Post deleted by User.
Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking? |
||
Random Thoughts.....What are you thinking?
Yay, did Proto-Omega, got heart, hing leg, and tail all in one :D
Odin.Headstrong
Offline
Eh i treat most movies like porn, and watch stuff online mostly <.< only buy stuff when i actually like it a lot
But yeah i feel like i've seen it all sometimes QQ this is pretty cool.
In a conversation with a physics professor who has a ph.d in astrophysics. a grad student studying biology. a grad student studying physics and me as a computer science undergrad and a grocery chain owner. talking about the plane on a conveyor belt problem. Okay, here's a game for all you movie buffs.
Now, this is going to take dedication, and you don't have to do it if you don't want to, I'm more or less just curious to see if anyone can do it if they get bored enough. Connections! Basically, someone would name off two actors that haven't been in a flick together. Then, a person must watch one movie with one of the actors. Keeping this in mind, the next movie that needs to be found is one with an actor from the movie you just watched that wasn't the original actor. Keep it going in this fashion until you get to the last actor named. For example: Freddie Prinze Jr. and John Goodman. Just a thought, but if someone's got a lot of movies with a lot of time on their hands and want to try something new, that could be worth a try. Asura.Schizm said: » Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Okay, here's a game for all you movie buffs. Now, this is going to take dedication, and you don't have to do it if you don't want to, I'm more or less just curious to see if anyone can do it if they get bored enough. Connections! Basically, someone would name off two actors that haven't been in a flick together. Then, a person must watch one movie with one of the actors. Keeping this in mind, the next movie that needs to be found is one with an actor from the movie you just watched that wasn't the original actor. Keep it going in this fashion until you get to the last actor named. For example: Freddie Prinze Jr. and John Goodman. Just a thought, but if someone's got a lot of movies with a lot of time on their hands and want to try something new, that could be worth a try. Not sure, guess I am picky on movies as well, unless it was 'King Ralph', not sure I would watch a movie with either actor. BLASPHEMER!!! volkom said: » this is pretty cool. In a conversation with a physics professor who has a ph.d in astrophysics. a grad student studying biology. a grad student studying physics and me as a computer science undergrad and a grocery chain owner. talking about the plane on a conveyor belt problem. It's simple... you can't create lift if no wind is going under the wings. Mag, John Goodman playing that role... Great character or THE GREATEST character? lol
Odin.Eikechi said: » Mag, John Goodman playing that role... Great character or THE GREATEST character? lol Bismarck.Leonkasai said: » Fenrir.Weakness said: » volkom said: » this is pretty cool. In a conversation with a physics professor who has a ph.d in astrophysics. a grad student studying biology. a grad student studying physics and me as a computer science undergrad and a grocery chain owner. talking about the plane on a conveyor belt problem. It's simple... you can't create lift if no wind is going under the wings. we're argueing cuz there's different interpretations and assumptions that causes conflicts with what the expected problem answer should be. (we're trying to answer the physic's professor's final problem on his final exam) Bismarck.Dreadnot
Offline
Fenrir.Weakness said: » volkom said: » this is pretty cool. In a conversation with a physics professor who has a ph.d in astrophysics. a grad student studying biology. a grad student studying physics and me as a computer science undergrad and a grocery chain owner. talking about the plane on a conveyor belt problem. It's simple... you can't create lift if no wind is going under the wings. The physics are correct. Lift is generated by airspeed. Forward motion is generated because the engine (jet or propeller) acts against the air, not the ground. With enough forward motion* you will generate lift from the engine a stationary plane can take off. Bismarck.Dreadnot said: » Fenrir.Weakness said: » volkom said: » this is pretty cool. In a conversation with a physics professor who has a ph.d in astrophysics. a grad student studying biology. a grad student studying physics and me as a computer science undergrad and a grocery chain owner. talking about the plane on a conveyor belt problem. It's simple... you can't create lift if no wind is going under the wings. The physics are correct. Lift is generated by airspeed. Forward motion is generated because the engine (jet or propeller) acts against the air, not the ground. With enough forward motion* you will generate lift from the engine a stationary plane can take off. Oh... well that makes sense and I'm HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE then. Obviously what's important in this problem is math.
I'm going to go sit in a corner and hit myself in the head with a frying pan. Evening, folks.
I miss anything exciting today? Oh, Mag. I forgot to tell you. I got The Big Lebowski on dvd for xmas. I don't know why, but I thought it was funny. :x *looks at clock* I don't wanna go to work. x.x Shiva.Spathaian said: » Evening, folks. I miss anything exciting today? Oh, Mag. I forgot to tell you. I got The Big Lebowski on dvd for xmas. I don't know why, but I thought it was funny. :x *looks at clock* I don't wanna go to work. x.x Shiva.Spathaian said: » Evening, folks. I miss anything exciting today? I actually got some work done today! :D An evil genius. It was my sister and she wrapped all my presents in this glittery paper because she knew I hated glitter. -.-;
I ended up covered in the stuff. Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Whoever got that for you is a genius. The important part of that movie isn't the plot or the story. It's the characters and the absurdity. I have yet to find a movie with characters that can match TBL. That's actually pretty damn accurate to why that movie was so great lol. The story was silly as ***, but what really made it, was all of the actors playing their parts so wonderfully. Odin.Eikechi said: » Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Whoever got that for you is a genius. The important part of that movie isn't the plot or the story. It's the characters and the absurdity. I have yet to find a movie with characters that can match TBL. That's actually pretty damn accurate to why that movie was so great lol. The story was silly as ***, but what really made it, was all of the actors playing their parts so wonderfully. Shiva.Spathaian said: » Yeah, nothing was ad libbed, which is kind of crazy lol.
Odin.Eikechi said: » Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Whoever got that for you is a genius. The important part of that movie isn't the plot or the story. It's the characters and the absurdity. I have yet to find a movie with characters that can match TBL. That's actually pretty damn accurate to why that movie was so great lol. The story was silly as ***, but what really made it, was all of the actors playing their parts so wonderfully. The movie for me isn't about the plot. It is about some great actors taking one of the most HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE scripts and making it good through their acting. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|