Shiva.Nikolce said:
Cerberus.Starr said:
Shiva.Nikolce said:
Cerberus.Starr said:
So you'll use carbon dating to claim that dinosaurs exists (and contradict the Bible) then when it is used to validate the historicity of the Bible you will claim it's false? You are so smart, why didn't I think of that?
I'll give you one big cookie for using historicity in a sentance correctly. But it's going to have a huge bite out of it for not explaining what carbon dating validated in the bible.
It validates the location of the Israelites (Jews), the duration of their beliefs etc etc, (not the existence of God, I clearly did not say this). I thought an intellectual like yourself would have been able to acknowledge this from reading the examples that I posted, actually you probably didn't even read it because you're so biased and bigoted.
I'm biased and bigoted? For taking a bite out of the cookie? I just wanted to know what you thought carbon dating proved in the bible and when anyone claimed that proof was false. I was sure I missed something. "You sound like a babbling retard when you don't use any context."
The hell, do I have to talk to everyone like a 3 year old here? The carbon dating proves the age of the fragments in the SPECIFIC examples I gave, which proves the historical accuracy of the Bible, which people tried to claim was all *** and false til proved wrong. Does this prove the existence of God? No. Did I say it did? No, but it gives merit to the Bible as being accurate where once people would have claimed it was all fiction and now they have to accept that more and more of it is true. I called you biased and bigoted because you didn't even read the examples I gave because in your mind you had already deemed it untrue because you are biased against religion. If you DID read them then you wouldn't be asking me what carbon dating can be done to prove the historicity of the Bible, and you didn't, instead you went full on attacking my beliefs because they offend you.