Official Benghazi Topic Till The Year 2018+

If nothing else, I give you props for your drive. You exist for the sole purpose of giving us something to laugh at, and yet you keep on pushin'

Fight the good fight!

And you talk like a man with a paper ***.

There WERE WMD's. I know you fools think it has been decided fact that there were none, but there WERE.

WikiLeaks is one source of evidence:
An initial glance at the WikiLeaks war logs doesn’t reveal evidence of some massive WMD program by the Saddam Hussein regime — the Bush administration’s most (in)famous rationale for invading Iraq. But chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam’s toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents.

In August 2004, for instance, American forces surreptitiously purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard, a toxic “blister agent” used as a chemical weapon since World War I. The troops tested the liquid, and “reported two positive results for blister.” The chemical was then “triple-sealed and transported to a secure site” outside their base. …

Nearly three years later, American troops were still finding WMD in the region. An armored Buffalo vehicle unearthed a cache of artillery shells “that was covered by sacks and leaves under an Iraqi Community Watch checkpoint. “The 155mm rounds are filled with an unknown liquid, and several of which are leaking a black tar-like substance.” Initial tests were inconclusive. But later, “the rounds tested positive for mustard.”

Can you do ANYTHING but talk about me? You are obsessed. Go away with your little ad homs.

Can you do ANYTHING but talk about me? You are obsessed. Go away with your little ad homs.

One armchair military strategist's assertion does not proof make.

Neither does a mantra of disinformation from the left.

Bismarck.Oldelf said: »
Especially when it could have been prevented and then the scum bag professional politicians(Both Democrats and Republicans) go on TV and LIE/Cover-up to save them selves.

Prove it.

Not to say that Benghazi as a whole wasn't poorly handled by the powers that be, but that's a pretty bold(and unsupported) statement.

Prove it try reading theres evidence already that proves it .

The problem with most of you is you have bought into this us vs them mentality. Democrat vs Replublican. pull your heads out of the Professional Politicians ***'s. Think for yourself Open your Eyes. These politicians aren't here for US they exist for themselves. Which is proven by all the lies they dish out to us every time they open their mouths.
They lie 90% of the time. They tell you what you want to here. To just shut you up. And now more than ever now they're convincing you those guy are liars they're evil. Don't pay attention at what we aren't doing for the good of the nation. Be distracted and watch the other side so we can steal, lie cheat and take more from everyone.

STOP voting in these professional Politicains.

Oh please, do point out who we are suppose to vote for then.

looks like it. Its not like anyone posts anything remotely accurate. I mean we got wikileaks going on in here.

I want 4 political Party's in this country. the more the better keeps them honest. If you noticed the 2-3 times a new political party starts to gain popularity they get the media to crush them out of existence.
They Don't want the competition.

looks like it. Its not like anyone posts anything remotely accurate. I mean we got wikileaks going on in here.

wow you are closed minded lol

why not just have 1 political party then maybe a Dictator Emperor King

To be honest, I don't believe either party has the best interests in for the people of the United States more than themselves and who buys in their support. I think the whole system needs reworked with more checks to make sure it's not corporations running the country.