who enable war profiteering, but that's just me.
qft. i specifically referred to them as shitty wars and only said we should be more supportive than completely mocking an army that supported ours in a war. no one is saying they were good wars or yay emperor bush.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-02-09 15:42:02
1. Think that Hussain of Pakistan is just not going to invade the Gaza strip and kill all of Israel?
2. Think Kim Jong Un is going to sit back and let South Korea do it's thing?
3. You think China isn't going to go to war with Japan?
4. You think Russia isn't going to intervene in Syria? Because if you do, I have a piece of land that you would like to buy!
1. no, israel can defend itself just fine. it will nuke the ***out of any country that tries to start an actual war. their claiming to need protection from constant attacks is just justification for their constant state of emergency and extreme financial destruction of palestine.
2. no, north korea is on the reigns of china's teat. they wont do anything that will threaten china's ascension to world super powa number one. not only that, they couldn't do much in a war. they would be able to take out one-two south korean cities in an initial barrage and would be wiped out shortly after. south korea has a conscript army of over 500k with many more in reserves. north korean soldiers wouldn't fight and the ones that did would be underarmed.
the north can't even feed it's people during peace, you think they can have any sort of sustained engagement and feed their troops? lrn2lrn.
3. let's not forget japan has defeated china in many wars, and the only reason they don't have one of the strongest armies in the world is because of restrictions placed on them after wwII.
not only that, but china is winning the war of the economy. china going to war would only be good for the us.
4. no, because like most far soviet states in the past, it's just a madman put in power to control the local populace and pay tribute to mother russia. russia cares so little about it's captured territories. that's why they left afghanistan and the other stans. if it's not financially viable and has no military purpose, they dip and leave the area in chaos for the us to clean up and try to "win hearts and minds.". And in all of those scenerios, you honestly think we are going to leave the gear there too? That gear that is protecting those nations are OURS, meaning the USA military's gear. To get rid of the US military is also getting rid of the gear that goes with it. It would be open season for all of the nations we are defending.
Maybe if you understand humans more, you will realize that we are all just evil beings when we have no restrictions to prevent us from killing each other.
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2014-02-09 15:43:50
Sweden, France and Switzerland doesn't have a viable army either. They are protected by the EU, and by extension, the USA. The first sentence made me laugh, the second sentence made me wake up my mother.
Out of the three countries, one has nothing to fear war-wise and has no reason to have an army, the second is a legendary neutral country and the last one not only has an army but has a lot of involvement in middle east and Africa. Not even talking about the fact that one of these countries was responsible for what happened to Khadaffi not long ago.
You should think before you post, or not post at all, either are better ideas than what you just did.
By Jetackuu 2014-02-09 15:44:38
well... it's the canadian unified forces. mainly the royal navy.
it's all very frilly. although they sent soldiers to iraq and afghanistan who died fighting our shitty wars. whether or not you believe in the causes of the wars, i think a true american shows gratitude for soldiers that fight for us. just because the soldiers think they're fighting for just causes doesn't mean they are.
Personally I have an issue with "supporting" people who enable war profiteering, but that's just me.
qft. i specifically referred to them as shitty wars and only said we should be more supportive than completely mocking an army that supported ours in a war. no one is saying they were good wars or yay emperor bush. fair enough, sorry I'm tired :P
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-02-09 15:46:22
Someone played Civilization too much.
Ragnarok.Zeig
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1619
By Ragnarok.Zeig 2014-02-09 15:50:28
France doesn't have a viable army?
Ragnarok.Hevans
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15273
By Ragnarok.Hevans 2014-02-09 15:50:42
fair enough, sorry I'm tired :P
sorry. i just didn't want this to roll into an argument i wasn't trying to make.
And in all of those scenerios, you honestly think we are going to leave the gear there too? That gear that is protecting those nations are OURS, meaning the USA military's gear. To get rid of the US military is also getting rid of the gear that goes with it. It would be open season for all of the nations we are defending.
Maybe if you understand humans more, you will realize that we are all just evil beings when we have no restrictions to prevent us from killing each other.
ugh no, the us is THE biggest arms supplier in the world. our produce is war and we sell guns, ammo, and military tech to every country we support. also, it usually costs more to ship all that gear back, especially considering we have a surplus back in the us. we either give it for free or sell it for cheap. maybe you should look up the history of how these things happen instead of appealing to, "people are evil".
Ever since I first left America for three years and realized how poorly people from other countries seemed to look at the good ol' USA, and how bad I think the political system has gotten, I've added the US presidency to my bucket list.
Every day I eat, sleep, lift, and study in an effort to some day put myself if a financial situation where I can acquire my name and secure my way to the presidency in a route quite different than a typical politician, though not unfamiliar to the game altogether. Name recognition is the route I'm after.
When I'm president I've thought of a few things I'd like to see changed, and open them up for debate, and maybe let some of you plebes alter the ideals of a future US president. In no particular order:
Esperanto Second Language classes starting in elementary:
Esperanto is a created language that's kinda simple to learn in comparison to others, and can be vaguely understood by some people who don't even speak it as it uses a lot of familiar roots and affixes to create words, has set pronunciations for all letters, and grammar rules that lack the exceptions seen in English. It's estimated by some that a native speaker of romantic languages would take roughly 150 hours to become proficient enough to communicate easily with the language, which is incredibly fast if you know anything about learning languages. It's culture neutral, and would help foster cultural exchanges and ease communications between Americans and Europeans and Central/South Americans. It can also help with the absorption of other languages, so instead of being an end in itself, it could be a means to help one become multilingual, something that's rare for most Americans.
National legalization and taxation of Pot:
Hopefully this one will change by the time I'm president and it'll be one less battle for me to fight. Legalization means less money spent fighting it and more money from taxing it. Decriminalization right now would save Americans as lot of money as is. I do not believe legalizing it will cause an epidemic because anyone who wants to try it will try it anyway because you can easily get it on most city street corners as it is. I know I don't want to smoke pot now and I won't smoke it when it's legal. It's already been legalized in Colorado and look how terrible that's gone, right? They're on track to generate 100mil in the first year of taxation, imagine even half of that from all 50 states.
Legalization of prostitution:
Arguably the most difficult of things to change with American society being so prudish. The idea here is the same as the legalization of pot. We license prostitutes and create legal areas for them to work in. I came to this idea after seeing how poorly average streetwalkers are treated and how they're hunted down by police. It can be decriminalized and taxed to generate money, and keep money from leaving the country on foreign "sexpeditions." The idea behind this is people who want to use prostitutes will use them, and this is a way to protect both the prostitute and the buyer with mandatory monthly screenings required for license, safe houses to protect from violence against either party, and less anxiety for all involved. Texas alone spends almost 8million dollars a year housing prostitutes in prison, and the industry itself pulls in up to an estimated 30 billion a year. That's one hell of a national source of income if taxed and licensed properly. It also help individuals too. People may not like it but some have to turn to prostitution to get by, and legalizing it can help consenting adults of legal age get the money needed to have a reasonable life. It goes along with one of my firm beliefs that what these people do with their bodies is none of your f*cking business.
Super PAC Busting and Corporations are Not people:
I will bust the sh*t out of any source of large scale, unlimited "donations" to politicians. Nothing will be anonymous on this issue and I will make damn sure something like this doesn't happen again in my lifetime. We've allowed these people to make it perfectly legal to buy off politicians, and that defeats the entire purpose of a representative democracy.
National Legalization of Gay Marriage:
Again, who the f*ck are you to tell someone who can and can't get married? It's as simple as that, live and let live. This is another issue I shouldn't have to worry about by the time I'm president, I hope.
National Weight Training Requirements for all Teenagers:
Requiring all teenagers to have classes in weight training is a great way to improve the shape of America from early on. It saves money in medical costs, is much safer than almost all sports Americans commonly engage in at high school, and does wonders for self-esteem. All beginners can see rapid gains in strength, and with that can be urged to continue. Striking at the age of puberty, the training can have the highest effect on young males with their almost freakish rate of growth.
Closing Tax Loopholes:
Cracking down on this is extremely important. People have come to see taxes as evil instead of a necessary part of government. With the way the current government works, I'm not surprised people distrust and hate taxes when they don't see as much benefit from them as they should and the wealthy pay a disproportionate amount. Closing tax haven and last in first out accounting loopholes, among many others, are things that must be stopped, it costs the American government over $100 billion a year.
Military Changes:
America doesn't need as large a standing army as it has. We could easily cut the number in half over time and not have to worry thanks to technological advances. Also, America will never again invade and occupy another country. It's costly, stupid, and makes people hate you even more.
Legalizing the Sale of Organs:
This one I can't really believe isn't a legal thing yet. Relying on the altruism of others is a fool's game. We have a shortage of organs needed and desperate people will turn to underground shady alternatives. Properly screening donors for an extended period of time removes the risk of "faulty" organs, gives donors time to think over the procedure and its consequences, and protects both parties. It also offers a final safety valve on your financial issues if the need becomes great enough. Once again, it offers people a choice of what to do with their lives that is no one else's business.
Those are just some of the things that are on my agenda. There are other things, but mostly just paradigm shifts instead of laws. Nothing will change if we don't change the views of the people in general. I want to help people see the government as something working for them, which is how it's supposed to be. I want to cut down on the litigious nature of the American people, by encouraging people to be less gigantic pussies and by simplifying all laws in general. I want to encourage the new generations to honor the spirit of a law more than the letter. I want to encourage tolerance of all people regardless of skin color, sexual orientation, nationality, religion (or lack thereof), or profession. I want to encourage the American people to stop looking for the easy way and extol the value of actual hard work. I want to make people realize that we are not all equals, but we all deserve basic and equal rights and opportunities, that while we may not all make ourselves into the next Bill Gates, Russell Wilson, or Tom Hanks we all have the same chance to make something of ourselves by working hard. I want to kill the new almighty god above all: The American Dollar.
I want to encourage these things by leading by example and making use of the indomitable human will we can all possess.
So come at me f*ckers! What would you do if president? What do you agree or disagree with?
Edit: some typos.
|
|