{Recruiting!} FFXIClopedia Editing Team

Language: JP EN DE FR
2010-09-08
New Items
users online
Forum » FFXI » General » {Recruiting!} FFXIClopedia Editing Team
{Recruiting!} FFXIClopedia Editing Team
First Page 2 3
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 17:07:27
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Hello, I'm Iminiilusions, and I'm posting this for those of you that would enjoy furthering FFXIClopedia by helping to keep it up to date. I am posting this for people that would be interested in banding together to form a proper editing team for the Clopedia. If you're interested, you can private message me and I can get you settled. Thanks!
[+]
 Leviathan.Comeatmebro
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: Rairin
Posts: 6052
By Leviathan.Comeatmebro 2018-01-31 18:04:55
Link | Quote | Reply
 
there's a real wiki located at http://www.bg-wiki.com

please stop this stupid two wikis nonsense, bg-wiki is more complete at this point and has a much nicer interface and no questionable ads.. if you're going to contribute to one that's the obvious choice
[+]
 Odin.Drakenv
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Drakenv
Posts: 3816
By Odin.Drakenv 2018-01-31 18:11:38
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »
there's a real wiki located at http://www.bg-wiki.com

please stop this stupid two wikis nonsense, bg-wiki is more complete at this point and has a much nicer interface and no questionable ads.. if you're going to contribute to one that's the obvious choice[
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 18:25:16
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Where in your opinion is duly noted, I will have to ask for serious replies only. If you have nothing to contribute, then don't respond to this post. Thanks.
Offline
Posts: 251
By hobo 2018-01-31 18:34:10
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Serious Replies on FFXIAH? Is this real life
[+]
 Leviathan.Kaparu
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: Tsuko
Posts: 949
By Leviathan.Kaparu 2018-01-31 18:39:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Where in your opinion is duly noted, I will have to ask for serious replies only. If you have nothing to contribute, then don't respond to this post. Thanks.

It's a serious criticism. Splitting available information between two sources isn't helpful to the community, and one of the wikis is already actively updated with an incredibly user friendly interface. We all stand to benefit if the alternative is left to die.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 18:39:21
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Unfortunately, yes...
 Leviathan.Kaparu
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: Tsuko
Posts: 949
By Leviathan.Kaparu 2018-01-31 18:40:11
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I'm glad you agree.
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 18:41:11
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Kaparu said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Where in your opinion is duly noted, I will have to ask for serious replies only. If you have nothing to contribute, then don't respond to this post. Thanks.

It's a serious criticism. Splitting available information between two sources isn't helpful to the community, and one of the wikis is already actively updated with an incredibly user friendly interface. We all stand to benefit if the alternative is left to die.

I beg to differ. There's a good chance that one will have info that the other doesn't. I view it more as a fact check than splitting the community.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2018-01-31 18:41:19
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | Quote | Reply
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 18:41:55
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Kaparu said: »
I'm glad you agree.

I was replying to this:

hobo said: »
Serious Replies on FFXIAH? Is this real life
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 18:44:04
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Candlejack said: »
I'd volunteer my time for this, but unfortunately the truth is that BG is, truly, more complete. Now, hear me out for a moment before getting defensive. FFXIwiki wound up faltering around the time Adoulin, RoV, Delve, and a whole bunch of other content was coming out while BG was being maintained and kept up to date. That said, BG is the more complete source of information and the one most people will logically turn to. If you had wanted to keep FFXIwiki up and running, your team at the time shouldn't have slacked off and should have worked to make your site the more complete of the two.

Yes, but the Clopedia had greedy owners at the time who sold it to Wikia. BG got a great big bump when they posted the hacked emails between Ganiman and the CEO of Wikia.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 18:45:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Clopedia started dying when that "merge" happened. There's still stands no reason why both Clopedia and BG can't coexist.
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 18:50:16
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Candlejack said: »
If you had wanted to keep FFXIwiki up and running, your team at the time shouldn't have slacked off and should have worked to make your site the more complete of the two.

There also really was no *team* this would be the first actual team that Clopedia would have. We had 2 greedy owners that were only interested in profiting from the site. We were solely run on a community that would pool information.
 Leviathan.Kaparu
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: Tsuko
Posts: 949
By Leviathan.Kaparu 2018-01-31 18:56:54
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Leviathan.Kaparu said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Where in your opinion is duly noted, I will have to ask for serious replies only. If you have nothing to contribute, then don't respond to this post. Thanks.

It's a serious criticism. Splitting available information between two sources isn't helpful to the community, and one of the wikis is already actively updated with an incredibly user friendly interface. We all stand to benefit if the alternative is left to die.

I beg to differ. There's a good chance that one will have info that the other doesn't. I view it more as a fact check than splitting the community.

Wikis don't need counter-wikis to fact check them. That's what the moderating community is for. Again, BGWiki already does this quite well
[+]
 Leviathan.Comeatmebro
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: Rairin
Posts: 6052
By Leviathan.Comeatmebro 2018-01-31 18:56:54
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Clopedia started dying when that "merge" happened. There's still stands no reason why both Clopedia and BG can't coexist.
You're right, there's no reason they can't coexist.

However, both are missing significant amounts of information. Clopedia is missing much more information. Neither is likely to be complete in the near future.

With that in mind, concentrating efforts toward the one that's largely preferred by the community and closer to complete creates a one stop solution faster than splitting effort does.

There's no need for redundancy, edit history is completely visible and spicy practically lives on the edit stream making sure it's accurate.

The only real question here is, why are you recruiting people for Clopedia? Did wikia send you as a community representative to try to save it, or what? I can't imagine it's entirely out of faith to the wiki, because anyone with eyes can see that bg-wiki is much cleaner and easier to use.
[+]
 Odin.Drakenv
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Drakenv
Posts: 3816
By Odin.Drakenv 2018-01-31 19:03:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Candlejack said: »
If you had wanted to keep FFXIwiki up and running, your team at the time shouldn't have slacked off and should have worked to make your site the more complete of the two.

There also really was no *team* this would be the first actual team that Clopedia would have. We had 2 greedy owners that were only interested in profiting from the site. We were solely run on a community that would pool information.
I’m down just don’t be mad when I link everything back to bgwiki ;)
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 19:07:44
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Clopedia started dying when that "merge" happened. There's still stands no reason why both Clopedia and BG can't coexist.
You're right, there's no reason they can't coexist.

However, both are missing significant amounts of information. Clopedia is missing much more information. Neither is likely to be complete in the near future.

With that in mind, concentrating efforts toward the one that's largely preferred by the community and closer to complete creates a one stop solution faster than splitting effort does.

There's no need for redundancy, edit history is completely visible and spicy practically lives on the edit stream making sure it's accurate.

The only real question here is, why are you recruiting people for Clopedia? Did wikia send you as a community representative to try to save it, or what? I can't imagine it's entirely out of faith to the wiki, because anyone with eyes can see that bg-wiki is much cleaner and easier to use.

Well Spicy is Spicy, and its what he does best. On to that second part. No, Wikia did not send me as a CR, although yes I am trying to save it. I personally hate the Wikia platform and would love nothing more than to see Wikia drop Clopedia, that way I could dump the entire website to a static html and go about getting a host that isn't trash. What I am doing is purely out of faith for the wiki. I started using ffxiclopedia far before I discovered BG. Although I do admit that Clopedia isn't in the best of conditions, but it is far from beyond repair.
Offline
By Draylo 2018-01-31 19:08:34
Link | Quote | Reply
 
How does BG wiki pay for their servers? I don't recall ads there. If its only from their donations, I'm surprised they keep it going considering most of their staff hates current XI. I haven't been to clopedia in years though, that is a lost cause.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 19:09:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Drakenv said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions said: »
Candlejack said: »
If you had wanted to keep FFXIwiki up and running, your team at the time shouldn't have slacked off and should have worked to make your site the more complete of the two.

There also really was no *team* this would be the first actual team that Clopedia would have. We had 2 greedy owners that were only interested in profiting from the site. We were solely run on a community that would pool information.
I’m down just don’t be mad when I link everything back to bgwiki ;)

I mean, from what I understand, BG is doing alright, and that there's been random peeps that just copied BG's pages to Clopedia, which I don't blame them for.
 Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23
By Quetzalcoatl.Iminiillusions 2018-01-31 19:13:09
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Draylo said: »
How does BG wiki pay for their servers? I don't recall ads there. If its only from their donations, I'm surprised they keep it going considering most of their staff hates current XI.

I'd be intersted to find that out too. Now that you mention it, I don't think I seen many ads on there, if any.

Draylo said: »
I haven't been to clopedia in years though, that is a lost cause.

It's more up to date than people think. It's missing a few things yes, and it needs a lot of updating in the odds and ends, yes, but it is far from a lost cause.
Offline
By clearlyamule 2018-01-31 19:25:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Draylo said: »
How does BG wiki pay for their servers? I don't recall ads there. If its only from their donations, I'm surprised they keep it going considering most of their staff hates current XI. I haven't been to clopedia in years though, that is a lost cause.
The forum does yearly donation drives with prizes that usually exceed what they are looking for so I'd guess that
[+]
 Sylph.Funkworkz
VIP
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Funkworkz
Posts: 1407
By Sylph.Funkworkz 2018-01-31 19:33:16
Link | Quote | Reply
 
clearlyamule said: »
Draylo said: »
How does BG wiki pay for their servers? I don't recall ads there. If its only from their donations, I'm surprised they keep it going considering most of their staff hates current XI. I haven't been to clopedia in years though, that is a lost cause.
The forum does yearly donation drives with prizes that usually exceed what they are looking for so I'd guess that

The yearly rafflecopter provides most of the expenses. The few ads on the site have never paid for more than 40% of the server fees.

As a matter of fact, the raffle is starting tomorrow. See https://www.bluegartr.com/forums/69-Forum-Donations-and-BG-Gear for the donation section of the forums. Be sure to check out the previous years raffles for an idea of giveaways if your interested.
[+]
 Valefor.Aeonova
Offline
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
user: aeonova
Posts: 6
By Valefor.Aeonova 2018-01-31 19:49:53
Link | Quote | Reply
 
As far as I recall, the two major detriments to keeping that ffxiclopedia "updated" came with synergy and their first crappy random augment systems using evoliths and etching equipment. Tons of equipment could then be augmented with such classics as Ice Element Resist +3 INT -5 and such. No one wanted to edit pages to reflect all that crappy randomness. The other was the drama-torama you brought up about sketchy sale of the ffxiclopedia to wiki prime.

Enjoy ffxiclopedia's usefulness as it stands now. It's simply a good place for decade+ old content like early missions/quests and seasonal/holiday events.

Nothing stops anyone from having multiple sites as sources for what they need to get done.
Offline
Posts: 98
By whitemage 2018-01-31 19:51:12
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »
there's a real wiki located at http://www.bg-wiki.com

please stop this stupid two wikis nonsense, bg-wiki is more complete at this point and has a much nicer interface and no questionable ads.. if you're going to contribute to one that's the obvious choice


While BG Wiki does have a lot of newer information, I do believe FFXIClopedia came before BG Wiki and still has a lot of stuff that BG Wiki has does not. FFXIClopedia / the people who work on it should not be disrespected. I use both because neither is complete. They both have things the other does not.

I do have an issue with the ads on Wikia brand sites however, especially recently since using Ad blocker in Opera causes the formating of wikia sites to go all "basic looking" messing everything up.

If people want to contribute to one or both wikis that is their choice. I also encourage people who want to start their own new FFXI wiki to do so. We can always share and learn from each other.
[+]
 Odin.Godofgods
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3995
By Odin.Godofgods 2018-01-31 19:52:22
Link | Quote | Reply
 
at this point the community kinda does need both wikis because both are missing large portions of the game. So combined you have a decent chance of finding what you are looking for.

Both have there flaws as well. BGs site navigation is very lacking imo. I know some ppl are fine with it, but it irritates the hell outa me. I also hate there search bar being case sensitive. I always have issues searching for things on there (if there isnt a link to it on the main page).

And clopedia's is quite obvious. I had stopped using them as often as i could because of the overwhelming amount of adds on the pages. First it started screwing with the format. Then it starting have more in page pop up type ads. Then it just got out of hand to the point where my browser would freeze up for 10 min if i tried to enter there site because of all the ads. Granted i had a slightly older computer, but still...

So both site have there ups and down depending on what you need and what you have. There is no reason they cant coexsist other then us bitching about it. - and lets be honest, at this point none of the ffxi players are trying to make a truly complete wiki. Theyve been open editing for ages. Is ppl want to take the time to add tons of info, they could. (yes, i know open to all has its issues, but the point is still valid.)

But ffxiclopedia was there for everyone when we first started. And it got us through a lot of game play. So no hating... unless its on the ads ><
[+]
 Asura.Carrotchan
Leonardo da Clippi
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1462
By Asura.Carrotchan 2018-01-31 19:58:39
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Search bar is no longer case sensitive
[+]
 Odin.Godofgods
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3995
By Odin.Godofgods 2018-01-31 20:00:57
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Asura.Carrotchan said: »
Search bar is no longer case sensitive
good. that always irritated me.
(I havnt rly been able to play the last several months due to moving. SO im a little bit behind)
 Shiva.Haldarn
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Haldarn
Posts: 82
By Shiva.Haldarn 2018-01-31 20:03:37
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Godofgods said: »
And clopedia's is quite obvious. I had stopped using them as often as i could because of the overwhelming amount of adds on the pages. First it started screwing with the format. Then it starting have more in page pop up type ads. Then it just got out of hand to the point where my browser would freeze up for 10 min if i tried to enter there site because of all the ads. Granted i had a slightly older computer, but still...

If you don't like the ads, log in and they're gone (except on the front main page).

If you don't like the layout (Wikia skin/Oasis), you can change My Preferences -> Appearance -> Layout to Monobook, so it looks like it did in the old days.

I've popped that info on FFXIclopedia's main page now too.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 98
By whitemage 2018-01-31 20:09:55
Link | Quote | Reply
 
whitemage said: »
I do have an issue with the ads on Wikia brand sites however, especially recently since using Ad blocker in Opera causes the formating of wikia sites to go all "basic looking" messing everything up.

Correct:
Actually, after looking at the site just now with ad blocker turned on its looks fine again.
First Page 2 3
Log in to post.