Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
So 53? I remember saying 53 or 54. So what do I win?
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
Place Your Midterm Election Bets.
Place Your Midterm Election Bets.
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
IT AIN'T OVER TILL THE FAT LADY SINGS!!!!!
[+]
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
So 53? I remember saying 53 or 54. So what do I win?
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
Actually it's 54. AK and LA will be Republican. That's pretty solid, unless of course the Dems can summon enough dead voters for the recount.
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
[+]
2016 looks just fine for the Dems.
Examples of US SENATE bets that don't count!!
betting both sides
betting on local texas races
betting that if you sucked off enough frogs one of them would eventually become a prince
betting on foregone conclusions
Betting on more than one conclusion! THIS AIN'T KENO!!!!
betting both sides
Altimaomega said: »
I'm betting either the Republicans gain massive seats in the senate or are one seat short of the majority.
betting on local texas races
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Only ones I care about are:
Greg Abbot.
Dan Patrick.
Ken Paxton.
Eddie Zamora.
And George Bush
Greg Abbot.
Dan Patrick.
Ken Paxton.
Eddie Zamora.
And George Bush
betting that if you sucked off enough frogs one of them would eventually become a prince
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Long ago, in my wonderfully misspent youth, I could distinguish between at least 9 flavors of communists by year and vineyard.
betting on foregone conclusions
Siren.Mosin said: »
I bet everyone 2 beers mike rounds wins the SD senate seat. not that the 10 people who figured out I don't mean san diego care.
Betting on more than one conclusion! THIS AIN'T KENO!!!!
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
53 or 54
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
He's already getting his dress ready for the 2017 Inaugural Ball.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
So 53? I remember saying 53 or 54. So what do I win?
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
Actually it's 54. AK and LA will be Republican. That's pretty solid, unless of course the Dems can summon enough dead voters for the recount.
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
Stick with the analysts predictions if you want to sound smart.
The seats up for grabs and voting patterns of the demographics favors the Democrats in the 2016 if you completely exclude anything that happens in the next 2 years. At this point, it would be stupid to bet against them, especially considering how much can happen in 2 years politically.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
He's already getting his dress ready for the 2017 Inaugural Ball.
Go with didn't see, because it didn't happen. Another good attempt tho.
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
He's already getting his dress ready for the 2017 Inaugural Ball.
Go with didn't see, because it didn't happen. Another good attempt tho.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Seriously, they just can't get over the fact that a policy so opposed to their ideology worked so well.
Oh, wait, I know... you're talking about how many jobs and how much economic stability has been created by the endemic and repeated kowtowing that Republicans have done to their Wall Street purse-string-holders by removing silly things like banking regulations and consumer protection. Capitalism only works when the working class is incapable of defending itself from its own employers, after all.
Twit.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Are the tears still blurring your vision, or are your delusions coming back?
Like I said you can try to quote it but you are going to fail again.
Shiva.Nikolce said: »
betting on foregone conclusions
I would argue that just makes me shrewd.
[+]
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Seriously, they just can't get over the fact that a policy so opposed to their ideology worked so well.
Oh, wait, I know... you're talking about how many jobs and how much economic stability has been created by the endemic and repeated kowtowing that Republicans have done to their Wall Street purse-string-holders by removing silly things like banking regulations and consumer protection. Capitalism only works when the working class is incapable of defending itself from its own employers, after all.
Twit.
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
So 53? I remember saying 53 or 54. So what do I win?
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
Actually it's 54. AK and LA will be Republican. That's pretty solid, unless of course the Dems can summon enough dead voters for the recount.
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
Stick with the analysts predictions if you want to sound smart.
The seats up for grabs and voting patterns of the demographics favors the Democrats in the 2016 if you completely exclude anything that happens in the next 2 years. At this point, it would be stupid to bet against them, especially considering how much can happen in 2 years politically.
You're understating the ultimate wet blanket of Obama's finger to the country has on liberal voter enthusiasm. A fresh example isn't even a week old at this point. Counting on the first women pres ever is putting all your eggs in one basket. Hillary is your the only viable candidate at this point. I think faith in her is severely "oversold". No battleground state candidate the Clinton's stumped for ended up winning. She isn't as popular as you think she is.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Like I said, go ahead and try. Till then, you are the delusional one.
Shiva.Nikolce said: »
THIS AIN'T KENO!!!!
interestingly enough, or maybe not, it could be keno here, as a ballot measure approved the addition of keno & roulette to casinos in deadwood on tuesday.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
So 53? I remember saying 53 or 54. So what do I win?
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
Actually it's 54. AK and LA will be Republican. That's pretty solid, unless of course the Dems can summon enough dead voters for the recount.
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
Stick with the analysts predictions if you want to sound smart.
The seats up for grabs and voting patterns of the demographics favors the Democrats in the 2016 if you completely exclude anything that happens in the next 2 years. At this point, it would be stupid to bet against them, especially considering how much can happen in 2 years politically.
You're understating the ultimate wet blanket of Obama's finger to the country has on liberal voter enthusiasm. A fresh example isn't even a week old at this point. Counting on the first women pres ever is putting all your eggs in one basket. Hillary is your the only viable candidate at this point. I think faith in her is severely "oversold". No battleground state candidate the Clinton's stumped for ended up winning. She isn't as popular as you think she is.
Can't put anyone on the ballot who can lead and/or work with opposition, has to be somebody to fill in the seat so they can be the first <insert minority> president!
That's the only way they can get the votes.
After Clinton it will be either an Asian or Mexican who will go after the top job. Depending on if Clinton win, it will either be a lady or guy.
That's all they have left at this point. No true leadership, just pandering to people's guilt.
[+]
volkom said: »
can we still place midterm election bets?
YES!
Total seats held by republicans when it's all said and done.
Nik - 52
Chaosx - 53
Nausi - 54
Bets you can't make..... 51, 56, Purple, August, 1 and Texas
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Read the previous page, I already proved you ignorant.
So you have nothing? Yeah, thats what we all knew.
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Seriously, they just can't get over the fact that a policy so opposed to their ideology worked so well.
Oh, wait, I know... you're talking about how many jobs and how much economic stability has been created by the endemic and repeated kowtowing that Republicans have done to their Wall Street purse-string-holders by removing silly things like banking regulations and consumer protection. Capitalism only works when the working class is incapable of defending itself from its own employers, after all.
Twit.
Obamanomics = middle class income goes down
Reaganomics = middle class income goes up
Then I'll join in Nausi and bet that the ending Senate count will be 54 Republicans.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Seriously, they just can't get over the fact that a policy so opposed to their ideology worked so well.
Oh, wait, I know... you're talking about how many jobs and how much economic stability has been created by the endemic and repeated kowtowing that Republicans have done to their Wall Street purse-string-holders by removing silly things like banking regulations and consumer protection. Capitalism only works when the working class is incapable of defending itself from its own employers, after all.
Twit.
Obamanomics = middle class income goes down
Reaganomics = middle class income goes up
Obamanomics = middle class size goes down
Reaganomics = middle class size goes up
But I'm sure that a whole lot of liberal and liberal-leaning posters will say otherwise. They are generally those that consider Obama as a hardcore conservative too....
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
So 53? I remember saying 53 or 54. So what do I win?
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
Actually it's 54. AK and LA will be Republican. That's pretty solid, unless of course the Dems can summon enough dead voters for the recount.
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
Stick with the analysts predictions if you want to sound smart.
The seats up for grabs and voting patterns of the demographics favors the Democrats in the 2016 if you completely exclude anything that happens in the next 2 years. At this point, it would be stupid to bet against them, especially considering how much can happen in 2 years politically.
You're understating the ultimate wet blanket of Obama's finger to the country has on liberal voter enthusiasm. A fresh example isn't even a week old at this point. Counting on the first women pres ever is putting all your eggs in one basket. Hillary is your the only viable candidate at this point. I think faith in her is severely "oversold". No battleground state candidate the Clinton's stumped for ended up winning. She isn't as popular as you think she is.
I wasn't talking about president, obviously, and I couldn't care any less about hillary or obama in relation to 2016. Can we focus on getting some ***fixed before we start the next campaign cycle?
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
So 53? I remember saying 53 or 54. So what do I win?
The analysts predicted 53-54. They win a prize.
Actually it's 54. AK and LA will be Republican. That's pretty solid, unless of course the Dems can summon enough dead voters for the recount.
2016 looks pretty bad for Dems already.
Stick with the analysts predictions if you want to sound smart.
The seats up for grabs and voting patterns of the demographics favors the Democrats in the 2016 if you completely exclude anything that happens in the next 2 years. At this point, it would be stupid to bet against them, especially considering how much can happen in 2 years politically.
You're understating the ultimate wet blanket of Obama's finger to the country has on liberal voter enthusiasm. A fresh example isn't even a week old at this point. Counting on the first women pres ever is putting all your eggs in one basket. Hillary is your the only viable candidate at this point. I think faith in her is severely "oversold". No battleground state candidate the Clinton's stumped for ended up winning. She isn't as popular as you think she is.
I wasn't talking about president, obviously, and I couldn't care any less about hillary or obama in relation to 2016. Can we focus on getting some ***fixed before we start the next campaign cycle?
volkom said: »
can we still place midterm election bets?
YES!
Total Senate seats held by republicans when it's all said and done.
Nik - 52
Chaosx - 53
Nausi and Kingnoobie - 54
Bets you can't make..... 51, 56, Purple, August, 1 and Texas
All independents count for the party they caucus with
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.